The surprising decline of international mediation in armed conflicts
We identify and investigate a fundamental puzzle in contemporary mediation of armed conflicts. Although the preparedness of international mediators has increased, the proportion of armed conflicts that receive mediation has not increased, but decreased. Using quantitative data on the occurrence of m...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Research & Politics |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020917243 |
id |
doaj-7a8c8ca83b9a4fc0ae746e2da7f28dc9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7a8c8ca83b9a4fc0ae746e2da7f28dc92020-11-25T03:20:49ZengSAGE PublishingResearch & Politics2053-16802020-05-01710.1177/2053168020917243The surprising decline of international mediation in armed conflictsMagnus Lundgren0Isak Svensson1Department of Political Science, Stockholm University, SwedenDepartment of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, SwedenWe identify and investigate a fundamental puzzle in contemporary mediation of armed conflicts. Although the preparedness of international mediators has increased, the proportion of armed conflicts that receive mediation has not increased, but decreased. Using quantitative data on the occurrence of mediation between 1989 and 2013, our analysis suggests that this puzzling contradiction cannot be explained by conflicts being more fragmented, intractable or internationalized. Instead, we argue that the puzzling decline of mediation can be explained by a mismatch between supply and demand in the international mediation ‘market’. Although there are more mediators available, the rise in the number of conflicts involving Islamist armed actors, coupled with increased reliance on terror-listing, especially since 2001, has placed a growing number of conflicts beyond the reach of international mediators. Our findings challenge the conventional belief that the post-Cold War era is characterized by high mediation rates and point to the need to develop the practice of mediation to maintain its relevance in the contemporary conflict landscape.https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020917243 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Magnus Lundgren Isak Svensson |
spellingShingle |
Magnus Lundgren Isak Svensson The surprising decline of international mediation in armed conflicts Research & Politics |
author_facet |
Magnus Lundgren Isak Svensson |
author_sort |
Magnus Lundgren |
title |
The surprising decline of international mediation in armed conflicts |
title_short |
The surprising decline of international mediation in armed conflicts |
title_full |
The surprising decline of international mediation in armed conflicts |
title_fullStr |
The surprising decline of international mediation in armed conflicts |
title_full_unstemmed |
The surprising decline of international mediation in armed conflicts |
title_sort |
surprising decline of international mediation in armed conflicts |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Research & Politics |
issn |
2053-1680 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
We identify and investigate a fundamental puzzle in contemporary mediation of armed conflicts. Although the preparedness of international mediators has increased, the proportion of armed conflicts that receive mediation has not increased, but decreased. Using quantitative data on the occurrence of mediation between 1989 and 2013, our analysis suggests that this puzzling contradiction cannot be explained by conflicts being more fragmented, intractable or internationalized. Instead, we argue that the puzzling decline of mediation can be explained by a mismatch between supply and demand in the international mediation ‘market’. Although there are more mediators available, the rise in the number of conflicts involving Islamist armed actors, coupled with increased reliance on terror-listing, especially since 2001, has placed a growing number of conflicts beyond the reach of international mediators. Our findings challenge the conventional belief that the post-Cold War era is characterized by high mediation rates and point to the need to develop the practice of mediation to maintain its relevance in the contemporary conflict landscape. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020917243 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT magnuslundgren thesurprisingdeclineofinternationalmediationinarmedconflicts AT isaksvensson thesurprisingdeclineofinternationalmediationinarmedconflicts AT magnuslundgren surprisingdeclineofinternationalmediationinarmedconflicts AT isaksvensson surprisingdeclineofinternationalmediationinarmedconflicts |
_version_ |
1724616464142434304 |