Trust Strategies for Coordinating Interests in Education

The purpose of this article is to show how a coordination of interests in education occurs based on trust. Trust in sociology of education is usually understood as an indicator or a foundation of social consensus. In the latter case, researchers focus on the essential characteristics of trust (trans...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Igor S. Kuznetsov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology 2019-06-01
Series:Социологический журнал
Online Access:http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/6390/submission/proof/6390-61-11867-1-10-20190627.pdf
id doaj-7a500f725d4a403c98c0c1a2b2630f80
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7a500f725d4a403c98c0c1a2b2630f802020-11-25T02:59:23ZrusRussian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied SociologyСоциологический журнал1562-24952019-06-0125213815210.19181/socjour.2019.25.2.63906390Trust Strategies for Coordinating Interests in EducationIgor S. Kuznetsov0Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RASThe purpose of this article is to show how a coordination of interests in education occurs based on trust. Trust in sociology of education is usually understood as an indicator or a foundation of social consensus. In the latter case, researchers focus on the essential characteristics of trust (transparency, openness, etc.). However, such an understanding only fixates a certain state of interaction, or just prepares the ground for it. In this text, the focus is on ways or strategies of trust. They allow us to see not only the existence of a consensus, but also how it is achieved. In this case, we are not talking about the best or only form of consensus, which is often identified with the notion of ‘‘quality education’’. The emphasis is on there existing many forms of consent in the field of education. The source of legitimacy for justifying the transition from single to multiple forms was the joint research work of L. Boltanski and L. Theveno on the problem of reconciliation of interests. Different forms of consent arise when the expectations of interested participants in interactions are justified. Thus, the basis for their occurrence is not a reference to a bad or good education, but to how much it meets expectations or does not meet expectations.http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/6390/submission/proof/6390-61-11867-1-10-20190627.pdf
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Igor S. Kuznetsov
spellingShingle Igor S. Kuznetsov
Trust Strategies for Coordinating Interests in Education
Социологический журнал
author_facet Igor S. Kuznetsov
author_sort Igor S. Kuznetsov
title Trust Strategies for Coordinating Interests in Education
title_short Trust Strategies for Coordinating Interests in Education
title_full Trust Strategies for Coordinating Interests in Education
title_fullStr Trust Strategies for Coordinating Interests in Education
title_full_unstemmed Trust Strategies for Coordinating Interests in Education
title_sort trust strategies for coordinating interests in education
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
series Социологический журнал
issn 1562-2495
publishDate 2019-06-01
description The purpose of this article is to show how a coordination of interests in education occurs based on trust. Trust in sociology of education is usually understood as an indicator or a foundation of social consensus. In the latter case, researchers focus on the essential characteristics of trust (transparency, openness, etc.). However, such an understanding only fixates a certain state of interaction, or just prepares the ground for it. In this text, the focus is on ways or strategies of trust. They allow us to see not only the existence of a consensus, but also how it is achieved. In this case, we are not talking about the best or only form of consensus, which is often identified with the notion of ‘‘quality education’’. The emphasis is on there existing many forms of consent in the field of education. The source of legitimacy for justifying the transition from single to multiple forms was the joint research work of L. Boltanski and L. Theveno on the problem of reconciliation of interests. Different forms of consent arise when the expectations of interested participants in interactions are justified. Thus, the basis for their occurrence is not a reference to a bad or good education, but to how much it meets expectations or does not meet expectations.
url http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/6390/submission/proof/6390-61-11867-1-10-20190627.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT igorskuznetsov truststrategiesforcoordinatinginterestsineducation
_version_ 1724702669925253120