Interest contagion in violation-of-expectation-based false-belief tasks
In the debate about how to interpret Violation-of-Expectation (VoE) based false-belief experiments, it has been suggested that infants are predicting the actions of the agent based on more or less sophisticated cognitive means. We present an alternative, more parsimonious interpretation, exploring t...
Main Authors: | Andreas eFalck, Ingar eBrinck, Magnus eLindgren |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00023/full |
Similar Items
-
How to Make Correct Predictions in False Belief Tasks without Attributing False Beliefs: An Analysis of Alternative Inferences and How to Avoid Them
by: Ricardo Augusto Perera, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01) -
What does the False Belief test test?
by: Marco Fenici
Published: (2016-11-01) -
Outcome knowledge and false belief
by: Siba eGhrear, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01) -
False belief vs. false photographs: a test of theory of mind or working memory?
by: Alicia eCallejas, et al.
Published: (2011-11-01) -
“What Was His Name, Again?”: A New Method for Reducing Memory-Based Errors in an Adult False-Belief Task
by: Marea S. Colombo, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)