Comparison of two scales for evaluation of smile and dental attractiveness

OBJECTIVE: To compare the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the simplified Q-sort method used to investigate the highest level of agreement among dentists, orthodontists and laypeople when assessing smile and dental attractiveness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An album containing 258 photos of 86 individuals...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pedro Lima Emmerich Oliveira, Andrea Fonseca Jardim da Motta, Clarice Julia Guerra, José Nelson Mucha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dental Press Editora 2015-04-01
Series:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512015000200042&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-7b87a736cf964f8dab298ebff1e59cbf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7b87a736cf964f8dab298ebff1e59cbf2020-11-25T01:24:00ZengDental Press Editora Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 2177-67092015-04-01202424810.1590/2176-9451.20.2.042-048.oarS2176-94512015000200042Comparison of two scales for evaluation of smile and dental attractivenessPedro Lima Emmerich OliveiraAndrea Fonseca Jardim da MottaClarice Julia GuerraJosé Nelson MuchaOBJECTIVE: To compare the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the simplified Q-sort method used to investigate the highest level of agreement among dentists, orthodontists and laypeople when assessing smile and dental attractiveness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An album containing 258 photos of 86 individuals with their lips at rest, a slight and broad smile, was assessed by 25 dentists (general clinicians and various specialties), 23 orthodontists and 27 laypeople with regard to smile and dental attractiveness. To this end, both VAS and simplified Q-sort method were used. Agreements were calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: For the single measurement between the VAS method and the simplified Q-sort method, all simplified Q-sort rates were higher in all groups. The simplified Q-sort method results ranged between 0.42 and 0.49 while those of the VAS method varied between 0.37 and 0.42. The simplified Q-sort method also presented higher mean measurement values (0.95 and 0.96) in comparison to VAS (0.94 and 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Both scales may be considered reliable for evaluating smile and dental attractiveness; however, the simplified Q-Sort method presented slightly higher values than the VAS method.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512015000200042&lng=en&tlng=enEstética dentáriaSorrisoQ-sortOrtodontia CorretivaEscala Visual Analógica
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pedro Lima Emmerich Oliveira
Andrea Fonseca Jardim da Motta
Clarice Julia Guerra
José Nelson Mucha
spellingShingle Pedro Lima Emmerich Oliveira
Andrea Fonseca Jardim da Motta
Clarice Julia Guerra
José Nelson Mucha
Comparison of two scales for evaluation of smile and dental attractiveness
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Estética dentária
Sorriso
Q-sort
Ortodontia Corretiva
Escala Visual Analógica
author_facet Pedro Lima Emmerich Oliveira
Andrea Fonseca Jardim da Motta
Clarice Julia Guerra
José Nelson Mucha
author_sort Pedro Lima Emmerich Oliveira
title Comparison of two scales for evaluation of smile and dental attractiveness
title_short Comparison of two scales for evaluation of smile and dental attractiveness
title_full Comparison of two scales for evaluation of smile and dental attractiveness
title_fullStr Comparison of two scales for evaluation of smile and dental attractiveness
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two scales for evaluation of smile and dental attractiveness
title_sort comparison of two scales for evaluation of smile and dental attractiveness
publisher Dental Press Editora
series Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
issn 2177-6709
publishDate 2015-04-01
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the simplified Q-sort method used to investigate the highest level of agreement among dentists, orthodontists and laypeople when assessing smile and dental attractiveness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An album containing 258 photos of 86 individuals with their lips at rest, a slight and broad smile, was assessed by 25 dentists (general clinicians and various specialties), 23 orthodontists and 27 laypeople with regard to smile and dental attractiveness. To this end, both VAS and simplified Q-sort method were used. Agreements were calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: For the single measurement between the VAS method and the simplified Q-sort method, all simplified Q-sort rates were higher in all groups. The simplified Q-sort method results ranged between 0.42 and 0.49 while those of the VAS method varied between 0.37 and 0.42. The simplified Q-sort method also presented higher mean measurement values (0.95 and 0.96) in comparison to VAS (0.94 and 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Both scales may be considered reliable for evaluating smile and dental attractiveness; however, the simplified Q-Sort method presented slightly higher values than the VAS method.
topic Estética dentária
Sorriso
Q-sort
Ortodontia Corretiva
Escala Visual Analógica
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512015000200042&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT pedrolimaemmericholiveira comparisonoftwoscalesforevaluationofsmileanddentalattractiveness
AT andreafonsecajardimdamotta comparisonoftwoscalesforevaluationofsmileanddentalattractiveness
AT claricejuliaguerra comparisonoftwoscalesforevaluationofsmileanddentalattractiveness
AT josenelsonmucha comparisonoftwoscalesforevaluationofsmileanddentalattractiveness
_version_ 1725119503608578048