Why are computational neuroscience and systems biology so separate?
Despite similar computational approaches, there is surprisingly little interaction between the computational neuroscience and the systems biology research communities. In this review I reconstruct the history of the two disciplines and show that this may explain why they grew up apart. The separatio...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2008-05-01
|
Series: | PLoS Computational Biology |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2367448?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-7aeefed3bf1441e290dbe746fcd7fc1c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7aeefed3bf1441e290dbe746fcd7fc1c2020-11-24T21:50:44ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582008-05-0145e100007810.1371/journal.pcbi.1000078Why are computational neuroscience and systems biology so separate?Erik De SchutterDespite similar computational approaches, there is surprisingly little interaction between the computational neuroscience and the systems biology research communities. In this review I reconstruct the history of the two disciplines and show that this may explain why they grew up apart. The separation is a pity, as both fields can learn quite a bit from each other. Several examples are given, covering sociological, software technical, and methodological aspects. Systems biology is a better organized community which is very effective at sharing resources, while computational neuroscience has more experience in multiscale modeling and the analysis of information processing by biological systems. Finally, I speculate about how the relationship between the two fields may evolve in the near future.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2367448?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Erik De Schutter |
spellingShingle |
Erik De Schutter Why are computational neuroscience and systems biology so separate? PLoS Computational Biology |
author_facet |
Erik De Schutter |
author_sort |
Erik De Schutter |
title |
Why are computational neuroscience and systems biology so separate? |
title_short |
Why are computational neuroscience and systems biology so separate? |
title_full |
Why are computational neuroscience and systems biology so separate? |
title_fullStr |
Why are computational neuroscience and systems biology so separate? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why are computational neuroscience and systems biology so separate? |
title_sort |
why are computational neuroscience and systems biology so separate? |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS Computational Biology |
issn |
1553-734X 1553-7358 |
publishDate |
2008-05-01 |
description |
Despite similar computational approaches, there is surprisingly little interaction between the computational neuroscience and the systems biology research communities. In this review I reconstruct the history of the two disciplines and show that this may explain why they grew up apart. The separation is a pity, as both fields can learn quite a bit from each other. Several examples are given, covering sociological, software technical, and methodological aspects. Systems biology is a better organized community which is very effective at sharing resources, while computational neuroscience has more experience in multiscale modeling and the analysis of information processing by biological systems. Finally, I speculate about how the relationship between the two fields may evolve in the near future. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2367448?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT erikdeschutter whyarecomputationalneuroscienceandsystemsbiologysoseparate |
_version_ |
1725881893654626304 |