Using Action Research to Organize Technology Transfer in Complex Innovation Contexts
Technology transfer projects increasingly consist of multiple, diverse organizations, with each pursuing their own agenda as well as that of the overarching programme. In this article, we adopt a participatory action research methodology in order to explain and improve the coordination of the autono...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Carleton University
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Technology Innovation Management Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://timreview.ca/article/1230 |
id |
doaj-7a833c51a79846ac990a3ae86a0938d8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7a833c51a79846ac990a3ae86a0938d82020-11-25T02:11:46ZengCarleton UniversityTechnology Innovation Management Review1927-03212019-04-01941726http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1230Using Action Research to Organize Technology Transfer in Complex Innovation ContextsArmando Machevo Ussivane0Paul Ellwood1 RBL University of Liverpool Technology transfer projects increasingly consist of multiple, diverse organizations, with each pursuing their own agenda as well as that of the overarching programme. In this article, we adopt a participatory action research methodology in order to explain and improve the coordination of the autonomous innovation activities within an organizationally complex project. The context of the research involved the transfer of rice production technology from China to Mozambique. The action research identified four categories of boundary within the project that were hindering performance: Intellectual/Land property rights; Public/Private sector logics; Inside/Outside programme; and Collaboration/Competition between programme actors. The process of co-inquiry with stakeholders enabled by the action research allowed programme actors to reach an understanding of others, and it created a new thinking space for mutual problem solving. By these means, the action research process makes a resource of the differences between stakeholders rather than it being seen as a barrier to be compromised through negotiation.https://timreview.ca/article/1230action researchagricultural innovationboundariesinternational collaborationtechnology transfer |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Armando Machevo Ussivane Paul Ellwood |
spellingShingle |
Armando Machevo Ussivane Paul Ellwood Using Action Research to Organize Technology Transfer in Complex Innovation Contexts Technology Innovation Management Review action research agricultural innovation boundaries international collaboration technology transfer |
author_facet |
Armando Machevo Ussivane Paul Ellwood |
author_sort |
Armando Machevo Ussivane |
title |
Using Action Research to Organize Technology Transfer in Complex Innovation Contexts |
title_short |
Using Action Research to Organize Technology Transfer in Complex Innovation Contexts |
title_full |
Using Action Research to Organize Technology Transfer in Complex Innovation Contexts |
title_fullStr |
Using Action Research to Organize Technology Transfer in Complex Innovation Contexts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Using Action Research to Organize Technology Transfer in Complex Innovation Contexts |
title_sort |
using action research to organize technology transfer in complex innovation contexts |
publisher |
Carleton University |
series |
Technology Innovation Management Review |
issn |
1927-0321 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
Technology transfer projects increasingly consist of multiple, diverse organizations, with each pursuing their own agenda as well as that of the overarching programme. In this article, we adopt a participatory action research methodology in order to explain and improve the coordination of the autonomous innovation activities within an organizationally complex project. The context of the research involved the transfer of rice production technology from China to Mozambique. The action research identified four categories of boundary within the project that were hindering performance: Intellectual/Land property rights; Public/Private sector logics; Inside/Outside programme; and Collaboration/Competition between programme actors. The process of co-inquiry with stakeholders enabled by the action research allowed programme actors to reach an understanding of others, and it created a new thinking space for mutual problem solving. By these means, the action research process makes a resource of the differences between stakeholders rather than it being seen as a barrier to be compromised through negotiation. |
topic |
action research agricultural innovation boundaries international collaboration technology transfer |
url |
https://timreview.ca/article/1230 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT armandomachevoussivane usingactionresearchtoorganizetechnologytransferincomplexinnovationcontexts AT paulellwood usingactionresearchtoorganizetechnologytransferincomplexinnovationcontexts |
_version_ |
1724912738640068608 |