Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy and Sex Chromosomal Anomalies in a Pregnant Woman With Mosaicism for Turner Syndrome—Applications and Advantages of Cell-Based NIPT

Background: Cell-free NIPT and cell-based NIPT are risk-free testing options using maternal blood samples to screen for fetal aneuploidies, but the methods differ. For cell-free NIPT, the fetal fraction of cell-free DNA in plasma is analyzed with a high background of maternal DNA. In contrast, for c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Line Dahl Jeppesen, Lotte Hatt, Ripudaman Singh, Palle Schelde, Lotte Andreasen, Sara Markholt, Dorte L. Lildballe, Ida Vogel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Genetics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.741752/full
id doaj-7bdc4b9dc2404e16a69b3606a25e3759
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7bdc4b9dc2404e16a69b3606a25e37592021-09-14T05:56:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212021-09-011210.3389/fgene.2021.741752741752Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy and Sex Chromosomal Anomalies in a Pregnant Woman With Mosaicism for Turner Syndrome—Applications and Advantages of Cell-Based NIPTLine Dahl Jeppesen0Line Dahl Jeppesen1Lotte Hatt2Ripudaman Singh3Palle Schelde4Lotte Andreasen5Sara Markholt6Dorte L. Lildballe7Dorte L. Lildballe8Ida Vogel9Ida Vogel10ARCEDI Biotech, Vejle, DenmarkDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkARCEDI Biotech, Vejle, DenmarkARCEDI Biotech, Vejle, DenmarkARCEDI Biotech, Vejle, DenmarkDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, DenmarkDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, DenmarkDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkDepartment of Molecular Medicine (MOMA), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, DenmarkDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, DenmarkBackground: Cell-free NIPT and cell-based NIPT are risk-free testing options using maternal blood samples to screen for fetal aneuploidies, but the methods differ. For cell-free NIPT, the fetal fraction of cell-free DNA in plasma is analyzed with a high background of maternal DNA. In contrast, for cell-based NIPT, a limited number of the rare, intact fetal cells are isolated for the genetic analysis. This case demonstrates the differences regarding testing for fetal sex-chromosomes anomalies (SCAs) between these two tests.Materials and Methods: A pregnant woman with mosaicism for Turner syndrome opted for NIPT in first trimester. For the cell-free NIPT analysis, DNA extraction, genome-wide massive parallel sequencing, and data analysis were carried out as described by the kit manufacturer (Illumina©, San Diego, CA, USA). For cell-based NIPT, the first sample gave no result, but the woman consented to repeat cell-based NIPT. After whole genome amplification and STR analysis, fetal DNA from three individual fetal cells was subjected to chromosomal microarray (aCGH, Agilent oligoarray, 180 kb).Results: Fetal fraction was 7%, and cell-free NIPT showed 2 copies of chromosomes 13, 18, and 21 and a decreased proportion of chromosome X, suggestive of fetal Turner syndrome. In contrast, the cell-based NIPT result showed no aneuploidy and two X-chromosomes in the fetus.Conclusion: cell-based NIPT may provide a non-invasive testing option to screen for SCAs in women with mosaicism for monosomy-X in blood, where cell-free NIPT cannot discriminate whether the X-loss is maternal or fetal.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.741752/fullcell-based noninvasive prenatal testingsex chromosomal aneuploidiesturner mosaicnon-invasive prenatal testingextravillous trophoblast
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Line Dahl Jeppesen
Line Dahl Jeppesen
Lotte Hatt
Ripudaman Singh
Palle Schelde
Lotte Andreasen
Sara Markholt
Dorte L. Lildballe
Dorte L. Lildballe
Ida Vogel
Ida Vogel
spellingShingle Line Dahl Jeppesen
Line Dahl Jeppesen
Lotte Hatt
Ripudaman Singh
Palle Schelde
Lotte Andreasen
Sara Markholt
Dorte L. Lildballe
Dorte L. Lildballe
Ida Vogel
Ida Vogel
Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy and Sex Chromosomal Anomalies in a Pregnant Woman With Mosaicism for Turner Syndrome—Applications and Advantages of Cell-Based NIPT
Frontiers in Genetics
cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing
sex chromosomal aneuploidies
turner mosaic
non-invasive prenatal testing
extravillous trophoblast
author_facet Line Dahl Jeppesen
Line Dahl Jeppesen
Lotte Hatt
Ripudaman Singh
Palle Schelde
Lotte Andreasen
Sara Markholt
Dorte L. Lildballe
Dorte L. Lildballe
Ida Vogel
Ida Vogel
author_sort Line Dahl Jeppesen
title Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy and Sex Chromosomal Anomalies in a Pregnant Woman With Mosaicism for Turner Syndrome—Applications and Advantages of Cell-Based NIPT
