Laborious but Elaborate: The Benefits of Really Studying Team Dynamics
In this manuscript we discuss the consequences of methodological choices when studying team processes “in the wild.” We chose teams in healthcare as the application because teamwork cannot only save lives but the processes constituting effective teamwork in healthcare are prototypical for teamwork a...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01478/full |
id |
doaj-7aa1bd1df1bc40cca1d3bb7ab90bb389 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7aa1bd1df1bc40cca1d3bb7ab90bb3892020-11-24T21:41:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-06-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.01478433269Laborious but Elaborate: The Benefits of Really Studying Team DynamicsMichaela Kolbe0Margarete Boos1Simulation Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandInstitute for Psychology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, GermanyIn this manuscript we discuss the consequences of methodological choices when studying team processes “in the wild.” We chose teams in healthcare as the application because teamwork cannot only save lives but the processes constituting effective teamwork in healthcare are prototypical for teamwork as they range from decision-making (e.g., in multidisciplinary decision-making boards in cancer care) to leadership and coordination (e.g., in fast-paced, acute-care settings in trauma, surgery and anesthesia) to reflection and learning (e.g., in post-event clinical debriefings). We draw upon recently emphasized critique that much empirical team research has focused on describing team states rather than investigating how team processes dynamically unfurl over time and how these dynamics predict team outcomes. This focus on statics instead of dynamics limits the gain of applicable knowledge on team functioning in organizations. We first describe three examples from healthcare that reflect the importance, scope, and challenges of teamwork: multidisciplinary decision-making boards, fast-paced, acute care settings, and post-event clinical team debriefings. Second, we put the methodological approaches of how teamwork in these representative examples has mostly been studied centerstage (i.e., using mainly surveys, database reviews, and rating tools) and highlight how the resulting findings provide only limited insights into the actual team processes and the quality thereof, leaving little room for identifying and targeting success factors. Third, we discuss how methodical approaches that take dynamics into account (i.e., event- and time-based behavior observation and micro-level coding, social sensor-based measurement) would contribute to the science of teams by providing actionable knowledge about interaction processes of successful teamwork.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01478/fullteam processteam dynamicsinteraction analysismethodsmeasurement |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michaela Kolbe Margarete Boos |
spellingShingle |
Michaela Kolbe Margarete Boos Laborious but Elaborate: The Benefits of Really Studying Team Dynamics Frontiers in Psychology team process team dynamics interaction analysis methods measurement |
author_facet |
Michaela Kolbe Margarete Boos |
author_sort |
Michaela Kolbe |
title |
Laborious but Elaborate: The Benefits of Really Studying Team Dynamics |
title_short |
Laborious but Elaborate: The Benefits of Really Studying Team Dynamics |
title_full |
Laborious but Elaborate: The Benefits of Really Studying Team Dynamics |
title_fullStr |
Laborious but Elaborate: The Benefits of Really Studying Team Dynamics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Laborious but Elaborate: The Benefits of Really Studying Team Dynamics |
title_sort |
laborious but elaborate: the benefits of really studying team dynamics |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2019-06-01 |
description |
In this manuscript we discuss the consequences of methodological choices when studying team processes “in the wild.” We chose teams in healthcare as the application because teamwork cannot only save lives but the processes constituting effective teamwork in healthcare are prototypical for teamwork as they range from decision-making (e.g., in multidisciplinary decision-making boards in cancer care) to leadership and coordination (e.g., in fast-paced, acute-care settings in trauma, surgery and anesthesia) to reflection and learning (e.g., in post-event clinical debriefings). We draw upon recently emphasized critique that much empirical team research has focused on describing team states rather than investigating how team processes dynamically unfurl over time and how these dynamics predict team outcomes. This focus on statics instead of dynamics limits the gain of applicable knowledge on team functioning in organizations. We first describe three examples from healthcare that reflect the importance, scope, and challenges of teamwork: multidisciplinary decision-making boards, fast-paced, acute care settings, and post-event clinical team debriefings. Second, we put the methodological approaches of how teamwork in these representative examples has mostly been studied centerstage (i.e., using mainly surveys, database reviews, and rating tools) and highlight how the resulting findings provide only limited insights into the actual team processes and the quality thereof, leaving little room for identifying and targeting success factors. Third, we discuss how methodical approaches that take dynamics into account (i.e., event- and time-based behavior observation and micro-level coding, social sensor-based measurement) would contribute to the science of teams by providing actionable knowledge about interaction processes of successful teamwork. |
topic |
team process team dynamics interaction analysis methods measurement |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01478/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michaelakolbe laboriousbutelaboratethebenefitsofreallystudyingteamdynamics AT margareteboos laboriousbutelaboratethebenefitsofreallystudyingteamdynamics |
_version_ |
1725923483190296576 |