A novel method based on unbiased correlations tests for covariate selection in nonlinear mixed effects models: The COSSAC approach

Abstract Building a covariate model is a crucial task in population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in order to understand the determinants of the interindividual variability. Identifying a good covariate model usually requires many runs. Several procedures have been proposed in the past to au...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Géraldine Ayral, Jean‐François Si Abdallah, Claude Magnard, Jonathan Chauvin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-04-01
Series:CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12612
id doaj-7b9d9abee4db473faa6b5d2a277cb19b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7b9d9abee4db473faa6b5d2a277cb19b2021-05-03T08:07:41ZengWileyCPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology2163-83062021-04-0110431832910.1002/psp4.12612A novel method based on unbiased correlations tests for covariate selection in nonlinear mixed effects models: The COSSAC approachGéraldine Ayral0Jean‐François Si Abdallah1Claude Magnard2Jonathan Chauvin3Lixoft Antony FranceLixoft Antony FranceLixoft Antony FranceLixoft Antony FranceAbstract Building a covariate model is a crucial task in population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in order to understand the determinants of the interindividual variability. Identifying a good covariate model usually requires many runs. Several procedures have been proposed in the past to automatize this task. The most commonly used is Stepwise Covariate Modeling (SCM). Here, we present a novel stepwise method based on statistical tests between individual parameters sampled from their conditional distribution and the covariates. This strategy, called the COnditional Sampling use for Stepwise Approach based on Correlation tests (COSSAC), makes use of the information contained in the current model to choose which parameter‐covariate relationship to try next. This strategy greatly reduces the number of covariate models tested, while retaining on its search path the models improving the log‐likelihood (LL). In this article, we detail the COSSAC method and its implementation in Monolix, and evaluate its performance. The performance was assessed by comparing COSSAC to the traditional SCM method on 17 representative data sets. For the large majority of cases (15 out of 17), the final covariate model is identical (11 cases) or very similar (4 cases with LL differences less than 3.84) with both procedures. Yet, COSSAC requires between 2 to 20 times fewer runs than SCM. This represents a decisive speed up, especially for models that take long to run and would not be tractable using the SCM method.https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12612
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Géraldine Ayral
Jean‐François Si Abdallah
Claude Magnard
Jonathan Chauvin
spellingShingle Géraldine Ayral
Jean‐François Si Abdallah
Claude Magnard
Jonathan Chauvin
A novel method based on unbiased correlations tests for covariate selection in nonlinear mixed effects models: The COSSAC approach
CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology
author_facet Géraldine Ayral
Jean‐François Si Abdallah
Claude Magnard
Jonathan Chauvin
author_sort Géraldine Ayral
title A novel method based on unbiased correlations tests for covariate selection in nonlinear mixed effects models: The COSSAC approach
title_short A novel method based on unbiased correlations tests for covariate selection in nonlinear mixed effects models: The COSSAC approach
title_full A novel method based on unbiased correlations tests for covariate selection in nonlinear mixed effects models: The COSSAC approach
title_fullStr A novel method based on unbiased correlations tests for covariate selection in nonlinear mixed effects models: The COSSAC approach
title_full_unstemmed A novel method based on unbiased correlations tests for covariate selection in nonlinear mixed effects models: The COSSAC approach
title_sort novel method based on unbiased correlations tests for covariate selection in nonlinear mixed effects models: the cossac approach
publisher Wiley
series CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology
issn 2163-8306
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Abstract Building a covariate model is a crucial task in population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in order to understand the determinants of the interindividual variability. Identifying a good covariate model usually requires many runs. Several procedures have been proposed in the past to automatize this task. The most commonly used is Stepwise Covariate Modeling (SCM). Here, we present a novel stepwise method based on statistical tests between individual parameters sampled from their conditional distribution and the covariates. This strategy, called the COnditional Sampling use for Stepwise Approach based on Correlation tests (COSSAC), makes use of the information contained in the current model to choose which parameter‐covariate relationship to try next. This strategy greatly reduces the number of covariate models tested, while retaining on its search path the models improving the log‐likelihood (LL). In this article, we detail the COSSAC method and its implementation in Monolix, and evaluate its performance. The performance was assessed by comparing COSSAC to the traditional SCM method on 17 representative data sets. For the large majority of cases (15 out of 17), the final covariate model is identical (11 cases) or very similar (4 cases with LL differences less than 3.84) with both procedures. Yet, COSSAC requires between 2 to 20 times fewer runs than SCM. This represents a decisive speed up, especially for models that take long to run and would not be tractable using the SCM method.
url https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12612
work_keys_str_mv AT geraldineayral anovelmethodbasedonunbiasedcorrelationstestsforcovariateselectioninnonlinearmixedeffectsmodelsthecossacapproach
AT jeanfrancoissiabdallah anovelmethodbasedonunbiasedcorrelationstestsforcovariateselectioninnonlinearmixedeffectsmodelsthecossacapproach
AT claudemagnard anovelmethodbasedonunbiasedcorrelationstestsforcovariateselectioninnonlinearmixedeffectsmodelsthecossacapproach
AT jonathanchauvin anovelmethodbasedonunbiasedcorrelationstestsforcovariateselectioninnonlinearmixedeffectsmodelsthecossacapproach
AT geraldineayral novelmethodbasedonunbiasedcorrelationstestsforcovariateselectioninnonlinearmixedeffectsmodelsthecossacapproach
AT jeanfrancoissiabdallah novelmethodbasedonunbiasedcorrelationstestsforcovariateselectioninnonlinearmixedeffectsmodelsthecossacapproach
AT claudemagnard novelmethodbasedonunbiasedcorrelationstestsforcovariateselectioninnonlinearmixedeffectsmodelsthecossacapproach
AT jonathanchauvin novelmethodbasedonunbiasedcorrelationstestsforcovariateselectioninnonlinearmixedeffectsmodelsthecossacapproach
_version_ 1721482654539317248