Fetal gastric pseudomass at 30 weeks of gestation and its regression after 17 days of birth

Second trimester fetal ultrasonography (USG) occasionally reveals an echogenic intragastric mass. These masses are usually small due to the organized debris from swallowed amniotic fluid, and they normally disappear in the third trimester. This report shows a fetal intragastric echogenic mass detect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Balakumar Karippaliyil, Misha Kannan, Milind Karippaliyil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2014-05-01
Series:Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.4103/0971-3026.134403
id doaj-7c083bd75ef140788c283bbb2fa8e2f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7c083bd75ef140788c283bbb2fa8e2f62021-08-02T22:49:10ZengThieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging0971-30261998-38082014-05-01240216016210.4103/0971-3026.134403Fetal gastric pseudomass at 30 weeks of gestation and its regression after 17 days of birthBalakumar Karippaliyil0Misha Kannan1Milind Karippaliyil2Department of Ultrasonography, Balku′s Scan Centre, PVS Hospital, Calicut 2, Kerala, IndiaDepartment of Ultrasonography, Balku′s Scan Centre, PVS Hospital, Calicut 2, Kerala, IndiaDepartment of Ultrasonography, Balku′s Scan Centre, PVS Hospital, Calicut 2, Kerala, IndiaSecond trimester fetal ultrasonography (USG) occasionally reveals an echogenic intragastric mass. These masses are usually small due to the organized debris from swallowed amniotic fluid, and they normally disappear in the third trimester. This report shows a fetal intragastric echogenic mass detected at 30 weeks of gestation that persisted as a large heterogeneously echoic mass even on the 10 th day after birth. The immediate postnatal USG features were consistent with the possibility of an intragastric soft tissue mass, though abdominal  radiographs and computed tomography (CT) with oral contrast were non-specific. The baby remained asymptomatic in the neonatal period and USG scanning again after a week showed normal stomach and other intra-abdominal visceral echoes.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.4103/0971-3026.134403fetal anomalyfetal gastric pseudomassfetal gastrointestinal anomalies
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Balakumar Karippaliyil
Misha Kannan
Milind Karippaliyil
spellingShingle Balakumar Karippaliyil
Misha Kannan
Milind Karippaliyil
Fetal gastric pseudomass at 30 weeks of gestation and its regression after 17 days of birth
Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging
fetal anomaly
fetal gastric pseudomass
fetal gastrointestinal anomalies
author_facet Balakumar Karippaliyil
Misha Kannan
Milind Karippaliyil
author_sort Balakumar Karippaliyil
title Fetal gastric pseudomass at 30 weeks of gestation and its regression after 17 days of birth
title_short Fetal gastric pseudomass at 30 weeks of gestation and its regression after 17 days of birth
title_full Fetal gastric pseudomass at 30 weeks of gestation and its regression after 17 days of birth
title_fullStr Fetal gastric pseudomass at 30 weeks of gestation and its regression after 17 days of birth
title_full_unstemmed Fetal gastric pseudomass at 30 weeks of gestation and its regression after 17 days of birth
title_sort fetal gastric pseudomass at 30 weeks of gestation and its regression after 17 days of birth
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
series Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging
issn 0971-3026
1998-3808
publishDate 2014-05-01
description Second trimester fetal ultrasonography (USG) occasionally reveals an echogenic intragastric mass. These masses are usually small due to the organized debris from swallowed amniotic fluid, and they normally disappear in the third trimester. This report shows a fetal intragastric echogenic mass detected at 30 weeks of gestation that persisted as a large heterogeneously echoic mass even on the 10 th day after birth. The immediate postnatal USG features were consistent with the possibility of an intragastric soft tissue mass, though abdominal  radiographs and computed tomography (CT) with oral contrast were non-specific. The baby remained asymptomatic in the neonatal period and USG scanning again after a week showed normal stomach and other intra-abdominal visceral echoes.
topic fetal anomaly
fetal gastric pseudomass
fetal gastrointestinal anomalies
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.4103/0971-3026.134403
work_keys_str_mv AT balakumarkarippaliyil fetalgastricpseudomassat30weeksofgestationanditsregressionafter17daysofbirth
AT mishakannan fetalgastricpseudomassat30weeksofgestationanditsregressionafter17daysofbirth
AT milindkarippaliyil fetalgastricpseudomassat30weeksofgestationanditsregressionafter17daysofbirth
_version_ 1721226094630141952