Derrida, Structuralism and Democracy
Deconstruction is a strategy for demonstrating the contribution of philosophy to achieving the meaning of democracy in the postmodern world. It seeks to establish philosophical principles consistent with the principle of tolerating others and democracy in the post-democracy world. Meanwhile, Derrida...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Imam Sadiq University
2017-07-01
|
Series: | دانش سیاسی |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://pkn.journals.isu.ac.ir/article_2015_e33c0b5073d6ba357514504fe8337edc.pdf |
id |
doaj-7bde9ebc9e58447580c6578c9e0813b9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7bde9ebc9e58447580c6578c9e0813b92020-11-25T03:18:42ZfasImam Sadiq Universityدانش سیاسی2008-07432228-65942017-07-011311511702015Derrida, Structuralism and DemocracySasan Karamshahi0Alireza Aghahosseini1Seyed Javad Emam Jomezadeh2Ali Alihosseini3Ph.D. Candidate of Political Science in Isfahan UniversityFaculty member of Isfahan UniversityFaculty member of Isfahan UniversityFaculty member of Isfahan UniversityDeconstruction is a strategy for demonstrating the contribution of philosophy to achieving the meaning of democracy in the postmodern world. It seeks to establish philosophical principles consistent with the principle of tolerating others and democracy in the post-democracy world. Meanwhile, Derrida's ideas in the field of socio-political democracy, such as future democracy and its oncoming challenges, are also rooted in his philosophy. Hence, democracy and deconstruction are the two sides of a coin, and one cannot be understood without the other. This connection is unbreakable and necessary and pivotal to Derrida's thinking about philosophy and politics. The breakthrough has come to suggest new horizons with the critique of modern systems including Western democracies that marginalized forces on the frontiers of democracy can actively participate in determining their own destinies. Contrary to positive methods, the underlying breach does not have a relative relation with the ultimate clarity of the Western society, and it is considered to be the fruits of the linear maturity of history. On the contrary, with the critique of metaphysical systems, it is a strategic breakthrough, so that the inertia of the universe becomes the instrument of successive negotiation. As far as the subject of this article is concerned, it attempts to define the Western metaphysical breakdown, then it shows how Derrida has benefited from this strategy in order to open up the political blockade of Western democratization with ongoing openings. The study of the link between deconstructive philosophy and democracy and how they interact with each other will be the cornerstone of this article.http://pkn.journals.isu.ac.ir/article_2015_e33c0b5073d6ba357514504fe8337edc.pdfmetaphysics of presencedeconstructionliberal democracyfuture democracy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fas |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sasan Karamshahi Alireza Aghahosseini Seyed Javad Emam Jomezadeh Ali Alihosseini |
spellingShingle |
Sasan Karamshahi Alireza Aghahosseini Seyed Javad Emam Jomezadeh Ali Alihosseini Derrida, Structuralism and Democracy دانش سیاسی metaphysics of presence deconstruction liberal democracy future democracy |
author_facet |
Sasan Karamshahi Alireza Aghahosseini Seyed Javad Emam Jomezadeh Ali Alihosseini |
author_sort |
Sasan Karamshahi |
title |
Derrida, Structuralism and Democracy |
title_short |
Derrida, Structuralism and Democracy |
title_full |
Derrida, Structuralism and Democracy |
title_fullStr |
Derrida, Structuralism and Democracy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Derrida, Structuralism and Democracy |
title_sort |
derrida, structuralism and democracy |
publisher |
Imam Sadiq University |
series |
دانش سیاسی |
issn |
2008-0743 2228-6594 |
publishDate |
2017-07-01 |
description |
Deconstruction is a strategy for demonstrating the contribution of philosophy to achieving the meaning of democracy in the postmodern world. It seeks to establish philosophical principles consistent with the principle of tolerating others and democracy in the post-democracy world. Meanwhile, Derrida's ideas in the field of socio-political democracy, such as future democracy and its oncoming challenges, are also rooted in his philosophy. Hence, democracy and deconstruction are the two sides of a coin, and one cannot be understood without the other. This connection is unbreakable and necessary and pivotal to Derrida's thinking about philosophy and politics. The breakthrough has come to suggest new horizons with the critique of modern systems including Western democracies that marginalized forces on the frontiers of democracy can actively participate in determining their own destinies. Contrary to positive methods, the underlying breach does not have a relative relation with the ultimate clarity of the Western society, and it is considered to be the fruits of the linear maturity of history. On the contrary, with the critique of metaphysical systems, it is a strategic breakthrough, so that the inertia of the universe becomes the instrument of successive negotiation. As far as the subject of this article is concerned, it attempts to define the Western metaphysical breakdown, then it shows how Derrida has benefited from this strategy in order to open up the political blockade of Western democratization with ongoing openings. The study of the link between deconstructive philosophy and democracy and how they interact with each other will be the cornerstone of this article. |
topic |
metaphysics of presence deconstruction liberal democracy future democracy |
url |
http://pkn.journals.isu.ac.ir/article_2015_e33c0b5073d6ba357514504fe8337edc.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sasankaramshahi derridastructuralismanddemocracy AT alirezaaghahosseini derridastructuralismanddemocracy AT seyedjavademamjomezadeh derridastructuralismanddemocracy AT alialihosseini derridastructuralismanddemocracy |
_version_ |
1724626116925194240 |