Support for the initial attachment, growth and differentiation of MG-63 cells: a comparison between nano-size hydroxyapatite and micro-size hydroxyapatite in composites

Elena Filová,1 Tomáš Suchý,2,3 Zbynek Sucharda,2 Monika Šupová,2 Margit Žaloudková,2 Karel Balík,2 Vera Lisá,1 Miroslav Šlouf,4 Lucie Bacáková11Department of Biomateri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Filová E, Suchý T, Sucharda Z, Šupová M, Žaloudková M, Balík K, Lisá V, Šlouf M, Bačáková L
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2014-08-01
Series:International Journal of Nanomedicine
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/support-for-the-initial-attachment-growth-and-differentiation-of-mg-63-peer-reviewed-article-IJN
id doaj-7b2784f6f8d941c1b0199cb1230f1297
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7b2784f6f8d941c1b0199cb1230f12972020-11-25T00:53:13ZengDove Medical PressInternational Journal of Nanomedicine1178-20132014-08-012014Issue 13687370617857Support for the initial attachment, growth and differentiation of MG-63 cells: a comparison between nano-size hydroxyapatite and micro-size hydroxyapatite in compositesFilová ESuchý TSucharda ZŠupová MŽaloudková MBalík KLisá VŠlouf MBačáková L Elena Filová,1 Tomáš Suchý,2,3 Zbynek Sucharda,2 Monika Šupová,2 Margit Žaloudková,2 Karel Balík,2 Vera Lisá,1 Miroslav Šlouf,4 Lucie Bacáková11Department of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Institute of Physiology, 2Department of Composite and Carbon Materials, Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 3Laboratory of Biomechanics, Department of Mechanics, Biomechanics and Mechatronics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, CTU in Prague, 4Department of Morphology and Rheology of Polymer Materials, Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech RepublicAbstract: Hydroxyapatite (HA) is considered to be a bioactive material that favorably influences the adhesion, growth, and osteogenic differentiation of osteoblasts. To optimize the cell response on the hydroxyapatite composite, it is desirable to assess the optimum concentration and also the optimum particle size. The aim of our study was to prepare composite materials made of polydimethylsiloxane, polyamide, and nano-sized (N) or micro-sized (M) HA, with an HA content of 0%, 2%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% (v/v) (referred to as N0–N25 or M0–M25), and to evaluate them in vitro in cultures with human osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. For clinical applications, fast osseointegration of the implant into the bone is essential. We observed the greatest initial cell adhesion on composites M10 and N5. Nano-sized HA supported cell growth, especially during the first 3 days of culture. On composites with micro-size HA (2%–15%), MG-63 cells reached the highest densities on day 7. Samples M20 and M25, however, were toxic for MG-63 cells, although these composites supported the production of osteocalcin in these cells. On N2, a higher concentration of osteopontin was found in MG-63 cells. For biomedical applications, the concentration range of 5%–15% (v/v) nano-size or micro-size HA seems to be optimum.Keywords: nanoparticles, hydroxyapatite, osteoblasts, composite materialshttp://www.dovepress.com/support-for-the-initial-attachment-growth-and-differentiation-of-mg-63-peer-reviewed-article-IJN
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Filová E
Suchý T
Sucharda Z
Šupová M
Žaloudková M
Balík K
Lisá V
Šlouf M
Bačáková L
spellingShingle Filová E
Suchý T
Sucharda Z
Šupová M
Žaloudková M
Balík K
Lisá V
Šlouf M
Bačáková L
Support for the initial attachment, growth and differentiation of MG-63 cells: a comparison between nano-size hydroxyapatite and micro-size hydroxyapatite in composites
International Journal of Nanomedicine
author_facet Filová E
Suchý T
Sucharda Z
Šupová M
Žaloudková M
Balík K
Lisá V
Šlouf M
Bačáková L
author_sort Filová E
title Support for the initial attachment, growth and differentiation of MG-63 cells: a comparison between nano-size hydroxyapatite and micro-size hydroxyapatite in composites
title_short Support for the initial attachment, growth and differentiation of MG-63 cells: a comparison between nano-size hydroxyapatite and micro-size hydroxyapatite in composites
title_full Support for the initial attachment, growth and differentiation of MG-63 cells: a comparison between nano-size hydroxyapatite and micro-size hydroxyapatite in composites
