Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals
Agronomically important cereal crops wheat, barley, and rye of the Triticeace tribe under the genus Triticum were studied with special focus on their physical, proximal, and technological characteristics which are linked to their end product utilization. The physiochemical parameters showed variabil...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Nutrition |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2021.694679/full |
id |
doaj-7abb6c08733540278aa064a745db9a0e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7abb6c08733540278aa064a745db9a0e2021-09-16T04:46:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Nutrition2296-861X2021-09-01810.3389/fnut.2021.694679694679Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley CerealsMonika Rani0Gagandeep Singh1Raashid Ahmad Siddiqi2Balmeet Singh Gill3Dalbir Singh Sogi4Mohd Akbar Bhat5Department of Food Science and Technology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, IndiaDepartment of Chemistry, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, IndiaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, IndiaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, IndiaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, IndiaDean McGee Eye Institute Oklahoma University of Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United StatesAgronomically important cereal crops wheat, barley, and rye of the Triticeace tribe under the genus Triticum were studied with special focus on their physical, proximal, and technological characteristics which are linked to their end product utilization. The physiochemical parameters showed variability among the three cereal grains. Lactic acid-solvent retention capacity (SRC) was found to be higher in wheat (95.86–111.92%) as compared to rye (53.78–67.97%) and barley (50.24–67.12%) cultivars, indicating higher gluten strength. Sucrose-SRC and sodium carbonate-SRC were higher in rye as compared to wheat and barley flours. The essential amino acid proportion in barley and rye cultivars was higher as compared to wheat cultivars. Barley and rye flours exhibited higher biological value (BV) owing to their higher lysine content. SDS-PAGE of wheat cultivars showed a high degree of polymorphism in the low molecular range of 27.03–45.24 kDa as compared to barley and rye cultivars. High molecular weight (HMW) proteins varied from 68.38 to 119.66 kDa (4–5 subunits) in wheat, 82.33 to 117.78 kDa (4 subunits) in rye, and 73.08 to 108.57 kDa (2–4 subunits) in barley. The comparative evaluation of barley and rye with wheat cultivars would help in the development of healthy food products.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2021.694679/fullwheatryebarleysolvent retention capacitySDS-PAGEamino acids |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Monika Rani Gagandeep Singh Raashid Ahmad Siddiqi Balmeet Singh Gill Dalbir Singh Sogi Mohd Akbar Bhat |
spellingShingle |
Monika Rani Gagandeep Singh Raashid Ahmad Siddiqi Balmeet Singh Gill Dalbir Singh Sogi Mohd Akbar Bhat Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals Frontiers in Nutrition wheat rye barley solvent retention capacity SDS-PAGE amino acids |
author_facet |
Monika Rani Gagandeep Singh Raashid Ahmad Siddiqi Balmeet Singh Gill Dalbir Singh Sogi Mohd Akbar Bhat |
author_sort |
Monika Rani |
title |
Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals |
title_short |
Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals |
title_full |
Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals |
title_fullStr |
Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals |
title_sort |
comparative quality evaluation of physicochemical, technological, and protein profiling of wheat, rye, and barley cereals |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Nutrition |
issn |
2296-861X |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Agronomically important cereal crops wheat, barley, and rye of the Triticeace tribe under the genus Triticum were studied with special focus on their physical, proximal, and technological characteristics which are linked to their end product utilization. The physiochemical parameters showed variability among the three cereal grains. Lactic acid-solvent retention capacity (SRC) was found to be higher in wheat (95.86–111.92%) as compared to rye (53.78–67.97%) and barley (50.24–67.12%) cultivars, indicating higher gluten strength. Sucrose-SRC and sodium carbonate-SRC were higher in rye as compared to wheat and barley flours. The essential amino acid proportion in barley and rye cultivars was higher as compared to wheat cultivars. Barley and rye flours exhibited higher biological value (BV) owing to their higher lysine content. SDS-PAGE of wheat cultivars showed a high degree of polymorphism in the low molecular range of 27.03–45.24 kDa as compared to barley and rye cultivars. High molecular weight (HMW) proteins varied from 68.38 to 119.66 kDa (4–5 subunits) in wheat, 82.33 to 117.78 kDa (4 subunits) in rye, and 73.08 to 108.57 kDa (2–4 subunits) in barley. The comparative evaluation of barley and rye with wheat cultivars would help in the development of healthy food products. |
topic |
wheat rye barley solvent retention capacity SDS-PAGE amino acids |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2021.694679/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT monikarani comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals AT gagandeepsingh comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals AT raashidahmadsiddiqi comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals AT balmeetsinghgill comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals AT dalbirsinghsogi comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals AT mohdakbarbhat comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals |
_version_ |
1717378402916237312 |