Speech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociology
Abstract Five years ago, a new three volume edition of Eugen Rosenstock- Huessy (to translate) In the Cross of Reality: A Post-Goethean Sociology appeared in Germany. As with the two prior editions of the work (a one volume version in 1925, and a much revised and expanded two volume version...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Filozofija i Društvo |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2015/0353-57381501179C.pdf |
id |
doaj-7a78117bc5e84b1189507f2ead6c60cf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7a78117bc5e84b1189507f2ead6c60cf2020-11-24T21:53:24ZdeuInstitute for Philosophy and Social Theory, BelgradeFilozofija i Društvo0353-57382334-85772015-01-0126117920410.2298/FID1501179C0353-57381501179CSpeech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociologyCristaudo Wayne0Charles Darwin University, School of Creative Arts and Humanities, AustraliaAbstract Five years ago, a new three volume edition of Eugen Rosenstock- Huessy (to translate) In the Cross of Reality: A Post-Goethean Sociology appeared in Germany. As with the two prior editions of the work (a one volume version in 1925, and a much revised and expanded two volume version 1956/8) it met with almost no critical response. This is perhaps not surprising - and it barely mentions any other sociologists, its approach is highly idiosyncratic, it is as much anthropology and history as it is sociology. Indeed, the second and third volumes mainly focus on the social formations of antiquity, and the role of Christianity and the messianic revolutions of the last millennium in creating a universal history. In this paper I take the relationship between speech, time and suffering as the key to Rosenstock-Huessy’s argument for why a theoretical grasp of Christianity as a social power is so important for social theory, and why he sees Sociology as a post-Christian form of knowledge. I also make the case for why Rosenstock-Huessy is an interesting and important social theorist.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2015/0353-57381501179C.pdfnamestribesempirescity-statesIsraelitesChristianityrevolutionspost-Christian |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cristaudo Wayne |
spellingShingle |
Cristaudo Wayne Speech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociology Filozofija i Društvo names tribes empires city-states Israelites Christianity revolutions post-Christian |
author_facet |
Cristaudo Wayne |
author_sort |
Cristaudo Wayne |
title |
Speech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociology |
title_short |
Speech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociology |
title_full |
Speech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociology |
title_fullStr |
Speech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Speech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociology |
title_sort |
speech, time and suffering: rosenstock-huessy’s post-goethean, post-christian sociology |
publisher |
Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade |
series |
Filozofija i Društvo |
issn |
0353-5738 2334-8577 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Abstract Five years ago, a new three volume edition of Eugen Rosenstock-
Huessy (to translate) In the Cross of Reality: A Post-Goethean Sociology
appeared in Germany. As with the two prior editions of the work (a one volume
version in 1925, and a much revised and expanded two volume version 1956/8)
it met with almost no critical response. This is perhaps not surprising - and
it barely mentions any other sociologists, its approach is highly
idiosyncratic, it is as much anthropology and history as it is sociology.
Indeed, the second and third volumes mainly focus on the social formations of
antiquity, and the role of Christianity and the messianic revolutions of the
last millennium in creating a universal history. In this paper I take the
relationship between speech, time and suffering as the key to
Rosenstock-Huessy’s argument for why a theoretical grasp of Christianity as a
social power is so important for social theory, and why he sees Sociology as
a post-Christian form of knowledge. I also make the case for why
Rosenstock-Huessy is an interesting and important social theorist. |
topic |
names tribes empires city-states Israelites Christianity revolutions post-Christian |
url |
http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2015/0353-57381501179C.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cristaudowayne speechtimeandsufferingrosenstockhuessyspostgoetheanpostchristiansociology |
_version_ |
1725872567802134528 |