Two Controversial Passages in Damascius (<i>In Phd.</i> I 275–292 and II 28)
Damascius’ comments on the theory of recollection may well come from a lost work of Plutarch, to judge from the structure and sequence of the arguments.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Duke University
2012-08-01
|
Series: | Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies |
Online Access: | http://grbs.library.duke.edu/article/view/14321 |
id |
doaj-7bba0afe91f44417aa16b78b8ccdb00d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7bba0afe91f44417aa16b78b8ccdb00d2021-09-02T06:40:39ZengDuke UniversityGreek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies0017-39162159-31592012-08-0152346949213651Two Controversial Passages in Damascius (<i>In Phd.</i> I 275–292 and II 28)Geert RoskamDamascius’ comments on the theory of recollection may well come from a lost work of Plutarch, to judge from the structure and sequence of the arguments.http://grbs.library.duke.edu/article/view/14321 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Geert Roskam |
spellingShingle |
Geert Roskam Two Controversial Passages in Damascius (<i>In Phd.</i> I 275–292 and II 28) Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies |
author_facet |
Geert Roskam |
author_sort |
Geert Roskam |
title |
Two Controversial Passages in Damascius (<i>In Phd.</i> I 275–292 and II 28) |
title_short |
Two Controversial Passages in Damascius (<i>In Phd.</i> I 275–292 and II 28) |
title_full |
Two Controversial Passages in Damascius (<i>In Phd.</i> I 275–292 and II 28) |
title_fullStr |
Two Controversial Passages in Damascius (<i>In Phd.</i> I 275–292 and II 28) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Two Controversial Passages in Damascius (<i>In Phd.</i> I 275–292 and II 28) |
title_sort |
two controversial passages in damascius (<i>in phd.</i> i 275–292 and ii 28) |
publisher |
Duke University |
series |
Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies |
issn |
0017-3916 2159-3159 |
publishDate |
2012-08-01 |
description |
Damascius’ comments on the theory of recollection may well come from a lost work of Plutarch, to judge from the structure and sequence of the arguments. |
url |
http://grbs.library.duke.edu/article/view/14321 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT geertroskam twocontroversialpassagesindamasciusiinphdii275292andii28 |
_version_ |
1721178863904489472 |