Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals

Agronomically important cereal crops wheat, barley, and rye of the Triticeace tribe under the genus Triticum were studied with special focus on their physical, proximal, and technological characteristics which are linked to their end product utilization. The physiochemical parameters showed variabil...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Monika Rani, Gagandeep Singh, Raashid Ahmad Siddiqi, Balmeet Singh Gill, Dalbir Singh Sogi, Mohd Akbar Bhat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Nutrition
Subjects:
rye
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2021.694679/full
id doaj-7abb6c08733540278aa064a745db9a0e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7abb6c08733540278aa064a745db9a0e2021-09-16T04:46:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Nutrition2296-861X2021-09-01810.3389/fnut.2021.694679694679Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley CerealsMonika Rani0Gagandeep Singh1Raashid Ahmad Siddiqi2Balmeet Singh Gill3Dalbir Singh Sogi4Mohd Akbar Bhat5Department of Food Science and Technology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, IndiaDepartment of Chemistry, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, IndiaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, IndiaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, IndiaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, IndiaDean McGee Eye Institute Oklahoma University of Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United StatesAgronomically important cereal crops wheat, barley, and rye of the Triticeace tribe under the genus Triticum were studied with special focus on their physical, proximal, and technological characteristics which are linked to their end product utilization. The physiochemical parameters showed variability among the three cereal grains. Lactic acid-solvent retention capacity (SRC) was found to be higher in wheat (95.86–111.92%) as compared to rye (53.78–67.97%) and barley (50.24–67.12%) cultivars, indicating higher gluten strength. Sucrose-SRC and sodium carbonate-SRC were higher in rye as compared to wheat and barley flours. The essential amino acid proportion in barley and rye cultivars was higher as compared to wheat cultivars. Barley and rye flours exhibited higher biological value (BV) owing to their higher lysine content. SDS-PAGE of wheat cultivars showed a high degree of polymorphism in the low molecular range of 27.03–45.24 kDa as compared to barley and rye cultivars. High molecular weight (HMW) proteins varied from 68.38 to 119.66 kDa (4–5 subunits) in wheat, 82.33 to 117.78 kDa (4 subunits) in rye, and 73.08 to 108.57 kDa (2–4 subunits) in barley. The comparative evaluation of barley and rye with wheat cultivars would help in the development of healthy food products.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2021.694679/fullwheatryebarleysolvent retention capacitySDS-PAGEamino acids
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Monika Rani
Gagandeep Singh
Raashid Ahmad Siddiqi
Balmeet Singh Gill
Dalbir Singh Sogi
Mohd Akbar Bhat
spellingShingle Monika Rani
Gagandeep Singh
Raashid Ahmad Siddiqi
Balmeet Singh Gill
Dalbir Singh Sogi
Mohd Akbar Bhat
Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals
Frontiers in Nutrition
wheat
rye
barley
solvent retention capacity
SDS-PAGE
amino acids
author_facet Monika Rani
Gagandeep Singh
Raashid Ahmad Siddiqi
Balmeet Singh Gill
Dalbir Singh Sogi
Mohd Akbar Bhat
author_sort Monika Rani
title Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals
title_short Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals
title_full Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals
title_fullStr Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical, Technological, and Protein Profiling of Wheat, Rye, and Barley Cereals
title_sort comparative quality evaluation of physicochemical, technological, and protein profiling of wheat, rye, and barley cereals
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Nutrition
issn 2296-861X
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Agronomically important cereal crops wheat, barley, and rye of the Triticeace tribe under the genus Triticum were studied with special focus on their physical, proximal, and technological characteristics which are linked to their end product utilization. The physiochemical parameters showed variability among the three cereal grains. Lactic acid-solvent retention capacity (SRC) was found to be higher in wheat (95.86–111.92%) as compared to rye (53.78–67.97%) and barley (50.24–67.12%) cultivars, indicating higher gluten strength. Sucrose-SRC and sodium carbonate-SRC were higher in rye as compared to wheat and barley flours. The essential amino acid proportion in barley and rye cultivars was higher as compared to wheat cultivars. Barley and rye flours exhibited higher biological value (BV) owing to their higher lysine content. SDS-PAGE of wheat cultivars showed a high degree of polymorphism in the low molecular range of 27.03–45.24 kDa as compared to barley and rye cultivars. High molecular weight (HMW) proteins varied from 68.38 to 119.66 kDa (4–5 subunits) in wheat, 82.33 to 117.78 kDa (4 subunits) in rye, and 73.08 to 108.57 kDa (2–4 subunits) in barley. The comparative evaluation of barley and rye with wheat cultivars would help in the development of healthy food products.
topic wheat
rye
barley
solvent retention capacity
SDS-PAGE
amino acids
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2021.694679/full
work_keys_str_mv AT monikarani comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals
AT gagandeepsingh comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals
AT raashidahmadsiddiqi comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals
AT balmeetsinghgill comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals
AT dalbirsinghsogi comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals
AT mohdakbarbhat comparativequalityevaluationofphysicochemicaltechnologicalandproteinprofilingofwheatryeandbarleycereals
_version_ 1717378402916237312