Exploring some of the complexities of planning on ‘communal land’ in the former Transkei
‘The land question’ in South African national politics continues to dominate partypolitical battles. However, most of these battles refrain from engaging with ‘communal’ landholdings that are under the custodianship of traditional leaders. Of further concern, the legislation not only remains ambig...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of the Free State
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Town and Regional Planning |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/trp/article/view/4070 |
id |
doaj-7b6ddcb9589547f8806083f85930d8db |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7b6ddcb9589547f8806083f85930d8db2021-05-27T13:00:06ZengUniversity of the Free StateTown and Regional Planning1012-280X2415-04952019-12-01750616http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2415-0495/trp75i1.3Exploring some of the complexities of planning on ‘communal land’ in the former TranskeiTanja Winkler 0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0274-0497University of Cape Town, South Africa‘The land question’ in South African national politics continues to dominate partypolitical battles. However, most of these battles refrain from engaging with ‘communal’ landholdings that are under the custodianship of traditional leaders. Of further concern, the legislation not only remains ambiguous about traditional leaders’ land administration functions and powers, but it is also conceptualised within Western frameworks. Ambiguity and Western centricity, in turn, hinder planning efforts and municipal service delivery in South Africa’s rural regions, while residents continue to live without tenure security and enhanced socio-economic prospects. By focusing on ‘communal land’, this article revisits African indigenous land laws, in order to gain a deeper understanding of contemporary tenure practices on ‘communal’ landholdings. The article identifies some of the planning complexities found in former Transkei. Possible recommendations include following an area-based approach to planning where community property associations (or similar structures) are explored with residents of some ‘communal’ landholdings, while traditional leadership structures are explored in other contexts. All role players should thus have equal decision-making powers over local land administration and development. https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/trp/article/view/4070communal landtraditional leadersrural planningtenure insecurity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tanja Winkler |
spellingShingle |
Tanja Winkler Exploring some of the complexities of planning on ‘communal land’ in the former Transkei Town and Regional Planning communal land traditional leaders rural planning tenure insecurity |
author_facet |
Tanja Winkler |
author_sort |
Tanja Winkler |
title |
Exploring some of the complexities of planning on ‘communal land’ in the former Transkei |
title_short |
Exploring some of the complexities of planning on ‘communal land’ in the former Transkei |
title_full |
Exploring some of the complexities of planning on ‘communal land’ in the former Transkei |
title_fullStr |
Exploring some of the complexities of planning on ‘communal land’ in the former Transkei |
title_full_unstemmed |
Exploring some of the complexities of planning on ‘communal land’ in the former Transkei |
title_sort |
exploring some of the complexities of planning on ‘communal land’ in the former transkei |
publisher |
University of the Free State |
series |
Town and Regional Planning |
issn |
1012-280X 2415-0495 |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
‘The land question’ in South African national politics continues to dominate partypolitical battles. However, most of these battles refrain from engaging with ‘communal’ landholdings that are under the custodianship of traditional leaders. Of further concern, the legislation not only remains ambiguous about traditional leaders’ land administration functions and powers, but it is also conceptualised within Western frameworks. Ambiguity and Western centricity, in turn, hinder planning efforts and municipal service delivery in South Africa’s rural regions, while residents continue to live without tenure security and enhanced socio-economic prospects. By focusing on ‘communal land’, this article revisits African indigenous land laws, in order to gain a deeper understanding of contemporary tenure practices on ‘communal’ landholdings. The article identifies some of the planning complexities found in former Transkei. Possible recommendations include following an area-based approach to planning where community property associations (or similar structures) are explored with residents of some ‘communal’ landholdings, while traditional leadership structures are explored in other contexts. All role players should thus have equal decision-making powers over local land administration and development. |
topic |
communal land traditional leaders rural planning tenure insecurity |
url |
https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/trp/article/view/4070 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tanjawinkler exploringsomeofthecomplexitiesofplanningoncommunallandintheformertranskei |
_version_ |
1721425555502399488 |