Propofol-based intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in pancreatic cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND:Previous researches have shown that anesthetic techniques can influence the patient outcomes of cancer surgery. Here, we studied the relationship between type of anesthetic and patient outcomes following elective, open pancreatic cancer surgery. METHODS:This was a retrospective cohort stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hou-Chuan Lai, Meei-Shyuan Lee, Yin-Tzu Liu, Kuen-Tze Lin, Kuo-Chuan Hung, Jen-Yin Chen, Zhi-Fu Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233598
id doaj-7a5198f335d748e1b4621565e2d98bae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7a5198f335d748e1b4621565e2d98bae2021-03-03T21:48:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01155e023359810.1371/journal.pone.0233598Propofol-based intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in pancreatic cancer surgery.Hou-Chuan LaiMeei-Shyuan LeeYin-Tzu LiuKuen-Tze LinKuo-Chuan HungJen-Yin ChenZhi-Fu WuBACKGROUND:Previous researches have shown that anesthetic techniques can influence the patient outcomes of cancer surgery. Here, we studied the relationship between type of anesthetic and patient outcomes following elective, open pancreatic cancer surgery. METHODS:This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who received elective, open pancreatic cancer surgery between January 2005 and July 2018. Patients were grouped according to the anesthesia they received, namely desflurane or propofol. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted, and survival curves were presented from the date of surgery to death. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to compare hazard ratios for death after propensity matching. Subgroup analyses were performed for all-cause mortality, cancer-specific mortality, and disease progression. RESULTS:A total of 68 patients (56 deaths, 82.0%) under desflurane anesthesia, and 72 patients (43 deaths, 60.0%) under propofol anesthesia were included. Fifty-eight patients remained in each group after propensity matching. The propofol anesthesia was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.99; P = 0.047) in the matched analysis. Subgroup analyses showed significantly better cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.97; P = 0.037) in the propofol group. Additionally, patients under propofol had less postoperative recurrence, but not fewer postoperative metastases formation, than those under desflurane (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.90; P = 0.028) in the matched analysis. CONCLUSIONS:In a limited sample size, we observed that propofol anesthesia was associated with improved survival in open pancreatic cancer surgery compared with desflurane anesthesia. Further investigations are needed to inspect the influences of propofol anesthesia on patient outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233598
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hou-Chuan Lai
Meei-Shyuan Lee
Yin-Tzu Liu
Kuen-Tze Lin
Kuo-Chuan Hung
Jen-Yin Chen
Zhi-Fu Wu
spellingShingle Hou-Chuan Lai
Meei-Shyuan Lee
Yin-Tzu Liu
Kuen-Tze Lin
Kuo-Chuan Hung
Jen-Yin Chen
Zhi-Fu Wu
Propofol-based intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in pancreatic cancer surgery.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Hou-Chuan Lai
Meei-Shyuan Lee
Yin-Tzu Liu
Kuen-Tze Lin
Kuo-Chuan Hung
Jen-Yin Chen
Zhi-Fu Wu
author_sort Hou-Chuan Lai
title Propofol-based intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in pancreatic cancer surgery.
title_short Propofol-based intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in pancreatic cancer surgery.
title_full Propofol-based intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in pancreatic cancer surgery.
title_fullStr Propofol-based intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in pancreatic cancer surgery.
title_full_unstemmed Propofol-based intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in pancreatic cancer surgery.
title_sort propofol-based intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in pancreatic cancer surgery.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description BACKGROUND:Previous researches have shown that anesthetic techniques can influence the patient outcomes of cancer surgery. Here, we studied the relationship between type of anesthetic and patient outcomes following elective, open pancreatic cancer surgery. METHODS:This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who received elective, open pancreatic cancer surgery between January 2005 and July 2018. Patients were grouped according to the anesthesia they received, namely desflurane or propofol. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted, and survival curves were presented from the date of surgery to death. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to compare hazard ratios for death after propensity matching. Subgroup analyses were performed for all-cause mortality, cancer-specific mortality, and disease progression. RESULTS:A total of 68 patients (56 deaths, 82.0%) under desflurane anesthesia, and 72 patients (43 deaths, 60.0%) under propofol anesthesia were included. Fifty-eight patients remained in each group after propensity matching. The propofol anesthesia was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.99; P = 0.047) in the matched analysis. Subgroup analyses showed significantly better cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.97; P = 0.037) in the propofol group. Additionally, patients under propofol had less postoperative recurrence, but not fewer postoperative metastases formation, than those under desflurane (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.90; P = 0.028) in the matched analysis. CONCLUSIONS:In a limited sample size, we observed that propofol anesthesia was associated with improved survival in open pancreatic cancer surgery compared with desflurane anesthesia. Further investigations are needed to inspect the influences of propofol anesthesia on patient outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233598
work_keys_str_mv AT houchuanlai propofolbasedintravenousanesthesiaisassociatedwithbettersurvivalthandesfluraneanesthesiainpancreaticcancersurgery
AT meeishyuanlee propofolbasedintravenousanesthesiaisassociatedwithbettersurvivalthandesfluraneanesthesiainpancreaticcancersurgery
AT yintzuliu propofolbasedintravenousanesthesiaisassociatedwithbettersurvivalthandesfluraneanesthesiainpancreaticcancersurgery
AT kuentzelin propofolbasedintravenousanesthesiaisassociatedwithbettersurvivalthandesfluraneanesthesiainpancreaticcancersurgery
AT kuochuanhung propofolbasedintravenousanesthesiaisassociatedwithbettersurvivalthandesfluraneanesthesiainpancreaticcancersurgery
AT jenyinchen propofolbasedintravenousanesthesiaisassociatedwithbettersurvivalthandesfluraneanesthesiainpancreaticcancersurgery
AT zhifuwu propofolbasedintravenousanesthesiaisassociatedwithbettersurvivalthandesfluraneanesthesiainpancreaticcancersurgery
_version_ 1714815046316457984