title_short Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy and Sex Chromosomal Anomalies in a Pregnant Woman With Mosaicism for Turner Syndrome—Applications and Advantages of Cell-Based NIPT
title_full Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy and Sex Chromosomal Anomalies in a Pregnant Woman With Mosaicism for Turner Syndrome—Applications and Advantages of Cell-Based NIPT
title_fullStr Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy and Sex Chromosomal Anomalies in a Pregnant Woman With Mosaicism for Turner Syndrome—Applications and Advantages of Cell-Based NIPT
title_full_unstemmed Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy and Sex Chromosomal Anomalies in a Pregnant Woman With Mosaicism for Turner Syndrome—Applications and Advantages of Cell-Based NIPT
title_sort screening for fetal aneuploidy and sex chromosomal anomalies in a pregnant woman with mosaicism for turner syndrome—applications and advantages of cell-based nipt
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Genetics
issn 1664-8021
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Background: Cell-free NIPT and cell-based NIPT are risk-free testing options using maternal blood samples to screen for fetal aneuploidies, but the methods differ. For cell-free NIPT, the fetal fraction of cell-free DNA in plasma is analyzed with a high background of maternal DNA. In contrast, for cell-based NIPT, a limited number of the rare, intact fetal cells are isolated for the genetic analysis. This case demonstrates the differences regarding testing for fetal sex-chromosomes anomalies (SCAs) between these two tests.Materials and Methods: A pregnant woman with mosaicism for Turner syndrome opted for NIPT in first trimester. For the cell-free NIPT analysis, DNA extraction, genome-wide massive parallel sequencing, and data analysis were carried out as described by the kit manufacturer (Illumina©, San Diego, CA, USA). For cell-based NIPT, the first sample gave no result, but the woman consented to repeat cell-based NIPT. After whole genome amplification and STR analysis, fetal DNA from three individual fetal cells was subjected to chromosomal microarray (aCGH, Agilent oligoarray, 180 kb).Results: Fetal fraction was 7%, and cell-free NIPT showed 2 copies of chromosomes 13, 18, and 21 and a decreased proportion of chromosome X, suggestive of fetal Turner syndrome. In contrast, the cell-based NIPT result showed no aneuploidy and two X-chromosomes in the fetus.Conclusion: cell-based NIPT may provide a non-invasive testing option to screen for SCAs in women with mosaicism for monosomy-X in blood, where cell-free NIPT cannot discriminate whether the X-loss is maternal or fetal.
topic cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing
sex chromosomal aneuploidies
turner mosaic
non-invasive prenatal testing
extravillous trophoblast
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.741752/full
work_keys_str_mv AT linedahljeppesen screeningforfetalaneuploidyandsexchromosomalanomaliesinapregnantwomanwithmosaicismforturnersyndromeapplicationsandadvantagesofcellbasednipt
AT linedahljeppesen screeningforfetalaneuploidyandsexchromosomalanomaliesinapregnantwomanwithmosaicismforturnersyndromeapplicationsandadvantagesofcellbasednipt
AT lottehatt screeningforfetalaneuploidyandsexchromosomalanomaliesinapregnantwomanwithmosaicismforturnersyndromeapplicationsandadvantagesofcellbasednipt
AT ripudamansingh screeningforfetalaneuploidyandsexchromosomalanomaliesinapregnantwomanwithmosaicismforturnersyndromeapplicationsandadvantagesofcellbasednipt
AT palleschelde screeningforfetalaneuploidyandsexchromosomalanomaliesinapregnantwomanwithmosaicismforturnersyndromeapplicationsandadvantagesofcellbasednipt
AT lotteandreasen screeningforfetalaneuploidyandsexchromosomalanomaliesinapregnantwomanwithmosaicismforturnersyndromeapplicationsandadvantagesofcellbasednipt
AT saramarkholt screeningforfetalaneuploidyandsexchromosomalanomaliesinapregnantwomanwithmosaicismforturnersyndromeapplicationsandadvantagesofcellbasednipt
AT dortellildballe screeningforfetalaneuploidyandsexchromosomalanomaliesinapregnantwomanwithmosaicismforturnersyndromeapplicationsandadvantagesofcellbasednipt
AT dortellildballe screeningforfetalaneuploidyandsexchromosomalanomaliesinapregnantwomanwithmosaicismforturnersyndromeapplicationsandadvantagesofcellbasednipt
AT idavogel screeningforfetalaneuploidyandsexchromosomalanomaliesinapregnantwomanwithmosaicismforturnersyndromeapplicationsandadvantagesofcellbasednipt
AT idavogel screeningforfetalaneuploidyandsexchromosomalanomaliesinapregnantwomanwithmosaicismforturnersyndromeapplicationsandadvantagesofcellbasednipt
_version_ 1717380062830919680