Preemptive anti-cytomegalovirus therapy in high-risk (donor-positive, recipient-negative cytomegalovirus serostatus) kidney transplant recipients

Objectives: Universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy are used to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease post-transplantation. Data regarding which strategy is superior are sparse, especially in high-risk recipients (donor CMV seropositive (D+) and recipient CMV seronegative (Râ)). Methods: This r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jumpei Hasegawa, Shuji Hatakeyama, Sachiko Wakai, Kazuya Omoto, Masayoshi Okumi, Kazunari Tanabe, Makiko Mieno, Hiroki Shirakawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-12-01
Series:International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971217302485
id doaj-7a9292dcc1f644d4b4ff5156c81107b1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7a9292dcc1f644d4b4ff5156c81107b12020-11-24T21:04:10ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases1201-97122017-12-01655056Preemptive anti-cytomegalovirus therapy in high-risk (donor-positive, recipient-negative cytomegalovirus serostatus) kidney transplant recipientsJumpei Hasegawa0Shuji Hatakeyama1Sachiko Wakai2Kazuya Omoto3Masayoshi Okumi4Kazunari Tanabe5Makiko Mieno6Hiroki Shirakawa7Department of Nephrology, Tokyo Metropolitan Health and Medical Treatment Corporation Okubo Hospital, Kabukicho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Tokyo Womenâs Medical University, Kawadacho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JapanDivision of General Internal Medicine/Division of Infectious Diseases, Jichi Medical University Hospital, Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, Japan; Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Health and Medical Treatment Corporation Okubo Hospital, Kabukicho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan; Corresponding author at: Division of General Internal Medicine/Division of Infectious Diseases, Jichi Medical University Hospital, Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.Department of Nephrology, Tokyo Metropolitan Health and Medical Treatment Corporation Okubo Hospital, Kabukicho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Womenâs Medical University, Kawadacho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Womenâs Medical University, Kawadacho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Womenâs Medical University, Kawadacho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Medical Informatics, Center for Information, Jichi Medical University, Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, JapanDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Health and Medical Treatment Corporation Okubo Hospital, Kabukicho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JapanObjectives: Universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy are used to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease post-transplantation. Data regarding which strategy is superior are sparse, especially in high-risk recipients (donor CMV seropositive (D+) and recipient CMV seronegative (Râ)). Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included recipients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2009 and 2015. The incidence of CMV infection/disease and patient and graft outcomes were analyzed and compared between high-risk recipients (D+/Râ) and intermediate-risk recipients (D+/R+ or Dâ/R+), all managed with preemptive therapy. Results: Of 118 kidney transplant recipients, 21 were high-risk and 97 were intermediate-risk. Over a median follow-up period of 3 years, asymptomatic CMV infection developed significantly more frequently in high-risk patients than in intermediate-risk patients (38.1% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.04), and CMV disease developed in a similar manner (28.6% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.01). Among high-risk patients, CMV infection developed within the first 3 months post-transplantation and CMV disease within the first 9 months post-transplantation. KaplanâMeier analysis showed no difference in the probability of mortality (log-rank p = 0.63) or graft loss (log-rank p = 0.50) between the patient groups. Graft rejection occurred more frequently in high-risk than in intermediate-risk patients, but the difference was not significant (log-rank p = 0.24). Conclusions: These results suggest that further studies on universal prophylaxis in high-risk patients are needed to elucidate whether preventing CMV infection/disease during the early post-transplant period leads to better outcomes, especially in terms of reducing graft rejection. Keywords: Cytomegalovirus, Prophylaxis, Preemptive therapy, Kidney transplantation, Acute rejectionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971217302485
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jumpei Hasegawa
