Le frontiere europee della religious accommodation. Spunti di comparazione

SOMMARIO: 1. Introduzione - 2. La religious accommodation in Europa - 3. (segue) Gli sviluppi più recenti - 4. Il ruolo della giurisprudenza europea: primi segnali di apertura all’accomodamento religioso - 5. Il know-how statunitense e canadese: modelli giurisprudenziali a confronto e possibili int...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Greta Pavesi
Format: Article
Language:Italian
Published: Università degli Studi di Milano 2021-05-01
Series:Stato, Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale
Online Access:https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/statoechiese/article/view/15635
id doaj-7b2a4f09f8584af9a19043898bc8ddf3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7b2a4f09f8584af9a19043898bc8ddf32021-05-25T09:09:40ZitaUniversità degli Studi di MilanoStato, Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale1971-85432021-05-01Le frontiere europee della religious accommodation. Spunti di comparazioneGreta Pavesi SOMMARIO: 1. Introduzione - 2. La religious accommodation in Europa - 3. (segue) Gli sviluppi più recenti - 4. Il ruolo della giurisprudenza europea: primi segnali di apertura all’accomodamento religioso - 5. Il know-how statunitense e canadese: modelli giurisprudenziali a confronto e possibili interazioni - 6. La religious accommodation in Europa: una prospettiva de iure condendo. The European frontiers of religious accommodation. Starting points for comparison ABSTRACT: In the last years several scholars pointed out the desirability to extend the accommodation beyond disability. Currently, indeed, a duty of reasonable accommodation is exclusively provided in favour of people with disabilities (art. 5 dir. 2000/78/CE). Previous contributions, however, have stressed how the existing lack of a provision on religious accommodation can result not only in a low level of protection of religious freedom, but also in the rise of a hierarchy related to discrimination grounds in which religion and belief seem to be left at the bottom. Recently, also the European Courts (especially the ECtHR) have apparently open to the extension of the concept of reasonable accommodation, in line with the sensitivity of the Supreme Courts of USA and Canada, where the religious accommodation was first stated. Moving from the comparison between the American and Canadian jurisprudences and the European one, this paper argues about the transposability of the religious accommodation in Europe, in order to strengthen, even in the workplace, the protection of the freedom of religion. https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/statoechiese/article/view/15635
collection DOAJ
language Italian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Greta Pavesi
spellingShingle Greta Pavesi
Le frontiere europee della religious accommodation. Spunti di comparazione
Stato, Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale
author_facet Greta Pavesi
author_sort Greta Pavesi
title Le frontiere europee della religious accommodation. Spunti di comparazione
title_short Le frontiere europee della religious accommodation. Spunti di comparazione
title_full Le frontiere europee della religious accommodation. Spunti di comparazione
title_fullStr Le frontiere europee della religious accommodation. Spunti di comparazione
title_full_unstemmed Le frontiere europee della religious accommodation. Spunti di comparazione
title_sort le frontiere europee della religious accommodation. spunti di comparazione
publisher Università degli Studi di Milano
series Stato, Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale
issn 1971-8543
publishDate 2021-05-01
description SOMMARIO: 1. Introduzione - 2. La religious accommodation in Europa - 3. (segue) Gli sviluppi più recenti - 4. Il ruolo della giurisprudenza europea: primi segnali di apertura all’accomodamento religioso - 5. Il know-how statunitense e canadese: modelli giurisprudenziali a confronto e possibili interazioni - 6. La religious accommodation in Europa: una prospettiva de iure condendo. The European frontiers of religious accommodation. Starting points for comparison ABSTRACT: In the last years several scholars pointed out the desirability to extend the accommodation beyond disability. Currently, indeed, a duty of reasonable accommodation is exclusively provided in favour of people with disabilities (art. 5 dir. 2000/78/CE). Previous contributions, however, have stressed how the existing lack of a provision on religious accommodation can result not only in a low level of protection of religious freedom, but also in the rise of a hierarchy related to discrimination grounds in which religion and belief seem to be left at the bottom. Recently, also the European Courts (especially the ECtHR) have apparently open to the extension of the concept of reasonable accommodation, in line with the sensitivity of the Supreme Courts of USA and Canada, where the religious accommodation was first stated. Moving from the comparison between the American and Canadian jurisprudences and the European one, this paper argues about the transposability of the religious accommodation in Europe, in order to strengthen, even in the workplace, the protection of the freedom of religion.
url https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/statoechiese/article/view/15635
work_keys_str_mv AT gretapavesi lefrontiereeuropeedellareligiousaccommodationspuntidicomparazione
_version_ 1721427761413750784