Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test

Individual differences in understanding other people’s emotions have typically been studied with recognition tests using prototypical emotional expressions. These tests have been criticized for the use of posed, prototypical displays, raising the question of whether such tests tell us anything about...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacob Israelashvili, Lisanne S. Pauw, Disa A. Sauter, Agneta H. Fischer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Journal of Intelligence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/9/2/25
id doaj-7b39ea83794c4472ba542a59d69934e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7b39ea83794c4472ba542a59d69934e12021-05-31T23:23:04ZengMDPI AGJournal of Intelligence2079-32002021-05-019252510.3390/jintelligence9020025Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy TestJacob Israelashvili0Lisanne S. Pauw1Disa A. Sauter2Agneta H. Fischer3Psychology Department, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9190501, IsraelDepartment of Psychology, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, GermanyFaculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1001 NK Amsterdam, The NetherlandsFaculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1001 NK Amsterdam, The NetherlandsIndividual differences in understanding other people’s emotions have typically been studied with recognition tests using prototypical emotional expressions. These tests have been criticized for the use of posed, prototypical displays, raising the question of whether such tests tell us anything about the ability to understand spontaneous, non-prototypical emotional expressions. Here, we employ the Emotional Accuracy Test (EAT), which uses natural emotional expressions and defines the recognition as the match between the emotion ratings of a target and a perceiver. In two preregistered studies (N<sub>total</sub> = 231), we compared the performance on the EAT with two well-established tests of emotion recognition ability: the Geneva Emotion Recognition Test (GERT) and the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET). We found significant overlap (<i>r</i> > 0.20) between individuals’ performance in recognizing spontaneous emotions in naturalistic settings (EAT) and posed (or enacted) non-verbal measures of emotion recognition (GERT, RMET), even when controlling for individual differences in verbal IQ. On average, however, participants reported enjoying the EAT more than the other tasks. Thus, the current research provides a proof-of-concept validation of the EAT as a useful measure for testing the understanding of others’ emotions, a crucial feature of emotional intelligence. Further, our findings indicate that emotion recognition tests using prototypical expressions are valid proxies for measuring the understanding of others’ emotions in more realistic everyday contexts.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/9/2/25emotion recognitionemotional accuracyempathyindividual differences
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jacob Israelashvili
Lisanne S. Pauw
Disa A. Sauter
Agneta H. Fischer
spellingShingle Jacob Israelashvili
Lisanne S. Pauw
Disa A. Sauter
Agneta H. Fischer
Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test
Journal of Intelligence
emotion recognition
emotional accuracy
empathy
individual differences
author_facet Jacob Israelashvili
Lisanne S. Pauw
Disa A. Sauter
Agneta H. Fischer
author_sort Jacob Israelashvili
title Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test
title_short Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test
title_full Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test
title_fullStr Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test
title_full_unstemmed Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test
title_sort emotion recognition from realistic dynamic emotional expressions cohere with established emotion recognition tests: a proof-of-concept validation of the emotional accuracy test
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Intelligence
issn 2079-3200
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Individual differences in understanding other people’s emotions have typically been studied with recognition tests using prototypical emotional expressions. These tests have been criticized for the use of posed, prototypical displays, raising the question of whether such tests tell us anything about the ability to understand spontaneous, non-prototypical emotional expressions. Here, we employ the Emotional Accuracy Test (EAT), which uses natural emotional expressions and defines the recognition as the match between the emotion ratings of a target and a perceiver. In two preregistered studies (N<sub>total</sub> = 231), we compared the performance on the EAT with two well-established tests of emotion recognition ability: the Geneva Emotion Recognition Test (GERT) and the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET). We found significant overlap (<i>r</i> > 0.20) between individuals’ performance in recognizing spontaneous emotions in naturalistic settings (EAT) and posed (or enacted) non-verbal measures of emotion recognition (GERT, RMET), even when controlling for individual differences in verbal IQ. On average, however, participants reported enjoying the EAT more than the other tasks. Thus, the current research provides a proof-of-concept validation of the EAT as a useful measure for testing the understanding of others’ emotions, a crucial feature of emotional intelligence. Further, our findings indicate that emotion recognition tests using prototypical expressions are valid proxies for measuring the understanding of others’ emotions in more realistic everyday contexts.
topic emotion recognition
emotional accuracy
empathy
individual differences
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/9/2/25
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobisraelashvili emotionrecognitionfromrealisticdynamicemotionalexpressionscoherewithestablishedemotionrecognitiontestsaproofofconceptvalidationoftheemotionalaccuracytest
AT lisannespauw emotionrecognitionfromrealisticdynamicemotionalexpressionscoherewithestablishedemotionrecognitiontestsaproofofconceptvalidationoftheemotionalaccuracytest
AT disaasauter emotionrecognitionfromrealisticdynamicemotionalexpressionscoherewithestablishedemotionrecognitiontestsaproofofconceptvalidationoftheemotionalaccuracytest
AT agnetahfischer emotionrecognitionfromrealisticdynamicemotionalexpressionscoherewithestablishedemotionrecognitiontestsaproofofconceptvalidationoftheemotionalaccuracytest
_version_ 1721417627405910016