Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different housing systems on behaviour and growth performance of fattening pigs. Forty Duroc × Meishan pigs aged 100 d were assigned into two housing systems: indoor deep litter (DL) housing (4 pens with 5 pigs/pen) and indoor pen with outdoor play...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Applied Animal Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1561372 |
id |
doaj-7b5f1ea1f82f484cab79d58e3498b508 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7b5f1ea1f82f484cab79d58e3498b5082020-11-25T02:53:11ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Applied Animal Research0971-21190974-18442019-01-01471414510.1080/09712119.2018.15613721561372Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigsShengjuan Wei0Yuguang Guo1Peishi Yan2College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural UniversityCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural UniversityCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural UniversityThe aim of this study was to compare the effects of different housing systems on behaviour and growth performance of fattening pigs. Forty Duroc × Meishan pigs aged 100 d were assigned into two housing systems: indoor deep litter (DL) housing (4 pens with 5 pigs/pen) and indoor pen with outdoor playground (PG; 4 pens with 5 pigs/pen). Pig behaviour, body weight, and feed intake were recorded and analysed. Results showed that DL pigs spent more time exploring (DL: 231.0 vs. PG: 178.0 s/h, P < .01), while PG pigs were more aggressive (PG: 6.6 vs. DL: 0.4 s/h, P < .01) and engaged in higher levels of abnormal behaviour (PG: 20.0 vs. DL: 3.2 s/h, P < .01), specifically stereotyped behaviour and mouth-holding/biting tail. No difference was observed for the final body weight and feed conversion efficiency. The results of this study suggest that the DL system improves pig welfare at aspects of exploratory behaviour and abnormal behaviour compared with the PG housing system under the conditions studied, providing a basis for the selection and design of optimum housing systems for pigs.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1561372behaviourpigsdeep litterwelfareperformance |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shengjuan Wei Yuguang Guo Peishi Yan |
spellingShingle |
Shengjuan Wei Yuguang Guo Peishi Yan Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs Journal of Applied Animal Research behaviour pigs deep litter welfare performance |
author_facet |
Shengjuan Wei Yuguang Guo Peishi Yan |
author_sort |
Shengjuan Wei |
title |
Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs |
title_short |
Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs |
title_full |
Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs |
title_sort |
comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Journal of Applied Animal Research |
issn |
0971-2119 0974-1844 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different housing systems on behaviour and growth performance of fattening pigs. Forty Duroc × Meishan pigs aged 100 d were assigned into two housing systems: indoor deep litter (DL) housing (4 pens with 5 pigs/pen) and indoor pen with outdoor playground (PG; 4 pens with 5 pigs/pen). Pig behaviour, body weight, and feed intake were recorded and analysed. Results showed that DL pigs spent more time exploring (DL: 231.0 vs. PG: 178.0 s/h, P < .01), while PG pigs were more aggressive (PG: 6.6 vs. DL: 0.4 s/h, P < .01) and engaged in higher levels of abnormal behaviour (PG: 20.0 vs. DL: 3.2 s/h, P < .01), specifically stereotyped behaviour and mouth-holding/biting tail. No difference was observed for the final body weight and feed conversion efficiency. The results of this study suggest that the DL system improves pig welfare at aspects of exploratory behaviour and abnormal behaviour compared with the PG housing system under the conditions studied, providing a basis for the selection and design of optimum housing systems for pigs. |
topic |
behaviour pigs deep litter welfare performance |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1561372 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shengjuanwei comparisonoftwohousingsystemsonbehaviourandperformanceoffatteningpigs AT yuguangguo comparisonoftwohousingsystemsonbehaviourandperformanceoffatteningpigs AT peishiyan comparisonoftwohousingsystemsonbehaviourandperformanceoffatteningpigs |
_version_ |
1724726230147661824 |