Derrida, Structuralism and Democracy

Deconstruction is a strategy for demonstrating the contribution of philosophy to achieving the meaning of democracy in the postmodern world. It seeks to establish philosophical principles consistent with the principle of tolerating others and democracy in the post-democracy world. Meanwhile, Derrida...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sasan Karamshahi, Alireza Aghahosseini, Seyed Javad Emam Jomezadeh, Ali Alihosseini
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Imam Sadiq University 2017-07-01
Series:دانش سیاسی
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pkn.journals.isu.ac.ir/article_2015_e33c0b5073d6ba357514504fe8337edc.pdf
id doaj-7bde9ebc9e58447580c6578c9e0813b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7bde9ebc9e58447580c6578c9e0813b92020-11-25T03:18:42ZfasImam Sadiq Universityدانش سیاسی2008-07432228-65942017-07-011311511702015Derrida, Structuralism and DemocracySasan Karamshahi0Alireza Aghahosseini1Seyed Javad Emam Jomezadeh2Ali Alihosseini3Ph.D. Candidate of Political Science in Isfahan UniversityFaculty member of Isfahan UniversityFaculty member of Isfahan UniversityFaculty member of Isfahan UniversityDeconstruction is a strategy for demonstrating the contribution of philosophy to achieving the meaning of democracy in the postmodern world. It seeks to establish philosophical principles consistent with the principle of tolerating others and democracy in the post-democracy world. Meanwhile, Derrida's ideas in the field of socio-political democracy, such as future democracy and its oncoming challenges, are also rooted in his philosophy. Hence, democracy and deconstruction are the two sides of a coin, and one cannot be understood without the other. This connection is unbreakable and necessary and pivotal to Derrida's thinking about philosophy and politics. The breakthrough has come to suggest new horizons with the critique of modern systems including Western democracies that marginalized forces on the frontiers of democracy can actively participate in determining their own destinies. Contrary to positive methods, the underlying breach does not have a relative relation with the ultimate clarity of the Western society, and it is considered to be the fruits of the linear maturity of history. On the contrary, with the critique of metaphysical systems, it is a strategic breakthrough, so that the inertia of the universe becomes the instrument of successive negotiation. As far as the subject of this article is concerned, it attempts to define the Western metaphysical breakdown, then it shows how Derrida has benefited from this strategy in order to open up the political blockade of Western democratization with ongoing openings. The study of the link between deconstructive philosophy and democracy and how they interact with each other will be the cornerstone of this article.http://pkn.journals.isu.ac.ir/article_2015_e33c0b5073d6ba357514504fe8337edc.pdfmetaphysics of presencedeconstructionliberal democracyfuture democracy
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sasan Karamshahi
Alireza Aghahosseini
Seyed Javad Emam Jomezadeh
Ali Alihosseini
spellingShingle Sasan Karamshahi
Alireza Aghahosseini
Seyed Javad Emam Jomezadeh
Ali Alihosseini
Derrida, Structuralism and Democracy
دانش سیاسی
metaphysics of presence
deconstruction
liberal democracy
future democracy
author_facet Sasan Karamshahi
Alireza Aghahosseini
Seyed Javad Emam Jomezadeh
Ali Alihosseini
author_sort Sasan Karamshahi
title Derrida, Structuralism and Democracy
title_short Derrida, Structuralism and Democracy
title_full Derrida, Structuralism and Democracy
title_fullStr Derrida, Structuralism and Democracy
title_full_unstemmed Derrida, Structuralism and Democracy
title_sort derrida, structuralism and democracy
publisher Imam Sadiq University
series دانش سیاسی
issn 2008-0743
2228-6594
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Deconstruction is a strategy for demonstrating the contribution of philosophy to achieving the meaning of democracy in the postmodern world. It seeks to establish philosophical principles consistent with the principle of tolerating others and democracy in the post-democracy world. Meanwhile, Derrida's ideas in the field of socio-political democracy, such as future democracy and its oncoming challenges, are also rooted in his philosophy. Hence, democracy and deconstruction are the two sides of a coin, and one cannot be understood without the other. This connection is unbreakable and necessary and pivotal to Derrida's thinking about philosophy and politics. The breakthrough has come to suggest new horizons with the critique of modern systems including Western democracies that marginalized forces on the frontiers of democracy can actively participate in determining their own destinies. Contrary to positive methods, the underlying breach does not have a relative relation with the ultimate clarity of the Western society, and it is considered to be the fruits of the linear maturity of history. On the contrary, with the critique of metaphysical systems, it is a strategic breakthrough, so that the inertia of the universe becomes the instrument of successive negotiation. As far as the subject of this article is concerned, it attempts to define the Western metaphysical breakdown, then it shows how Derrida has benefited from this strategy in order to open up the political blockade of Western democratization with ongoing openings. The study of the link between deconstructive philosophy and democracy and how they interact with each other will be the cornerstone of this article.
topic metaphysics of presence
deconstruction
liberal democracy
future democracy
url http://pkn.journals.isu.ac.ir/article_2015_e33c0b5073d6ba357514504fe8337edc.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sasankaramshahi derridastructuralismanddemocracy
AT alirezaaghahosseini derridastructuralismanddemocracy
AT seyedjavademamjomezadeh derridastructuralismanddemocracy
AT alialihosseini derridastructuralismanddemocracy
_version_ 1724626116925194240