Comparison of the impact of applications of Targeted Transfusion Protocol and Massive Transfusion Protocol in trauma patients

• Main Authors: Shahram Paydar, Hosseinali Khalili, Golnar Sabetian, Behnam Dalfardi, Shahram Bolandparvaz, Mohammad Hadi Niakan, Hamidreza Abbasi, Donat R. Spahn
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2017-12-01
• Series: Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
• Subjects: guidelines; mortality; transfusion; trauma; wounds and injuries
• Online Access: http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-70-626.pdf

BackgroundThe current study assessed a recently developed resuscitation protocol for bleeding trauma patients called the Targeted Transfusion Protocol (TTP) and compared its results with those of the standard Massive Transfusion Protocol (MTP).MethodsPer capita utilization of blood products such as packed red blood cells (RBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and platelet concentrates was compared along with mortality rates during two 6-month periods, one in 2011 (when the standard MTP was followed) and another in 2014 (when the TTP was used). In the TTP, patients were categorized into three groups based on the presence of head injuries, long bone fractures, or penetrating injuries involving the trunk, extremities, or neck who were resuscitated according to separate algorithms. All cases had experienced motor vehicle accidents and had injury severity scores over 16.ResultsNo statistically significant differences were observed between the study groups at hospital admission. Per capita utilization of RBC (4.76 ± 0.92 vs. 3.37 ± 0.55; P = 0.037), FFP (3.71 ± 1.00 vs. 2.40 ± 0.52; P = 0.025), and platelet concentrate (1.18 ± 0.30 vs. 0.55 ± 0.18; P = 0.006) blood products were significantly lower in the TTP epoch. Mortality rates were similar between the two study periods (P = 0.74).ConclusionsIntroduction of the TTP reduced the requirements for RBCs, FFP, and platelet concentrates in severely injured trauma patients.