Randomness vs. fuzziness in managerial decision-making

Managers often deal with uncertainty of a different nature in their decision processes. They can encounter uncertainty in terms of randomness or fuzziness (i.e., mist, obscurity, inaccuracy or vagueness). In the first case (randomness), it can be described, for example, by probability distribution,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hašková Simona
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:SHS Web of Conferences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/02/shsconf_ies2018_01002.pdf
id doaj-7b5055deb8234785bc9951499697f969
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7b5055deb8234785bc9951499697f9692021-03-02T09:25:09ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242019-01-01610100210.1051/shsconf/20196101002shsconf_ies2018_01002Randomness vs. fuzziness in managerial decision-makingHašková SimonaManagers often deal with uncertainty of a different nature in their decision processes. They can encounter uncertainty in terms of randomness or fuzziness (i.e., mist, obscurity, inaccuracy or vagueness). In the first case (randomness), it can be described, for example, by probability distribution, in the second case (fuzziness) it cannot be characterized in such a way. The methodological part of the paper presents basic tools for dealing with the uncertainty of both of these types, which are techniques of probability theory and fuzzy approach technique. The original contribution of the theoretical part is the interpretation of these different techniques based on the existence of fundamental analogies between them. These techniques are then applied to the problem of the project valuation with its “internal” value. In the first case, the solution is the point value of the statistical E[PV], in the second case the triangular fuzzy number of the subjective E[PV]. The comparison of the results of both techniques shows that the fuzzy approach extends the standard outcome of a series useful information. This informative “superstructure” of the fuzzy approach compared to the standard solution is another original benefit of the paper.https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/02/shsconf_ies2018_01002.pdfUncertaintyProbabilityFuzzinessExpected valueFuzzy number
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hašková Simona
spellingShingle Hašková Simona
Randomness vs. fuzziness in managerial decision-making
SHS Web of Conferences
Uncertainty
Probability
Fuzziness
Expected value
Fuzzy number
author_facet Hašková Simona
author_sort Hašková Simona
title Randomness vs. fuzziness in managerial decision-making
title_short Randomness vs. fuzziness in managerial decision-making
title_full Randomness vs. fuzziness in managerial decision-making
title_fullStr Randomness vs. fuzziness in managerial decision-making
title_full_unstemmed Randomness vs. fuzziness in managerial decision-making
title_sort randomness vs. fuzziness in managerial decision-making
publisher EDP Sciences
series SHS Web of Conferences
issn 2261-2424
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Managers often deal with uncertainty of a different nature in their decision processes. They can encounter uncertainty in terms of randomness or fuzziness (i.e., mist, obscurity, inaccuracy or vagueness). In the first case (randomness), it can be described, for example, by probability distribution, in the second case (fuzziness) it cannot be characterized in such a way. The methodological part of the paper presents basic tools for dealing with the uncertainty of both of these types, which are techniques of probability theory and fuzzy approach technique. The original contribution of the theoretical part is the interpretation of these different techniques based on the existence of fundamental analogies between them. These techniques are then applied to the problem of the project valuation with its “internal” value. In the first case, the solution is the point value of the statistical E[PV], in the second case the triangular fuzzy number of the subjective E[PV]. The comparison of the results of both techniques shows that the fuzzy approach extends the standard outcome of a series useful information. This informative “superstructure” of the fuzzy approach compared to the standard solution is another original benefit of the paper.
topic Uncertainty
Probability
Fuzziness
Expected value
Fuzzy number
url https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/02/shsconf_ies2018_01002.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT haskovasimona randomnessvsfuzzinessinmanagerialdecisionmaking
_version_ 1724239526091554816