The ambivalence of the psychosocial in Norwegian education. A policy document analysis

In this article, I explore the central characteristics of the psychosocial as a field of knowledge in Norwegian education policy and the ways in which these characteristics are conditioned by their constituting social structures and historical contexts. This is achieved through a policy document ana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gro Mathias
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-05-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2021.1958994
id doaj-7c1ac78b5225440f8d5efbf2b0488e8a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7c1ac78b5225440f8d5efbf2b0488e8a2021-10-04T13:57:01ZengTaylor & Francis GroupNordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy2002-03172021-05-0172657710.1080/20020317.2021.19589941958994The ambivalence of the psychosocial in Norwegian education. A policy document analysisGro Mathias0Oslo Metropolitan UniversityIn this article, I explore the central characteristics of the psychosocial as a field of knowledge in Norwegian education policy and the ways in which these characteristics are conditioned by their constituting social structures and historical contexts. This is achieved through a policy document analysis. Even though the psychosocial is habitually employed in educational discourses in Norway, its content often remains unclear. In the analysis, I derive three key dimensions of ambivalence from the documents. First, the psychosocial is ambivalent in its scope, as it oscillates between the entirety of the pupil’s emotional and relational life and the specific phenomenon of bullying. Second, it appears ambivalent in relation to aspects of accountability, as it simultaneously demands responsibility from society as a whole and from specific groups of professionals. Lastly, the psychosocial is ambivalent in the way it asserts its relative and subjective dimension, while also claiming objective and rigid frameworks of control and measurement. Viewed from a broader perspective, I demonstrate that the ambivalences surrounding the psychosocial correspond with the binary concepts of the liquid modernity and the new solidity, as conceived by Per Bjørn Foros and Arne Johan Vetlesen.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2021.1958994psychosocialschool environmentnorwegian education policydocument analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gro Mathias
spellingShingle Gro Mathias
The ambivalence of the psychosocial in Norwegian education. A policy document analysis
Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy
psychosocial
school environment
norwegian education policy
document analysis
author_facet Gro Mathias
author_sort Gro Mathias
title The ambivalence of the psychosocial in Norwegian education. A policy document analysis
title_short The ambivalence of the psychosocial in Norwegian education. A policy document analysis
title_full The ambivalence of the psychosocial in Norwegian education. A policy document analysis
title_fullStr The ambivalence of the psychosocial in Norwegian education. A policy document analysis
title_full_unstemmed The ambivalence of the psychosocial in Norwegian education. A policy document analysis
title_sort ambivalence of the psychosocial in norwegian education. a policy document analysis
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy
issn 2002-0317
publishDate 2021-05-01
description In this article, I explore the central characteristics of the psychosocial as a field of knowledge in Norwegian education policy and the ways in which these characteristics are conditioned by their constituting social structures and historical contexts. This is achieved through a policy document analysis. Even though the psychosocial is habitually employed in educational discourses in Norway, its content often remains unclear. In the analysis, I derive three key dimensions of ambivalence from the documents. First, the psychosocial is ambivalent in its scope, as it oscillates between the entirety of the pupil’s emotional and relational life and the specific phenomenon of bullying. Second, it appears ambivalent in relation to aspects of accountability, as it simultaneously demands responsibility from society as a whole and from specific groups of professionals. Lastly, the psychosocial is ambivalent in the way it asserts its relative and subjective dimension, while also claiming objective and rigid frameworks of control and measurement. Viewed from a broader perspective, I demonstrate that the ambivalences surrounding the psychosocial correspond with the binary concepts of the liquid modernity and the new solidity, as conceived by Per Bjørn Foros and Arne Johan Vetlesen.
topic psychosocial
school environment
norwegian education policy
document analysis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2021.1958994
work_keys_str_mv AT gromathias theambivalenceofthepsychosocialinnorwegianeducationapolicydocumentanalysis
AT gromathias ambivalenceofthepsychosocialinnorwegianeducationapolicydocumentanalysis
_version_ 1716843974935707648