Adapting the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care (QMNC) Framework to evaluate models of antenatal care: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND:Recent evidence indicates that continuity models of maternity care result in improved clinical and psychosocial outcomes, but their causal mechanisms are poorly understood. The recent Lancet Series on Midwifery's Quality Maternal and Newborn Care Framework describes five components o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew Symon, Alison McFadden, Marianne White, Katrina Fraser, Allison Cummins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6091915?pdf=render
id doaj-7a46c7fd02194759bdfdd9b61c386467
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7a46c7fd02194759bdfdd9b61c3864672020-11-25T00:02:09ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01138e020064010.1371/journal.pone.0200640Adapting the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care (QMNC) Framework to evaluate models of antenatal care: A pilot study.Andrew SymonAlison McFaddenMarianne WhiteKatrina FraserAllison CumminsBACKGROUND:Recent evidence indicates that continuity models of maternity care result in improved clinical and psychosocial outcomes, but their causal mechanisms are poorly understood. The recent Lancet Series on Midwifery's Quality Maternal and Newborn Care Framework describes five components of quality care and their associated characteristics. As an initial step in developing this Framework into an evaluation toolkit, we transformed its components and characteristics into a topic guide to assess stakeholder perceptions and experiences of care provided and received. The main purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of this process. METHODS:We conducted twelve focus groups in two Scottish health board areas with 13 pregnant women, 18 new mothers, 26 midwives and 12 obstetricians who had experience of a range of different models of maternity care. Transcripts were analysed using a six-phase approach of thematic analysis. We mapped the identified themes and sub-themes back to the Framework. RESULTS:The emerging themes and sub-themes demonstrated the feasibility of using the QMNC framework as a data collection tool, and as a lens for analysing the data. Of the four emerging themes, only Organisation Culture / Work Structure' mapped directly to a single Framework component. The others-'Relationships'; 'Information and support'; and 'Uncertainty'-mapped to between two and five components, illustrating the interconnectedness of the Framework's components. Some negative sub-themes mirrored positive Framework characteristics of care. Some re-phrasing and re-ordering of the topic guides in later focus groups ensured we could cover all aspects of the Framework adequately. CONCLUSION:Adapting the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care Framework enabled us to focus on aspects of care which worked well and which didn't work well for these key stakeholders. Identifying 'what works for whom and why' in different models of care is a necessary step in reinforcing and replicating the most effective models of care.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6091915?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrew Symon
Alison McFadden
Marianne White
Katrina Fraser
Allison Cummins
spellingShingle Andrew Symon
Alison McFadden
Marianne White
Katrina Fraser
Allison Cummins
Adapting the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care (QMNC) Framework to evaluate models of antenatal care: A pilot study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Andrew Symon
Alison McFadden
Marianne White
Katrina Fraser
Allison Cummins
author_sort Andrew Symon
title Adapting the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care (QMNC) Framework to evaluate models of antenatal care: A pilot study.
title_short Adapting the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care (QMNC) Framework to evaluate models of antenatal care: A pilot study.
title_full Adapting the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care (QMNC) Framework to evaluate models of antenatal care: A pilot study.
title_fullStr Adapting the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care (QMNC) Framework to evaluate models of antenatal care: A pilot study.
title_full_unstemmed Adapting the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care (QMNC) Framework to evaluate models of antenatal care: A pilot study.
title_sort adapting the quality maternal and newborn care (qmnc) framework to evaluate models of antenatal care: a pilot study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description BACKGROUND:Recent evidence indicates that continuity models of maternity care result in improved clinical and psychosocial outcomes, but their causal mechanisms are poorly understood. The recent Lancet Series on Midwifery's Quality Maternal and Newborn Care Framework describes five components of quality care and their associated characteristics. As an initial step in developing this Framework into an evaluation toolkit, we transformed its components and characteristics into a topic guide to assess stakeholder perceptions and experiences of care provided and received. The main purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of this process. METHODS:We conducted twelve focus groups in two Scottish health board areas with 13 pregnant women, 18 new mothers, 26 midwives and 12 obstetricians who had experience of a range of different models of maternity care. Transcripts were analysed using a six-phase approach of thematic analysis. We mapped the identified themes and sub-themes back to the Framework. RESULTS:The emerging themes and sub-themes demonstrated the feasibility of using the QMNC framework as a data collection tool, and as a lens for analysing the data. Of the four emerging themes, only Organisation Culture / Work Structure' mapped directly to a single Framework component. The others-'Relationships'; 'Information and support'; and 'Uncertainty'-mapped to between two and five components, illustrating the interconnectedness of the Framework's components. Some negative sub-themes mirrored positive Framework characteristics of care. Some re-phrasing and re-ordering of the topic guides in later focus groups ensured we could cover all aspects of the Framework adequately. CONCLUSION:Adapting the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care Framework enabled us to focus on aspects of care which worked well and which didn't work well for these key stakeholders. Identifying 'what works for whom and why' in different models of care is a necessary step in reinforcing and replicating the most effective models of care.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6091915?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewsymon adaptingthequalitymaternalandnewborncareqmncframeworktoevaluatemodelsofantenatalcareapilotstudy
AT alisonmcfadden adaptingthequalitymaternalandnewborncareqmncframeworktoevaluatemodelsofantenatalcareapilotstudy
AT mariannewhite adaptingthequalitymaternalandnewborncareqmncframeworktoevaluatemodelsofantenatalcareapilotstudy
AT katrinafraser adaptingthequalitymaternalandnewborncareqmncframeworktoevaluatemodelsofantenatalcareapilotstudy
AT allisoncummins adaptingthequalitymaternalandnewborncareqmncframeworktoevaluatemodelsofantenatalcareapilotstudy
_version_ 1725439108222812160