Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different housing systems on behaviour and growth performance of fattening pigs. Forty Duroc × Meishan pigs aged 100 d were assigned into two housing systems: indoor deep litter (DL) housing (4 pens with 5 pigs/pen) and indoor pen with outdoor play...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shengjuan Wei, Yuguang Guo, Peishi Yan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Applied Animal Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1561372
id doaj-7b5f1ea1f82f484cab79d58e3498b508
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7b5f1ea1f82f484cab79d58e3498b5082020-11-25T02:53:11ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Applied Animal Research0971-21190974-18442019-01-01471414510.1080/09712119.2018.15613721561372Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigsShengjuan Wei0Yuguang Guo1Peishi Yan2College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural UniversityCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural UniversityCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural UniversityThe aim of this study was to compare the effects of different housing systems on behaviour and growth performance of fattening pigs. Forty Duroc × Meishan pigs aged 100 d were assigned into two housing systems: indoor deep litter (DL) housing (4 pens with 5 pigs/pen) and indoor pen with outdoor playground (PG; 4 pens with 5 pigs/pen). Pig behaviour, body weight, and feed intake were recorded and analysed. Results showed that DL pigs spent more time exploring (DL: 231.0 vs. PG: 178.0 s/h, P < .01), while PG pigs were more aggressive (PG: 6.6 vs. DL: 0.4 s/h, P < .01) and engaged in higher levels of abnormal behaviour (PG: 20.0 vs. DL: 3.2 s/h, P < .01), specifically stereotyped behaviour and mouth-holding/biting tail. No difference was observed for the final body weight and feed conversion efficiency. The results of this study suggest that the DL system improves pig welfare at aspects of exploratory behaviour and abnormal behaviour compared with the PG housing system under the conditions studied, providing a basis for the selection and design of optimum housing systems for pigs.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1561372behaviourpigsdeep litterwelfareperformance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shengjuan Wei
Yuguang Guo
Peishi Yan
spellingShingle Shengjuan Wei
Yuguang Guo
Peishi Yan
Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs
Journal of Applied Animal Research
behaviour
pigs
deep litter
welfare
performance
author_facet Shengjuan Wei
Yuguang Guo
Peishi Yan
author_sort Shengjuan Wei
title Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs
title_short Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs
title_full Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs
title_fullStr Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs
title_sort comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Journal of Applied Animal Research
issn 0971-2119
0974-1844
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different housing systems on behaviour and growth performance of fattening pigs. Forty Duroc × Meishan pigs aged 100 d were assigned into two housing systems: indoor deep litter (DL) housing (4 pens with 5 pigs/pen) and indoor pen with outdoor playground (PG; 4 pens with 5 pigs/pen). Pig behaviour, body weight, and feed intake were recorded and analysed. Results showed that DL pigs spent more time exploring (DL: 231.0 vs. PG: 178.0 s/h, P < .01), while PG pigs were more aggressive (PG: 6.6 vs. DL: 0.4 s/h, P < .01) and engaged in higher levels of abnormal behaviour (PG: 20.0 vs. DL: 3.2 s/h, P < .01), specifically stereotyped behaviour and mouth-holding/biting tail. No difference was observed for the final body weight and feed conversion efficiency. The results of this study suggest that the DL system improves pig welfare at aspects of exploratory behaviour and abnormal behaviour compared with the PG housing system under the conditions studied, providing a basis for the selection and design of optimum housing systems for pigs.
topic behaviour
pigs
deep litter
welfare
performance
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1561372
work_keys_str_mv AT shengjuanwei comparisonoftwohousingsystemsonbehaviourandperformanceoffatteningpigs
AT yuguangguo comparisonoftwohousingsystemsonbehaviourandperformanceoffatteningpigs
AT peishiyan comparisonoftwohousingsystemsonbehaviourandperformanceoffatteningpigs
_version_ 1724726230147661824