“A tract for the times”. As Reith lectures de 1960 por Edgar Wind

In the last months of 1960, the art historian and philosopher Edgar Wind delivered that year’s BBC Reith Lectures, which made him a well-known public intellectual. Under the title of Art and Anarchy, Wind criticized throughout six lectures several aspects of modern art, including its marginalizatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ianick Takaes
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2019-08-01
Series:Figura
Online Access:https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/figura/article/view/10009
id doaj-7b624c4a89a64478949c8165232290b6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7b624c4a89a64478949c8165232290b62021-06-22T16:11:55ZporUniversidade Estadual de CampinasFigura2317-46252019-08-015110.20396/figura.v5i1.10009“A tract for the times”. As Reith lectures de 1960 por Edgar WindIanick Takaes0Universidade Estadual de Campinas In the last months of 1960, the art historian and philosopher Edgar Wind delivered that year’s BBC Reith Lectures, which made him a well-known public intellectual. Under the title of Art and Anarchy, Wind criticized throughout six lectures several aspects of modern art, including its marginalization and formalism, the practice of connoisseurship and the scepticism towards knowledge, the effects of mechanization upon creativity and the artist seclusion from society. Wind’s critiques, even though the end result of a lifetime of historical research and philosophical speculation on the artistic phenomenon, were formulated in response to contemporary events (i.e., the European artistic system, Britain in special, in the late 1950s and early 1960s). According to Wind, Art and Anarchywas a tract for the times. This article describes the reasons why Wind was invited by the BBC to deliver the 1960’s Reith Lectures, examines the aims of his critique vis-à-vis the artistic developments of those years, and evaluate his position as a public intellectual questioning the assumption that a wide diffusion of art was intrinsically good for society. Our main hypothesis is that Wind, by choosing Art and Anarchyas the title of his lectures, was engaging directly, albeit in an ironical sense, with Matthew Arnold’s Culture and Anarchy. https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/figura/article/view/10009
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ianick Takaes
spellingShingle Ianick Takaes
“A tract for the times”. As Reith lectures de 1960 por Edgar Wind
Figura
author_facet Ianick Takaes
author_sort Ianick Takaes
title “A tract for the times”. As Reith lectures de 1960 por Edgar Wind
title_short “A tract for the times”. As Reith lectures de 1960 por Edgar Wind
title_full “A tract for the times”. As Reith lectures de 1960 por Edgar Wind
title_fullStr “A tract for the times”. As Reith lectures de 1960 por Edgar Wind
title_full_unstemmed “A tract for the times”. As Reith lectures de 1960 por Edgar Wind
title_sort “a tract for the times”. as reith lectures de 1960 por edgar wind
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
series Figura
issn 2317-4625
publishDate 2019-08-01
description In the last months of 1960, the art historian and philosopher Edgar Wind delivered that year’s BBC Reith Lectures, which made him a well-known public intellectual. Under the title of Art and Anarchy, Wind criticized throughout six lectures several aspects of modern art, including its marginalization and formalism, the practice of connoisseurship and the scepticism towards knowledge, the effects of mechanization upon creativity and the artist seclusion from society. Wind’s critiques, even though the end result of a lifetime of historical research and philosophical speculation on the artistic phenomenon, were formulated in response to contemporary events (i.e., the European artistic system, Britain in special, in the late 1950s and early 1960s). According to Wind, Art and Anarchywas a tract for the times. This article describes the reasons why Wind was invited by the BBC to deliver the 1960’s Reith Lectures, examines the aims of his critique vis-à-vis the artistic developments of those years, and evaluate his position as a public intellectual questioning the assumption that a wide diffusion of art was intrinsically good for society. Our main hypothesis is that Wind, by choosing Art and Anarchyas the title of his lectures, was engaging directly, albeit in an ironical sense, with Matthew Arnold’s Culture and Anarchy.
url https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/figura/article/view/10009
work_keys_str_mv AT ianicktakaes atractforthetimesasreithlecturesde1960poredgarwind
_version_ 1721363055460220928