Shuji Hatakeyama
Sachiko Wakai
Kazuya Omoto
Masayoshi Okumi
Kazunari Tanabe
Makiko Mieno
Hiroki Shirakawa
spellingShingle Jumpei Hasegawa
Shuji Hatakeyama
Sachiko Wakai
Kazuya Omoto
Masayoshi Okumi
Kazunari Tanabe
Makiko Mieno
Hiroki Shirakawa
Preemptive anti-cytomegalovirus therapy in high-risk (donor-positive, recipient-negative cytomegalovirus serostatus) kidney transplant recipients
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
author_facet Jumpei Hasegawa
Shuji Hatakeyama
Sachiko Wakai
Kazuya Omoto
Masayoshi Okumi
Kazunari Tanabe
Makiko Mieno
Hiroki Shirakawa
author_sort Jumpei Hasegawa
title Preemptive anti-cytomegalovirus therapy in high-risk (donor-positive, recipient-negative cytomegalovirus serostatus) kidney transplant recipients
title_short Preemptive anti-cytomegalovirus therapy in high-risk (donor-positive, recipient-negative cytomegalovirus serostatus) kidney transplant recipients
title_full Preemptive anti-cytomegalovirus therapy in high-risk (donor-positive, recipient-negative cytomegalovirus serostatus) kidney transplant recipients
title_fullStr Preemptive anti-cytomegalovirus therapy in high-risk (donor-positive, recipient-negative cytomegalovirus serostatus) kidney transplant recipients
title_full_unstemmed Preemptive anti-cytomegalovirus therapy in high-risk (donor-positive, recipient-negative cytomegalovirus serostatus) kidney transplant recipients
title_sort preemptive anti-cytomegalovirus therapy in high-risk (donor-positive, recipient-negative cytomegalovirus serostatus) kidney transplant recipients
publisher Elsevier
series International Journal of Infectious Diseases
issn 1201-9712
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Objectives: Universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy are used to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease post-transplantation. Data regarding which strategy is superior are sparse, especially in high-risk recipients (donor CMV seropositive (D+) and recipient CMV seronegative (Râ)). Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included recipients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2009 and 2015. The incidence of CMV infection/disease and patient and graft outcomes were analyzed and compared between high-risk recipients (D+/Râ) and intermediate-risk recipients (D+/R+ or Dâ/R+), all managed with preemptive therapy. Results: Of 118 kidney transplant recipients, 21 were high-risk and 97 were intermediate-risk. Over a median follow-up period of 3 years, asymptomatic CMV infection developed significantly more frequently in high-risk patients than in intermediate-risk patients (38.1% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.04), and CMV disease developed in a similar manner (28.6% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.01). Among high-risk patients, CMV infection developed within the first 3 months post-transplantation and CMV disease within the first 9 months post-transplantation. KaplanâMeier analysis showed no difference in the probability of mortality (log-rank p = 0.63) or graft loss (log-rank p = 0.50) between the patient groups. Graft rejection occurred more frequently in high-risk than in intermediate-risk patients, but the difference was not significant (log-rank p = 0.24). Conclusions: These results suggest that further studies on universal prophylaxis in high-risk patients are needed to elucidate whether preventing CMV infection/disease during the early post-transplant period leads to better outcomes, especially in terms of reducing graft rejection. Keywords: Cytomegalovirus, Prophylaxis, Preemptive therapy, Kidney transplantation, Acute rejection
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971217302485
work_keys_str_mv AT jumpeihasegawa preemptiveanticytomegalovirustherapyinhighriskdonorpositiverecipientnegativecytomegalovirusserostatuskidneytransplantrecipients
AT shujihatakeyama preemptiveanticytomegalovirustherapyinhighriskdonorpositiverecipientnegativecytomegalovirusserostatuskidneytransplantrecipients
AT sachikowakai preemptiveanticytomegalovirustherapyinhighriskdonorpositiverecipientnegativecytomegalovirusserostatuskidneytransplantrecipients
AT kazuyaomoto preemptiveanticytomegalovirustherapyinhighriskdonorpositiverecipientnegativecytomegalovirusserostatuskidneytransplantrecipients
AT masayoshiokumi preemptiveanticytomegalovirustherapyinhighriskdonorpositiverecipientnegativecytomegalovirusserostatuskidneytransplantrecipients
AT kazunaritanabe preemptiveanticytomegalovirustherapyinhighriskdonorpositiverecipientnegativecytomegalovirusserostatuskidneytransplantrecipients
AT makikomieno preemptiveanticytomegalovirustherapyinhighriskdonorpositiverecipientnegativecytomegalovirusserostatuskidneytransplantrecipients
AT hirokishirakawa preemptiveanticytomegalovirustherapyinhighriskdonorpositiverecipientnegativecytomegalovirusserostatuskidneytransplantrecipients
_version_ 1716771783249494016