Response time of respondents to separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire as a diagnostic marker of depressive disorders

The purpose of this work is to assess the informativeness of the response time of respondents to separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire as a diagnostic marker of depressive disorders. Material and methods. A total of 97 patients with depression (main group) were examined, the average age...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: K. I. Linska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Zaporozhye State Medical University 2020-08-01
Series:Zaporožskij Medicinskij Žurnal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://zmj.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/204950/206000
id doaj-7b0dba97eb994c4385a52c4ef99ac8f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7b0dba97eb994c4385a52c4ef99ac8f42020-11-25T02:50:47ZengZaporozhye State Medical UniversityZaporožskij Medicinskij Žurnal2306-41452310-12102020-08-0122340241010.14739/2310-1210.2020.3.204950Response time of respondents to separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire as a diagnostic marker of depressive disordersK. I. Linska0Psychiatry and Narcology of National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, KharkivThe purpose of this work is to assess the informativeness of the response time of respondents to separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire as a diagnostic marker of depressive disorders. Material and methods. A total of 97 patients with depression (main group) were examined, the average age was 40.94 ± 1.25 years (among them, 51 people with diagnosed depressive episode (F32 according to ICD-10) and 46 people with diagnosed recurrent depressive disorder (F33 according to ICD-10), as well as 64 practically healthy individuals with an average age of 41.21 ± 1.21 years (control group). We used clinical-psychopathological, psychometric (Derogatis questionnaire), as well as psychophysiological methods using Reocom-stress software and hardware complex (manufacturer KhAI-Medika,Kharkiv,Ukraine), with the function of recording the time for answering questions (response time). All the described methods were used twice during the study: with an interval of 17–19 days, at the beginning (examination No. 1) and at the end (examination No. 2) of the inpatient treatment course. Results. As a result of a comparative analysis of two information channels (traditional scores and response time to separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire), it was shown that the proportion of reaction time informativeness (in comparison with traditional scoring) increased in transition from survey No. 1 to survey No. 2 for markers of depressive disorders presence by 1.47 times (from 50.53 % to 74.29 %), and for markers of depressive disorders absence by 1.21 times (from 42.61 % to 51.76 %). Conclusions. It has been proven that the response time to the separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire regarding concomitant psychopathological symptoms are an informative tool for objective diagnosis of depression, as well as for monitoring the quality of therapy for patients with this pathology. http://zmj.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/204950/206000depressionconcomitant psychopathological symptomspatient outcome assessmentaudit testderogatis questionnairechronometryreaction time
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author K. I. Linska
spellingShingle K. I. Linska
Response time of respondents to separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire as a diagnostic marker of depressive disorders
Zaporožskij Medicinskij Žurnal
depression
concomitant psychopathological symptoms
patient outcome assessment
audit test
derogatis questionnaire
chronometry
reaction time
author_facet K. I. Linska
author_sort K. I. Linska
title Response time of respondents to separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire as a diagnostic marker of depressive disorders
title_short Response time of respondents to separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire as a diagnostic marker of depressive disorders
title_full Response time of respondents to separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire as a diagnostic marker of depressive disorders
title_fullStr Response time of respondents to separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire as a diagnostic marker of depressive disorders
title_full_unstemmed Response time of respondents to separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire as a diagnostic marker of depressive disorders
title_sort response time of respondents to separate points of the derogatis questionnaire as a diagnostic marker of depressive disorders
publisher Zaporozhye State Medical University
series Zaporožskij Medicinskij Žurnal
issn 2306-4145
2310-1210
publishDate 2020-08-01
description The purpose of this work is to assess the informativeness of the response time of respondents to separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire as a diagnostic marker of depressive disorders. Material and methods. A total of 97 patients with depression (main group) were examined, the average age was 40.94 ± 1.25 years (among them, 51 people with diagnosed depressive episode (F32 according to ICD-10) and 46 people with diagnosed recurrent depressive disorder (F33 according to ICD-10), as well as 64 practically healthy individuals with an average age of 41.21 ± 1.21 years (control group). We used clinical-psychopathological, psychometric (Derogatis questionnaire), as well as psychophysiological methods using Reocom-stress software and hardware complex (manufacturer KhAI-Medika,Kharkiv,Ukraine), with the function of recording the time for answering questions (response time). All the described methods were used twice during the study: with an interval of 17–19 days, at the beginning (examination No. 1) and at the end (examination No. 2) of the inpatient treatment course. Results. As a result of a comparative analysis of two information channels (traditional scores and response time to separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire), it was shown that the proportion of reaction time informativeness (in comparison with traditional scoring) increased in transition from survey No. 1 to survey No. 2 for markers of depressive disorders presence by 1.47 times (from 50.53 % to 74.29 %), and for markers of depressive disorders absence by 1.21 times (from 42.61 % to 51.76 %). Conclusions. It has been proven that the response time to the separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire regarding concomitant psychopathological symptoms are an informative tool for objective diagnosis of depression, as well as for monitoring the quality of therapy for patients with this pathology.
topic depression
concomitant psychopathological symptoms
patient outcome assessment
audit test
derogatis questionnaire
chronometry
reaction time
url http://zmj.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/204950/206000
work_keys_str_mv AT kilinska responsetimeofrespondentstoseparatepointsofthederogatisquestionnaireasadiagnosticmarkerofdepressivedisorders
_version_ 1724736422659751936