Speech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociology

Abstract Five years ago, a new three volume edition of Eugen Rosenstock- Huessy (to translate) In the Cross of Reality: A Post-Goethean Sociology appeared in Germany. As with the two prior editions of the work (a one volume version in 1925, and a much revised and expanded two volume version...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cristaudo Wayne
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade 2015-01-01
Series:Filozofija i Društvo
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2015/0353-57381501179C.pdf
id doaj-7a78117bc5e84b1189507f2ead6c60cf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7a78117bc5e84b1189507f2ead6c60cf2020-11-24T21:53:24ZdeuInstitute for Philosophy and Social Theory, BelgradeFilozofija i Društvo0353-57382334-85772015-01-0126117920410.2298/FID1501179C0353-57381501179CSpeech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociologyCristaudo Wayne0Charles Darwin University, School of Creative Arts and Humanities, AustraliaAbstract Five years ago, a new three volume edition of Eugen Rosenstock- Huessy (to translate) In the Cross of Reality: A Post-Goethean Sociology appeared in Germany. As with the two prior editions of the work (a one volume version in 1925, and a much revised and expanded two volume version 1956/8) it met with almost no critical response. This is perhaps not surprising - and it barely mentions any other sociologists, its approach is highly idiosyncratic, it is as much anthropology and history as it is sociology. Indeed, the second and third volumes mainly focus on the social formations of antiquity, and the role of Christianity and the messianic revolutions of the last millennium in creating a universal history. In this paper I take the relationship between speech, time and suffering as the key to Rosenstock-Huessy’s argument for why a theoretical grasp of Christianity as a social power is so important for social theory, and why he sees Sociology as a post-Christian form of knowledge. I also make the case for why Rosenstock-Huessy is an interesting and important social theorist.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2015/0353-57381501179C.pdfnamestribesempirescity-statesIsraelitesChristianityrevolutionspost-Christian
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cristaudo Wayne
spellingShingle Cristaudo Wayne
Speech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociology
Filozofija i Društvo
names
tribes
empires
city-states
Israelites
Christianity
revolutions
post-Christian
author_facet Cristaudo Wayne
author_sort Cristaudo Wayne
title Speech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociology
title_short Speech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociology
title_full Speech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociology
title_fullStr Speech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociology
title_full_unstemmed Speech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociology
title_sort speech, time and suffering: rosenstock-huessy’s post-goethean, post-christian sociology
publisher Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade
series Filozofija i Društvo
issn 0353-5738
2334-8577
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Abstract Five years ago, a new three volume edition of Eugen Rosenstock- Huessy (to translate) In the Cross of Reality: A Post-Goethean Sociology appeared in Germany. As with the two prior editions of the work (a one volume version in 1925, and a much revised and expanded two volume version 1956/8) it met with almost no critical response. This is perhaps not surprising - and it barely mentions any other sociologists, its approach is highly idiosyncratic, it is as much anthropology and history as it is sociology. Indeed, the second and third volumes mainly focus on the social formations of antiquity, and the role of Christianity and the messianic revolutions of the last millennium in creating a universal history. In this paper I take the relationship between speech, time and suffering as the key to Rosenstock-Huessy’s argument for why a theoretical grasp of Christianity as a social power is so important for social theory, and why he sees Sociology as a post-Christian form of knowledge. I also make the case for why Rosenstock-Huessy is an interesting and important social theorist.
topic names
tribes
empires
city-states
Israelites
Christianity
revolutions
post-Christian
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2015/0353-57381501179C.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT cristaudowayne speechtimeandsufferingrosenstockhuessyspostgoetheanpostchristiansociology
_version_ 1725872567802134528