In vitro comparison of three different image receptors for determining the length of endodontic files

Background/purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of endodontic file length measurements of E-speed radiographs, Digora storage phosphor plates, and Schick charge-coupled device sensors, with a secondary aim of assessing the influence of image enhancement on the measurement accu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Betul Ilhan, Ilgın Akcay, Nesrın Dundar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2014-12-01
Series:Journal of Dental Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790212002152
id doaj-7a574e7d3dc94719a2573fddb93c8c7f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7a574e7d3dc94719a2573fddb93c8c7f2020-11-24T20:51:31ZengElsevierJournal of Dental Sciences1991-79022014-12-019434535010.1016/j.jds.2012.03.025In vitro comparison of three different image receptors for determining the length of endodontic filesBetul Ilhan0Ilgın Akcay1Nesrın Dundar2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, TurkeyDepartment of Endodontology, School of Dentistry, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, TurkeyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, TurkeyBackground/purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of endodontic file length measurements of E-speed radiographs, Digora storage phosphor plates, and Schick charge-coupled device sensors, with a secondary aim of assessing the influence of image enhancement on the measurement accuracy. Materials and methods: Forty-seven extracted mandibular first premolar teeth were selected. ISO size 8, 10, and 15 files were inserted into each canal, and the files were fixed when the tip was seen at the apical foramen. The teeth were mounted in acrylic blocks and exposed using E-speed films, Digora storage phosphor plates, and Schick charge-coupled device sensors. Two radiologists and two endodontists measured the length of each file between the file stopper and tip on each image. Measurements were carried out on original and magnified images as well as on revealer images for Schick CDR. The actual lengths of the files were measured using a calipers to the nearest 0.01 mm and served as the “true length”. Repeated measures analysis of difference and Tukey honestly significant difference tests were used to analyze the data (P < 0.05). Results: E-speed films were superior to digital systems for the measurement accuracy of the size 08 file (P < 0.05). Revealer images gave equivalent results with E-speed films for the measurement of the size 10 file (P > 0.05). The most accurate results were obtained with the size 15 file regardless of the image receptor (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Size 15 or larger files should be used for endodontic working length determinations. Revealer images gave equivalent results with E-speed films and may be utilized for determining the file length of size 10 files.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790212002152digital radiography systemsendodonticsfile length measurementimage enhancementimage receptors
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Betul Ilhan
Ilgın Akcay
Nesrın Dundar
spellingShingle Betul Ilhan
Ilgın Akcay
Nesrın Dundar
In vitro comparison of three different image receptors for determining the length of endodontic files
Journal of Dental Sciences
digital radiography systems
endodontics
file length measurement
image enhancement
image receptors
author_facet Betul Ilhan
Ilgın Akcay
Nesrın Dundar
author_sort Betul Ilhan
title In vitro comparison of three different image receptors for determining the length of endodontic files
title_short In vitro comparison of three different image receptors for determining the length of endodontic files
title_full In vitro comparison of three different image receptors for determining the length of endodontic files
title_fullStr In vitro comparison of three different image receptors for determining the length of endodontic files
title_full_unstemmed In vitro comparison of three different image receptors for determining the length of endodontic files
title_sort in vitro comparison of three different image receptors for determining the length of endodontic files
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Dental Sciences
issn 1991-7902
publishDate 2014-12-01
description Background/purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of endodontic file length measurements of E-speed radiographs, Digora storage phosphor plates, and Schick charge-coupled device sensors, with a secondary aim of assessing the influence of image enhancement on the measurement accuracy. Materials and methods: Forty-seven extracted mandibular first premolar teeth were selected. ISO size 8, 10, and 15 files were inserted into each canal, and the files were fixed when the tip was seen at the apical foramen. The teeth were mounted in acrylic blocks and exposed using E-speed films, Digora storage phosphor plates, and Schick charge-coupled device sensors. Two radiologists and two endodontists measured the length of each file between the file stopper and tip on each image. Measurements were carried out on original and magnified images as well as on revealer images for Schick CDR. The actual lengths of the files were measured using a calipers to the nearest 0.01 mm and served as the “true length”. Repeated measures analysis of difference and Tukey honestly significant difference tests were used to analyze the data (P < 0.05). Results: E-speed films were superior to digital systems for the measurement accuracy of the size 08 file (P < 0.05). Revealer images gave equivalent results with E-speed films for the measurement of the size 10 file (P > 0.05). The most accurate results were obtained with the size 15 file regardless of the image receptor (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Size 15 or larger files should be used for endodontic working length determinations. Revealer images gave equivalent results with E-speed films and may be utilized for determining the file length of size 10 files.
topic digital radiography systems
endodontics
file length measurement
image enhancement
image receptors
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790212002152
work_keys_str_mv AT betulilhan invitrocomparisonofthreedifferentimagereceptorsfordeterminingthelengthofendodonticfiles
AT ilgınakcay invitrocomparisonofthreedifferentimagereceptorsfordeterminingthelengthofendodonticfiles
AT nesrındundar invitrocomparisonofthreedifferentimagereceptorsfordeterminingthelengthofendodonticfiles
_version_ 1716801979712274432