Technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjects

This study compares the shooting basketball efficacy from short, middle and long distance of two interventions applied to untrained youth: one without offering any type of information (NI) and another with instructions and knowledge of performance feedback (I+CE). Two groups formed by 20 physical ed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Claramunt, N. Balagué
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asociación Española de Ciencias del Deporte 2011-06-01
Series:European Journal of Human Movement
Online Access:https://eurjhm.com/index.php/eurjhm/article/view/257
id doaj-7bc95e59ce024cc2a076cc1453a44b2e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7bc95e59ce024cc2a076cc1453a44b2e2020-11-25T03:02:15ZengAsociación Española de Ciencias del DeporteEuropean Journal of Human Movement2386-40952011-06-0126Technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjectsC. ClaramuntN. BalaguéThis study compares the shooting basketball efficacy from short, middle and long distance of two interventions applied to untrained youth: one without offering any type of information (NI) and another with instructions and knowledge of performance feedback (I+CE). Two groups formed by 20 physical education students (E group) and 17 young basketball players (B group) were analysed. All participants shot 20 times from each distance in both experimental situations. Half of the participants followed the sequence NI – I+CE and the other I+CE – NI. In E group the efficacy in the NI intervention was 40,33% (±13,88%) and in the I+CE intervention 34,42% (±13,97%), being the difference significantly different (t = 2,97; p<0,01). In the B group the efficacy of the NI intervention was 47,4% (±9,05%) and in the I+CE intervention 44,12% (±12,06 %). The analysis by shooting positions show only significant differences (in both groups) in short distances (p<0,05). The NI intervention is more effective, especially in short shooting distances, than the I+CE intervention in young specifically untrained population. Key Words: instructions, feedback, knowledge of performance, basketball shooting, dynamical systems theory. https://eurjhm.com/index.php/eurjhm/article/view/257
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C. Claramunt
N. Balagué
spellingShingle C. Claramunt
N. Balagué
Technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjects
European Journal of Human Movement
author_facet C. Claramunt
N. Balagué
author_sort C. Claramunt
title Technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjects
title_short Technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjects
title_full Technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjects
title_fullStr Technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjects
title_full_unstemmed Technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjects
title_sort technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjects
publisher Asociación Española de Ciencias del Deporte
series European Journal of Human Movement
issn 2386-4095
publishDate 2011-06-01
description This study compares the shooting basketball efficacy from short, middle and long distance of two interventions applied to untrained youth: one without offering any type of information (NI) and another with instructions and knowledge of performance feedback (I+CE). Two groups formed by 20 physical education students (E group) and 17 young basketball players (B group) were analysed. All participants shot 20 times from each distance in both experimental situations. Half of the participants followed the sequence NI – I+CE and the other I+CE – NI. In E group the efficacy in the NI intervention was 40,33% (±13,88%) and in the I+CE intervention 34,42% (±13,97%), being the difference significantly different (t = 2,97; p<0,01). In the B group the efficacy of the NI intervention was 47,4% (±9,05%) and in the I+CE intervention 44,12% (±12,06 %). The analysis by shooting positions show only significant differences (in both groups) in short distances (p<0,05). The NI intervention is more effective, especially in short shooting distances, than the I+CE intervention in young specifically untrained population. Key Words: instructions, feedback, knowledge of performance, basketball shooting, dynamical systems theory.
url https://eurjhm.com/index.php/eurjhm/article/view/257
work_keys_str_mv AT cclaramunt technicalinstructionsandfeedbackreducetheshootingeffectualyinnotrainedyoungsubjects
AT nbalague technicalinstructionsandfeedbackreducetheshootingeffectualyinnotrainedyoungsubjects
_version_ 1724690633283600384