Skull Triangles: Flinders Petrie, