Scandalising media freedom: Resurrection of an ancient contempt

The ancient charge of ‘scandalising the court’ (publications aiming at lowering the authority of the court) has had a resurgence in Australia over the past decade, at the very time judges and magistrates have developed an inclination to sue for defamation. The combined effect is to send warning to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mark Pearson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pacific Media Centre 2008-04-01
Series:Pacific Journalism Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/923
id doaj-7ba290a2bea04522b326d9b0fc1ebe46
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7ba290a2bea04522b326d9b0fc1ebe462020-11-25T03:17:41ZengPacific Media CentrePacific Journalism Review1023-94992324-20352008-04-0114110.24135/pjr.v14i1.923Scandalising media freedom: Resurrection of an ancient contemptMark Pearson The ancient charge of ‘scandalising the court’ (publications aiming at lowering the authority of the court) has had a resurgence in Australia over the past decade, at the very time judges and magistrates have developed an inclination to sue for defamation. The combined effect is to send warning to media organisations to take care when criticising judical officers or the judical process, particularly if that involves implying some improper motive on the part of a judge or magistrate. In New Zealand there have been some isloated but significant threats and cases, particularly in the volatile area of family law. This article reviews some recent Australian and New Zealand cases where a charge of scandalising the court has been either threatend or enforced and considers the implications for freedom of media expression in a new era of anti-terrorism when important questions are being asked about the fairness of justice processes.  https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/923contempt of courtjustice systemmedia freedom
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark Pearson
spellingShingle Mark Pearson
Scandalising media freedom: Resurrection of an ancient contempt
Pacific Journalism Review
contempt of court
justice system
media freedom
author_facet Mark Pearson
author_sort Mark Pearson
title Scandalising media freedom: Resurrection of an ancient contempt
title_short Scandalising media freedom: Resurrection of an ancient contempt
title_full Scandalising media freedom: Resurrection of an ancient contempt
title_fullStr Scandalising media freedom: Resurrection of an ancient contempt
title_full_unstemmed Scandalising media freedom: Resurrection of an ancient contempt
title_sort scandalising media freedom: resurrection of an ancient contempt
publisher Pacific Media Centre
series Pacific Journalism Review
issn 1023-9499
2324-2035
publishDate 2008-04-01
description The ancient charge of ‘scandalising the court’ (publications aiming at lowering the authority of the court) has had a resurgence in Australia over the past decade, at the very time judges and magistrates have developed an inclination to sue for defamation. The combined effect is to send warning to media organisations to take care when criticising judical officers or the judical process, particularly if that involves implying some improper motive on the part of a judge or magistrate. In New Zealand there have been some isloated but significant threats and cases, particularly in the volatile area of family law. This article reviews some recent Australian and New Zealand cases where a charge of scandalising the court has been either threatend or enforced and considers the implications for freedom of media expression in a new era of anti-terrorism when important questions are being asked about the fairness of justice processes. 
topic contempt of court
justice system
media freedom
url https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/923
work_keys_str_mv AT markpearson scandalisingmediafreedomresurrectionofanancientcontempt
_version_ 1724630645088452608