Activité définitoire folk et argumentation en contexte polémique

This article analyses folk definitory activities, understood as a set of utterances with a definitory dimension. These utterances manifest a relationship to language, others, and the world which is specific to folk speakers. The article sets itself apart from those analyses which, while looking most...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anne-Charlotte Husson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICO 2020-06-01
Series:Corela
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/corela/11106
id doaj-7be6822de93c4f02814075dd7987fc64
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7be6822de93c4f02814075dd7987fc642020-11-25T03:42:48ZengCercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICOCorela1638-573X2020-06-013110.4000/corela.11106Activité définitoire folk et argumentation en contexte polémiqueAnne-Charlotte HussonThis article analyses folk definitory activities, understood as a set of utterances with a definitory dimension. These utterances manifest a relationship to language, others, and the world which is specific to folk speakers. The article sets itself apart from those analyses which, while looking mostly at the forms assumed by such activity, only consider them in terms of deficiency compared to their learned relatives, lexicographic definitions. This work puts forward some formal, textual, discursive, pragmatic, and enunciative features of folk definitions, and considers such definitions as a vantage point for heterogeneity in polemical contexts, more precisely in the context of the controversy about gender which takes place in the French public sphere between 2011 and 2014. By analysing the processes by which meanings become conflictual within this controversy, the author emphasises a key paradox, thus interrogating dialogal conceptions of discourse: although polemical discourse requires to maintain a relationship (albeit a very tenuous one) with the adversary, this fragile tether is also a way to establish the difference, and even incommensurability, between both sides of a controversy.http://journals.openedition.org/corela/11106heterogeneity – folk definitory activities – argumentation – meaning and conflict – controversy about gender in France
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne-Charlotte Husson
spellingShingle Anne-Charlotte Husson
Activité définitoire folk et argumentation en contexte polémique
Corela
heterogeneity – folk definitory activities – argumentation – meaning and conflict – controversy about gender in France
author_facet Anne-Charlotte Husson
author_sort Anne-Charlotte Husson
title Activité définitoire folk et argumentation en contexte polémique
title_short Activité définitoire folk et argumentation en contexte polémique
title_full Activité définitoire folk et argumentation en contexte polémique
title_fullStr Activité définitoire folk et argumentation en contexte polémique
title_full_unstemmed Activité définitoire folk et argumentation en contexte polémique
title_sort activité définitoire folk et argumentation en contexte polémique
publisher Cercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICO
series Corela
issn 1638-573X
publishDate 2020-06-01
description This article analyses folk definitory activities, understood as a set of utterances with a definitory dimension. These utterances manifest a relationship to language, others, and the world which is specific to folk speakers. The article sets itself apart from those analyses which, while looking mostly at the forms assumed by such activity, only consider them in terms of deficiency compared to their learned relatives, lexicographic definitions. This work puts forward some formal, textual, discursive, pragmatic, and enunciative features of folk definitions, and considers such definitions as a vantage point for heterogeneity in polemical contexts, more precisely in the context of the controversy about gender which takes place in the French public sphere between 2011 and 2014. By analysing the processes by which meanings become conflictual within this controversy, the author emphasises a key paradox, thus interrogating dialogal conceptions of discourse: although polemical discourse requires to maintain a relationship (albeit a very tenuous one) with the adversary, this fragile tether is also a way to establish the difference, and even incommensurability, between both sides of a controversy.
topic heterogeneity – folk definitory activities – argumentation – meaning and conflict – controversy about gender in France
url http://journals.openedition.org/corela/11106
work_keys_str_mv AT annecharlottehusson activitedefinitoirefolketargumentationencontextepolemique
_version_ 1724523483431436288