Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test
Individual differences in understanding other people’s emotions have typically been studied with recognition tests using prototypical emotional expressions. These tests have been criticized for the use of posed, prototypical displays, raising the question of whether such tests tell us anything about...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Journal of Intelligence |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/9/2/25 |
id |
doaj-7b39ea83794c4472ba542a59d69934e1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7b39ea83794c4472ba542a59d69934e12021-05-31T23:23:04ZengMDPI AGJournal of Intelligence2079-32002021-05-019252510.3390/jintelligence9020025Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy TestJacob Israelashvili0Lisanne S. Pauw1Disa A. Sauter2Agneta H. Fischer3Psychology Department, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9190501, IsraelDepartment of Psychology, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, GermanyFaculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1001 NK Amsterdam, The NetherlandsFaculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1001 NK Amsterdam, The NetherlandsIndividual differences in understanding other people’s emotions have typically been studied with recognition tests using prototypical emotional expressions. These tests have been criticized for the use of posed, prototypical displays, raising the question of whether such tests tell us anything about the ability to understand spontaneous, non-prototypical emotional expressions. Here, we employ the Emotional Accuracy Test (EAT), which uses natural emotional expressions and defines the recognition as the match between the emotion ratings of a target and a perceiver. In two preregistered studies (N<sub>total</sub> = 231), we compared the performance on the EAT with two well-established tests of emotion recognition ability: the Geneva Emotion Recognition Test (GERT) and the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET). We found significant overlap (<i>r</i> > 0.20) between individuals’ performance in recognizing spontaneous emotions in naturalistic settings (EAT) and posed (or enacted) non-verbal measures of emotion recognition (GERT, RMET), even when controlling for individual differences in verbal IQ. On average, however, participants reported enjoying the EAT more than the other tasks. Thus, the current research provides a proof-of-concept validation of the EAT as a useful measure for testing the understanding of others’ emotions, a crucial feature of emotional intelligence. Further, our findings indicate that emotion recognition tests using prototypical expressions are valid proxies for measuring the understanding of others’ emotions in more realistic everyday contexts.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/9/2/25emotion recognitionemotional accuracyempathyindividual differences |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jacob Israelashvili Lisanne S. Pauw Disa A. Sauter Agneta H. Fischer |
spellingShingle |
Jacob Israelashvili Lisanne S. Pauw Disa A. Sauter Agneta H. Fischer Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test Journal of Intelligence emotion recognition emotional accuracy empathy individual differences |
author_facet |
Jacob Israelashvili Lisanne S. Pauw Disa A. Sauter Agneta H. Fischer |
author_sort |
Jacob Israelashvili |
title |
Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test |
title_short |
Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test |
title_full |
Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test |
title_fullStr |
Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test |
title_full_unstemmed |
Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test |
title_sort |
emotion recognition from realistic dynamic emotional expressions cohere with established emotion recognition tests: a proof-of-concept validation of the emotional accuracy test |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Journal of Intelligence |
issn |
2079-3200 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
Individual differences in understanding other people’s emotions have typically been studied with recognition tests using prototypical emotional expressions. These tests have been criticized for the use of posed, prototypical displays, raising the question of whether such tests tell us anything about the ability to understand spontaneous, non-prototypical emotional expressions. Here, we employ the Emotional Accuracy Test (EAT), which uses natural emotional expressions and defines the recognition as the match between the emotion ratings of a target and a perceiver. In two preregistered studies (N<sub>total</sub> = 231), we compared the performance on the EAT with two well-established tests of emotion recognition ability: the Geneva Emotion Recognition Test (GERT) and the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET). We found significant overlap (<i>r</i> > 0.20) between individuals’ performance in recognizing spontaneous emotions in naturalistic settings (EAT) and posed (or enacted) non-verbal measures of emotion recognition (GERT, RMET), even when controlling for individual differences in verbal IQ. On average, however, participants reported enjoying the EAT more than the other tasks. Thus, the current research provides a proof-of-concept validation of the EAT as a useful measure for testing the understanding of others’ emotions, a crucial feature of emotional intelligence. Further, our findings indicate that emotion recognition tests using prototypical expressions are valid proxies for measuring the understanding of others’ emotions in more realistic everyday contexts. |
topic |
emotion recognition emotional accuracy empathy individual differences |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/9/2/25 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jacobisraelashvili emotionrecognitionfromrealisticdynamicemotionalexpressionscoherewithestablishedemotionrecognitiontestsaproofofconceptvalidationoftheemotionalaccuracytest AT lisannespauw emotionrecognitionfromrealisticdynamicemotionalexpressionscoherewithestablishedemotionrecognitiontestsaproofofconceptvalidationoftheemotionalaccuracytest AT disaasauter emotionrecognitionfromrealisticdynamicemotionalexpressionscoherewithestablishedemotionrecognitiontestsaproofofconceptvalidationoftheemotionalaccuracytest AT agnetahfischer emotionrecognitionfromrealisticdynamicemotionalexpressionscoherewithestablishedemotionrecognitiontestsaproofofconceptvalidationoftheemotionalaccuracytest |
_version_ |
1721417627405910016 |