Technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjects
This study compares the shooting basketball efficacy from short, middle and long distance of two interventions applied to untrained youth: one without offering any type of information (NI) and another with instructions and knowledge of performance feedback (I+CE). Two groups formed by 20 physical ed...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Asociación Española de Ciencias del Deporte
2011-06-01
|
Series: | European Journal of Human Movement |
Online Access: | https://eurjhm.com/index.php/eurjhm/article/view/257 |
id |
doaj-7bc95e59ce024cc2a076cc1453a44b2e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7bc95e59ce024cc2a076cc1453a44b2e2020-11-25T03:02:15ZengAsociación Española de Ciencias del DeporteEuropean Journal of Human Movement2386-40952011-06-0126Technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjectsC. ClaramuntN. BalaguéThis study compares the shooting basketball efficacy from short, middle and long distance of two interventions applied to untrained youth: one without offering any type of information (NI) and another with instructions and knowledge of performance feedback (I+CE). Two groups formed by 20 physical education students (E group) and 17 young basketball players (B group) were analysed. All participants shot 20 times from each distance in both experimental situations. Half of the participants followed the sequence NI – I+CE and the other I+CE – NI. In E group the efficacy in the NI intervention was 40,33% (±13,88%) and in the I+CE intervention 34,42% (±13,97%), being the difference significantly different (t = 2,97; p<0,01). In the B group the efficacy of the NI intervention was 47,4% (±9,05%) and in the I+CE intervention 44,12% (±12,06 %). The analysis by shooting positions show only significant differences (in both groups) in short distances (p<0,05). The NI intervention is more effective, especially in short shooting distances, than the I+CE intervention in young specifically untrained population. Key Words: instructions, feedback, knowledge of performance, basketball shooting, dynamical systems theory. https://eurjhm.com/index.php/eurjhm/article/view/257 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
C. Claramunt N. Balagué |
spellingShingle |
C. Claramunt N. Balagué Technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjects European Journal of Human Movement |
author_facet |
C. Claramunt N. Balagué |
author_sort |
C. Claramunt |
title |
Technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjects |
title_short |
Technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjects |
title_full |
Technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjects |
title_fullStr |
Technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjects |
title_sort |
technical instructions and feedback reduce the shooting effectualy in no trained young subjects |
publisher |
Asociación Española de Ciencias del Deporte |
series |
European Journal of Human Movement |
issn |
2386-4095 |
publishDate |
2011-06-01 |
description |
This study compares the shooting basketball efficacy from short, middle and long distance of two interventions applied to untrained youth: one without offering any type of information (NI) and another with instructions and knowledge of performance feedback (I+CE). Two groups formed by 20 physical education students (E group) and 17 young basketball players (B group) were analysed. All participants shot 20 times from each distance in both experimental situations. Half of the participants followed the sequence NI – I+CE and the other I+CE – NI. In E group the efficacy in the NI intervention was 40,33% (±13,88%) and in the I+CE intervention 34,42% (±13,97%), being the difference significantly different (t = 2,97; p<0,01). In the B group the efficacy of the NI intervention was 47,4% (±9,05%) and in the I+CE intervention 44,12% (±12,06 %). The analysis by shooting positions show only significant differences (in both groups) in short distances (p<0,05). The NI intervention is more effective, especially in short shooting distances, than the I+CE intervention in young specifically untrained population.
Key Words: instructions, feedback, knowledge of performance, basketball shooting, dynamical systems theory.
|
url |
https://eurjhm.com/index.php/eurjhm/article/view/257 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cclaramunt technicalinstructionsandfeedbackreducetheshootingeffectualyinnotrainedyoungsubjects AT nbalague technicalinstructionsandfeedbackreducetheshootingeffectualyinnotrainedyoungsubjects |
_version_ |
1724690633283600384 |