title_fullStr Support for the initial attachment, growth and differentiation of MG-63 cells: a comparison between nano-size hydroxyapatite and micro-size hydroxyapatite in composites
title_full_unstemmed Support for the initial attachment, growth and differentiation of MG-63 cells: a comparison between nano-size hydroxyapatite and micro-size hydroxyapatite in composites
title_sort support for the initial attachment, growth and differentiation of mg-63 cells: a comparison between nano-size hydroxyapatite and micro-size hydroxyapatite in composites
publisher Dove Medical Press
series International Journal of Nanomedicine
issn 1178-2013
publishDate 2014-08-01
description Elena Filová,1 Tomáš Suchý,2,3 Zbynek Sucharda,2 Monika Šupová,2 Margit Žaloudková,2 Karel Balík,2 Vera Lisá,1 Miroslav Šlouf,4 Lucie Bacáková11Department of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Institute of Physiology, 2Department of Composite and Carbon Materials, Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 3Laboratory of Biomechanics, Department of Mechanics, Biomechanics and Mechatronics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, CTU in Prague, 4Department of Morphology and Rheology of Polymer Materials, Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech RepublicAbstract: Hydroxyapatite (HA) is considered to be a bioactive material that favorably influences the adhesion, growth, and osteogenic differentiation of osteoblasts. To optimize the cell response on the hydroxyapatite composite, it is desirable to assess the optimum concentration and also the optimum particle size. The aim of our study was to prepare composite materials made of polydimethylsiloxane, polyamide, and nano-sized (N) or micro-sized (M) HA, with an HA content of 0%, 2%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% (v/v) (referred to as N0–N25 or M0–M25), and to evaluate them in vitro in cultures with human osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. For clinical applications, fast osseointegration of the implant into the bone is essential. We observed the greatest initial cell adhesion on composites M10 and N5. Nano-sized HA supported cell growth, especially during the first 3 days of culture. On composites with micro-size HA (2%–15%), MG-63 cells reached the highest densities on day 7. Samples M20 and M25, however, were toxic for MG-63 cells, although these composites supported the production of osteocalcin in these cells. On N2, a higher concentration of osteopontin was found in MG-63 cells. For biomedical applications, the concentration range of 5%–15% (v/v) nano-size or micro-size HA seems to be optimum.Keywords: nanoparticles, hydroxyapatite, osteoblasts, composite materials
url http://www.dovepress.com/support-for-the-initial-attachment-growth-and-differentiation-of-mg-63-peer-reviewed-article-IJN
work_keys_str_mv AT filovaacutee supportfortheinitialattachmentgrowthanddifferentiationofmg63cellsacomparisonbetweennanosizehydroxyapatiteandmicrosizehydroxyapatiteincomposites
AT suchyacutet supportfortheinitialattachmentgrowthanddifferentiationofmg63cellsacomparisonbetweennanosizehydroxyapatiteandmicrosizehydroxyapatiteincomposites
AT suchardaz supportfortheinitialattachmentgrowthanddifferentiationofmg63cellsacomparisonbetweennanosizehydroxyapatiteandmicrosizehydroxyapatiteincomposites
AT scaronupovaacutem supportfortheinitialattachmentgrowthanddifferentiationofmg63cellsacomparisonbetweennanosizehydroxyapatiteandmicrosizehydroxyapatiteincomposites
AT zaloudkovaacutem supportfortheinitialattachmentgrowthanddifferentiationofmg63cellsacomparisonbetweennanosizehydroxyapatiteandmicrosizehydroxyapatiteincomposites
AT baliacutekk supportfortheinitialattachmentgrowthanddifferentiationofmg63cellsacomparisonbetweennanosizehydroxyapatiteandmicrosizehydroxyapatiteincomposites
AT lisaacutev supportfortheinitialattachmentgrowthanddifferentiationofmg63cellsacomparisonbetweennanosizehydroxyapatiteandmicrosizehydroxyapatiteincomposites
AT scaronloufm supportfortheinitialattachmentgrowthanddifferentiationofmg63cellsacomparisonbetweennanosizehydroxyapatiteandmicrosizehydroxyapatiteincomposites
AT bacaacutekovaacutel supportfortheinitialattachmentgrowthanddifferentiationofmg63cellsacomparisonbetweennanosizehydroxyapatiteandmicrosizehydroxyapatiteincomposites
_version_ 1725238677017198592