Peninsula Effects on Birds in a Coastal Landscape: Are Coves More Species Rich than Lobes?

Peninsula effects - decreasing richness with increasing distance along peninsula lobes - have been identified for many taxa on large peninsulas. Peninsula effects are caused by differences in colonization and extinction predicted by island biogeography or by environmental gradients along the peninsu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sam Riffell, Brian Keas, Thomas Burton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Association for Landscape Ecology, Chapter Germany 2012-10-01
Series:Landscape Online
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.landscape-online.org/index.php/lo/article/view/55
id doaj-7a7704ee341a4384b8fdbc9e7316c0d2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7a7704ee341a4384b8fdbc9e7316c0d22020-11-25T01:17:00ZengInternational Association for Landscape Ecology, Chapter GermanyLandscape Online1865-15422012-10-012911510.3097/LO.20122955Peninsula Effects on Birds in a Coastal Landscape: Are Coves More Species Rich than Lobes?Sam Riffell0Brian Keas1Thomas Burton2Department of Wildlife, Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State, MS 39762, United StatesDepartment of Biological and Allied Health Sciences, Ohio Northern University, Ada, OH 45810, United StatesZoology Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United StatesPeninsula effects - decreasing richness with increasing distance along peninsula lobes - have been identified for many taxa on large peninsulas. Peninsula effects are caused by differences in colonization and extinction predicted by island biogeography or by environmental gradients along the peninsula. We compared species-area regressions for cove patches (i.e., mainland) to regressions for lobe patches (i.e., on peninsula tips) for wet meadow birds along a highly interdigitated shoreline (northern Lake Huron, USA). We conducted analysis both with and without accounting for variation in habitat and landscape characteristics (i.e., environmental gradients) of wet meadows. Species-area regressions for coves did not differ from lobes, nor did these results differ when we accounted for gradients. Similarly, few species were more abundant in coves. Peninsula effects may have been lacking because lobe patches were located ≈ 800 m on average from the mainland, and birds are highly mobile and can easily sample patches over these distances. One important caveat was that wet meadow patches > 5 ha were located in coves, so coves would still be important considerations in conservation plans because of the contribution of large patches to reproductive success, dispersal and population dynamics.https://www.landscape-online.org/index.php/lo/article/view/55BirdsCoastal wetlandsGreat lakesPeninsula effect
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sam Riffell
Brian Keas
Thomas Burton
spellingShingle Sam Riffell
Brian Keas
Thomas Burton
Peninsula Effects on Birds in a Coastal Landscape: Are Coves More Species Rich than Lobes?
Landscape Online
Birds
Coastal wetlands
Great lakes
Peninsula effect
author_facet Sam Riffell
Brian Keas
Thomas Burton
author_sort Sam Riffell
title Peninsula Effects on Birds in a Coastal Landscape: Are Coves More Species Rich than Lobes?
title_short Peninsula Effects on Birds in a Coastal Landscape: Are Coves More Species Rich than Lobes?
title_full Peninsula Effects on Birds in a Coastal Landscape: Are Coves More Species Rich than Lobes?
title_fullStr Peninsula Effects on Birds in a Coastal Landscape: Are Coves More Species Rich than Lobes?
title_full_unstemmed Peninsula Effects on Birds in a Coastal Landscape: Are Coves More Species Rich than Lobes?
title_sort peninsula effects on birds in a coastal landscape: are coves more species rich than lobes?
publisher International Association for Landscape Ecology, Chapter Germany
series Landscape Online
issn 1865-1542
publishDate 2012-10-01
description Peninsula effects - decreasing richness with increasing distance along peninsula lobes - have been identified for many taxa on large peninsulas. Peninsula effects are caused by differences in colonization and extinction predicted by island biogeography or by environmental gradients along the peninsula. We compared species-area regressions for cove patches (i.e., mainland) to regressions for lobe patches (i.e., on peninsula tips) for wet meadow birds along a highly interdigitated shoreline (northern Lake Huron, USA). We conducted analysis both with and without accounting for variation in habitat and landscape characteristics (i.e., environmental gradients) of wet meadows. Species-area regressions for coves did not differ from lobes, nor did these results differ when we accounted for gradients. Similarly, few species were more abundant in coves. Peninsula effects may have been lacking because lobe patches were located ≈ 800 m on average from the mainland, and birds are highly mobile and can easily sample patches over these distances. One important caveat was that wet meadow patches > 5 ha were located in coves, so coves would still be important considerations in conservation plans because of the contribution of large patches to reproductive success, dispersal and population dynamics.
topic Birds
Coastal wetlands
Great lakes
Peninsula effect
url https://www.landscape-online.org/index.php/lo/article/view/55
work_keys_str_mv AT samriffell peninsulaeffectsonbirdsinacoastallandscapearecovesmorespeciesrichthanlobes
AT briankeas peninsulaeffectsonbirdsinacoastallandscapearecovesmorespeciesrichthanlobes
AT thomasburton peninsulaeffectsonbirdsinacoastallandscapearecovesmorespeciesrichthanlobes
_version_ 1725148861979164672