Do climate simulations from models forced by averaged sea surface temperatures represent actual dynamics?

Recently atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs) forced by observed sea surface temperatures (SSTs) have offered the possibility of studying climate variability over periods ranging from years to decades. Such models represent and alternative to fully coupled asynchronous atmosphere ocean mod...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. J. Roebber, A. A. Tsonis, J. B. Elsner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 1997-01-01
Series:Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
Online Access:http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/4/93/1997/npg-4-93-1997.pdf
id doaj-7bb216dad303444d9529301d22b756bc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7bb216dad303444d9529301d22b756bc2020-11-24T20:41:16ZengCopernicus PublicationsNonlinear Processes in Geophysics1023-58091607-79461997-01-014293100Do climate simulations from models forced by averaged sea surface temperatures represent actual dynamics?P. J. RoebberA. A. TsonisJ. B. ElsnerRecently atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs) forced by observed sea surface temperatures (SSTs) have offered the possibility of studying climate variability over periods ranging from years to decades. Such models represent and alternative to fully coupled asynchronous atmosphere ocean models whose long term integration remains problematic. Here, the degree of the approximation represented by this approach is investigated from a conceptual point of view by comparing the dynamical properties of a low order coupled atmosphere-ocean model to those of the atmospheric component of the same model when forced with monthly values of SST derived from the fully coupled simulation. The low order modelling approach is undertaken with the expectation that it may reveal general principles concerning the dynamical behaviour of the forced versus coupled systems; it is not expected that such an approach will determine the details of these differences, for which higher order modelling studies will be required. We discover that even though attractor (global) averages may be similar, local dynamics and the resultant variability and predictability characteristics differ substantially. These results suggest that conclusions concerning regional climatic variability (in time as well as space) drawn from forced modelling approaches may be contaminated by an inherently unquantifiable error. It is therefore recommended that this possibility be carefully investigated using state-of-the-art coupled AGCMs.http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/4/93/1997/npg-4-93-1997.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P. J. Roebber
A. A. Tsonis
J. B. Elsner
spellingShingle P. J. Roebber
A. A. Tsonis
J. B. Elsner
Do climate simulations from models forced by averaged sea surface temperatures represent actual dynamics?
Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
author_facet P. J. Roebber
A. A. Tsonis
J. B. Elsner
author_sort P. J. Roebber
title Do climate simulations from models forced by averaged sea surface temperatures represent actual dynamics?
title_short Do climate simulations from models forced by averaged sea surface temperatures represent actual dynamics?
title_full Do climate simulations from models forced by averaged sea surface temperatures represent actual dynamics?
title_fullStr Do climate simulations from models forced by averaged sea surface temperatures represent actual dynamics?
title_full_unstemmed Do climate simulations from models forced by averaged sea surface temperatures represent actual dynamics?
title_sort do climate simulations from models forced by averaged sea surface temperatures represent actual dynamics?
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
issn 1023-5809
1607-7946
publishDate 1997-01-01
description Recently atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs) forced by observed sea surface temperatures (SSTs) have offered the possibility of studying climate variability over periods ranging from years to decades. Such models represent and alternative to fully coupled asynchronous atmosphere ocean models whose long term integration remains problematic. Here, the degree of the approximation represented by this approach is investigated from a conceptual point of view by comparing the dynamical properties of a low order coupled atmosphere-ocean model to those of the atmospheric component of the same model when forced with monthly values of SST derived from the fully coupled simulation. The low order modelling approach is undertaken with the expectation that it may reveal general principles concerning the dynamical behaviour of the forced versus coupled systems; it is not expected that such an approach will determine the details of these differences, for which higher order modelling studies will be required. We discover that even though attractor (global) averages may be similar, local dynamics and the resultant variability and predictability characteristics differ substantially. These results suggest that conclusions concerning regional climatic variability (in time as well as space) drawn from forced modelling approaches may be contaminated by an inherently unquantifiable error. It is therefore recommended that this possibility be carefully investigated using state-of-the-art coupled AGCMs.
url http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/4/93/1997/npg-4-93-1997.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pjroebber doclimatesimulationsfrommodelsforcedbyaveragedseasurfacetemperaturesrepresentactualdynamics
AT aatsonis doclimatesimulationsfrommodelsforcedbyaveragedseasurfacetemperaturesrepresentactualdynamics
AT jbelsner doclimatesimulationsfrommodelsforcedbyaveragedseasurfacetemperaturesrepresentactualdynamics
_version_ 1716825782310928384