Sprachliche Zweifelsfälle als linguistischer Gegenstand. Zur Einführung in ein vergessenes Thema der Sprachwissenschaft.

The term "sprachlicher Zweifelsfall" ('linguistic case of doubt') is not yet well established in the terminology of linguistics. The first part of the paper therefore outlines a definition of "sprachlicher Zweifelsfall" and a classification of various types. Basically,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wolf Peter Klein
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Bern Open Publishing 2003-09-01
Series:Linguistik Online
Online Access:https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/793
id doaj-7b37b93af5334ddfbd80c18edc758bb3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7b37b93af5334ddfbd80c18edc758bb32021-09-13T12:57:13ZdeuBern Open PublishingLinguistik Online1615-30142003-09-0116410.13092/lo.16.793Sprachliche Zweifelsfälle als linguistischer Gegenstand. Zur Einführung in ein vergessenes Thema der Sprachwissenschaft.Wolf Peter KleinThe term "sprachlicher Zweifelsfall" ('linguistic case of doubt') is not yet well established in the terminology of linguistics. The first part of the paper therefore outlines a definition of "sprachlicher Zweifelsfall" and a classification of various types. Basically, the definition takes up the fact that even fully competent speakers sometimes do not know definitely which variant to choose from two (or more) alternatives. Doubts like this evolve on all levels of language (phonetics, morphology, lexic, syntax, semantics). Considering the emergence of "Zweifelsfälle", it is argued that they arise mainly from the existence of written language and more or less standardized varieties of language. At least some of their features refer to the specific conceptual conditions of writing and reading. In the second part of the paper, the "Zweifelsfälle" are reconceived in so far as they have been treated in the newer history of German discourse on language, including both popular and philological discussion. Starting in 19th century thought, they became symbolic means of social distinction. In contrast, linguists tended to neglect the existence of "Zweifelsfälle" because they did not fit in well with their theories on language. The paper ends with several theses dealing with possible future research on the topic. https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/793
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wolf Peter Klein
spellingShingle Wolf Peter Klein
Sprachliche Zweifelsfälle als linguistischer Gegenstand. Zur Einführung in ein vergessenes Thema der Sprachwissenschaft.
Linguistik Online
author_facet Wolf Peter Klein
author_sort Wolf Peter Klein
title Sprachliche Zweifelsfälle als linguistischer Gegenstand. Zur Einführung in ein vergessenes Thema der Sprachwissenschaft.
title_short Sprachliche Zweifelsfälle als linguistischer Gegenstand. Zur Einführung in ein vergessenes Thema der Sprachwissenschaft.
title_full Sprachliche Zweifelsfälle als linguistischer Gegenstand. Zur Einführung in ein vergessenes Thema der Sprachwissenschaft.
title_fullStr Sprachliche Zweifelsfälle als linguistischer Gegenstand. Zur Einführung in ein vergessenes Thema der Sprachwissenschaft.
title_full_unstemmed Sprachliche Zweifelsfälle als linguistischer Gegenstand. Zur Einführung in ein vergessenes Thema der Sprachwissenschaft.
title_sort sprachliche zweifelsfälle als linguistischer gegenstand. zur einführung in ein vergessenes thema der sprachwissenschaft.
publisher Bern Open Publishing
series Linguistik Online
issn 1615-3014
publishDate 2003-09-01
description The term "sprachlicher Zweifelsfall" ('linguistic case of doubt') is not yet well established in the terminology of linguistics. The first part of the paper therefore outlines a definition of "sprachlicher Zweifelsfall" and a classification of various types. Basically, the definition takes up the fact that even fully competent speakers sometimes do not know definitely which variant to choose from two (or more) alternatives. Doubts like this evolve on all levels of language (phonetics, morphology, lexic, syntax, semantics). Considering the emergence of "Zweifelsfälle", it is argued that they arise mainly from the existence of written language and more or less standardized varieties of language. At least some of their features refer to the specific conceptual conditions of writing and reading. In the second part of the paper, the "Zweifelsfälle" are reconceived in so far as they have been treated in the newer history of German discourse on language, including both popular and philological discussion. Starting in 19th century thought, they became symbolic means of social distinction. In contrast, linguists tended to neglect the existence of "Zweifelsfälle" because they did not fit in well with their theories on language. The paper ends with several theses dealing with possible future research on the topic.
url https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/793
work_keys_str_mv AT wolfpeterklein sprachlichezweifelsfallealslinguistischergegenstandzureinfuhrungineinvergessenesthemadersprachwissenschaft
_version_ 1717380694176432128