Is there a correlation between children’s outdoor active mobility behaviour and neighbourhood safety? A systematic review of the evidence

Objective To identify, summarise and evaluate evidence on the correlation between perceived and actual neighbourhood safety (personal and road danger) and diverse forms of outdoor active mobility behaviour (ie, active play, exercise, and travel) among primary-school-aged children.Design A systematic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ori Gudes, Roula Zougheibe, Beverly Jepson, Ashraf Dewan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/7/e047062.full
id doaj-7bfb8f579edc44f1b1a3079fca396568
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7bfb8f579edc44f1b1a3079fca3965682021-10-10T13:30:04ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-07-0111710.1136/bmjopen-2020-047062Is there a correlation between children’s outdoor active mobility behaviour and neighbourhood safety? A systematic review of the evidenceOri Gudes0Roula Zougheibe1Beverly Jepson2Ashraf Dewan32Cooperative Research Centre for Spatial Information and Department of Spatial Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, AustraliaSchool of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, AustraliaSchool of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, AustraliaSchool of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, AustraliaObjective To identify, summarise and evaluate evidence on the correlation between perceived and actual neighbourhood safety (personal and road danger) and diverse forms of outdoor active mobility behaviour (ie, active play, exercise, and travel) among primary-school-aged children.Design A systematic review of evidence from observational studies exploring children’s active mobility behaviour and safety.Data sources Six electronic databases were searched: Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, ProQuest and Web of Science from study inception until July 2020.Data extraction and synthesis Study selection and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. We expanded on a quality assessment tool and adopted a vote-counting technique to determine strength of evidence. The outcomes were categorised by individual, family and neighbourhood levels.Results A total of 29 studies were included, with a majority of cross-sectional design. Higher parental perceived personal safety correlated with increased children’s active mobility behaviour, but most commonly in active travel (eg, independent walking or cycling to a local destination). Increased concerns regarding road danger correlated with a decrease in each type of children’s active behaviour; active travel, play and exercise. However, these correlations were influenced by child’s sex/gender, age, car ownership, neighbourhood types, across time, and proximity to destination. Limited or inconclusive evidence was found on correlate of children’s outdoor active mobility behaviour to ‘stranger danger’, children’s perceived personal safety, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status or measured safety.Conclusion Children are restricted by perception of safety. Encouraging children’s active travel may require future strategies to address characteristics relevant to types of the neighbourhood that promote a high sense of personal safety. Children and parents may embrace other types of active mobility behaviour if road danger is mitigated. Sex/gender and age-specific interventions and redesign of public places could lead to child-friendly cities. Future studies may benefit from adopting validated measurement methods and fill existing research gaps.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/7/e047062.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ori Gudes
Roula Zougheibe
Beverly Jepson
Ashraf Dewan
spellingShingle Ori Gudes
Roula Zougheibe
Beverly Jepson
Ashraf Dewan
Is there a correlation between children’s outdoor active mobility behaviour and neighbourhood safety? A systematic review of the evidence
BMJ Open
author_facet Ori Gudes
Roula Zougheibe
Beverly Jepson
Ashraf Dewan
author_sort Ori Gudes
title Is there a correlation between children’s outdoor active mobility behaviour and neighbourhood safety? A systematic review of the evidence
title_short Is there a correlation between children’s outdoor active mobility behaviour and neighbourhood safety? A systematic review of the evidence
title_full Is there a correlation between children’s outdoor active mobility behaviour and neighbourhood safety? A systematic review of the evidence
title_fullStr Is there a correlation between children’s outdoor active mobility behaviour and neighbourhood safety? A systematic review of the evidence
title_full_unstemmed Is there a correlation between children’s outdoor active mobility behaviour and neighbourhood safety? A systematic review of the evidence
title_sort is there a correlation between children’s outdoor active mobility behaviour and neighbourhood safety? a systematic review of the evidence
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Objective To identify, summarise and evaluate evidence on the correlation between perceived and actual neighbourhood safety (personal and road danger) and diverse forms of outdoor active mobility behaviour (ie, active play, exercise, and travel) among primary-school-aged children.Design A systematic review of evidence from observational studies exploring children’s active mobility behaviour and safety.Data sources Six electronic databases were searched: Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, ProQuest and Web of Science from study inception until July 2020.Data extraction and synthesis Study selection and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. We expanded on a quality assessment tool and adopted a vote-counting technique to determine strength of evidence. The outcomes were categorised by individual, family and neighbourhood levels.Results A total of 29 studies were included, with a majority of cross-sectional design. Higher parental perceived personal safety correlated with increased children’s active mobility behaviour, but most commonly in active travel (eg, independent walking or cycling to a local destination). Increased concerns regarding road danger correlated with a decrease in each type of children’s active behaviour; active travel, play and exercise. However, these correlations were influenced by child’s sex/gender, age, car ownership, neighbourhood types, across time, and proximity to destination. Limited or inconclusive evidence was found on correlate of children’s outdoor active mobility behaviour to ‘stranger danger’, children’s perceived personal safety, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status or measured safety.Conclusion Children are restricted by perception of safety. Encouraging children’s active travel may require future strategies to address characteristics relevant to types of the neighbourhood that promote a high sense of personal safety. Children and parents may embrace other types of active mobility behaviour if road danger is mitigated. Sex/gender and age-specific interventions and redesign of public places could lead to child-friendly cities. Future studies may benefit from adopting validated measurement methods and fill existing research gaps.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/7/e047062.full
work_keys_str_mv AT origudes isthereacorrelationbetweenchildrensoutdooractivemobilitybehaviourandneighbourhoodsafetyasystematicreviewoftheevidence
AT roulazougheibe isthereacorrelationbetweenchildrensoutdooractivemobilitybehaviourandneighbourhoodsafetyasystematicreviewoftheevidence
AT beverlyjepson isthereacorrelationbetweenchildrensoutdooractivemobilitybehaviourandneighbourhoodsafetyasystematicreviewoftheevidence
AT ashrafdewan isthereacorrelationbetweenchildrensoutdooractivemobilitybehaviourandneighbourhoodsafetyasystematicreviewoftheevidence
_version_ 1716829437058613248