Quantification of Plasma miRNAs by Digital PCR for Cancer Diagnosis

Analysis of plasma microRNAs (miRNAs) by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) provides a potential approach for cancer diagnosis. However, absolutely quantifying low abundant plasma miRNAs is challenging with qPCR. Digital PCR offers a unique means for assessment of nucleic acids presenting...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jie Ma, Ning Li, Maria Guarnera, Feng Jiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2013-01-01
Series:Biomarker Insights
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4137/BMI.S13154
id doaj-7bfcca606c2a43ba8fa042f608f6cf52
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7bfcca606c2a43ba8fa042f608f6cf522020-11-25T03:31:52ZengSAGE PublishingBiomarker Insights1177-27192013-01-01810.4137/BMI.S13154Quantification of Plasma miRNAs by Digital PCR for Cancer DiagnosisJie Ma0Ning Li1Maria Guarnera2Feng Jiang3Authors with equal contributions.Authors with equal contributions.Departments of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.Departments of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.Analysis of plasma microRNAs (miRNAs) by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) provides a potential approach for cancer diagnosis. However, absolutely quantifying low abundant plasma miRNAs is challenging with qPCR. Digital PCR offers a unique means for assessment of nucleic acids presenting at low levels in plasma. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of digital PCR for quantification of plasma miRNAs and the potential utility of this technique for cancer diagnosis. We used digital PCR to quantify the copy number of plasma microRNA-21-5p (miR-21–5p) and microRNA-335–3p (miR-335–3p) in 36 lung cancer patients and 38 controls. Digital PCR showed a high degree of linearity and quantitative correlation with miRNAs in a dynamic range from 1 to 10,000 copies/μL of input, with high reproducibility. qPCR exhibited a dynamic range from 100 to 1X10 7 copies/μL of input. Digital PCR had a higher sensitivity to detect copy number of the miRNAs compared with qPCR. In plasma, digital PCR could detect copy number of both miR-21–5p and miR-335–3p, whereas qPCR was only able to assess miR-21–5p. Quantification of the plasma miRNAs by digital PCR provided 71.8% sensitivity and 80.6% specificity in distinguishing lung cancer patients from cancer-free subjects.https://doi.org/10.4137/BMI.S13154
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jie Ma
Ning Li
Maria Guarnera
Feng Jiang
spellingShingle Jie Ma
Ning Li
Maria Guarnera
Feng Jiang
Quantification of Plasma miRNAs by Digital PCR for Cancer Diagnosis
Biomarker Insights
author_facet Jie Ma
Ning Li
Maria Guarnera
Feng Jiang
author_sort Jie Ma
title Quantification of Plasma miRNAs by Digital PCR for Cancer Diagnosis
title_short Quantification of Plasma miRNAs by Digital PCR for Cancer Diagnosis
title_full Quantification of Plasma miRNAs by Digital PCR for Cancer Diagnosis
title_fullStr Quantification of Plasma miRNAs by Digital PCR for Cancer Diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of Plasma miRNAs by Digital PCR for Cancer Diagnosis
title_sort quantification of plasma mirnas by digital pcr for cancer diagnosis
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Biomarker Insights
issn 1177-2719
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Analysis of plasma microRNAs (miRNAs) by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) provides a potential approach for cancer diagnosis. However, absolutely quantifying low abundant plasma miRNAs is challenging with qPCR. Digital PCR offers a unique means for assessment of nucleic acids presenting at low levels in plasma. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of digital PCR for quantification of plasma miRNAs and the potential utility of this technique for cancer diagnosis. We used digital PCR to quantify the copy number of plasma microRNA-21-5p (miR-21–5p) and microRNA-335–3p (miR-335–3p) in 36 lung cancer patients and 38 controls. Digital PCR showed a high degree of linearity and quantitative correlation with miRNAs in a dynamic range from 1 to 10,000 copies/μL of input, with high reproducibility. qPCR exhibited a dynamic range from 100 to 1X10 7 copies/μL of input. Digital PCR had a higher sensitivity to detect copy number of the miRNAs compared with qPCR. In plasma, digital PCR could detect copy number of both miR-21–5p and miR-335–3p, whereas qPCR was only able to assess miR-21–5p. Quantification of the plasma miRNAs by digital PCR provided 71.8% sensitivity and 80.6% specificity in distinguishing lung cancer patients from cancer-free subjects.
url https://doi.org/10.4137/BMI.S13154
work_keys_str_mv AT jiema quantificationofplasmamirnasbydigitalpcrforcancerdiagnosis
AT ningli quantificationofplasmamirnasbydigitalpcrforcancerdiagnosis
AT mariaguarnera quantificationofplasmamirnasbydigitalpcrforcancerdiagnosis
AT fengjiang quantificationofplasmamirnasbydigitalpcrforcancerdiagnosis
_version_ 1724571251961233408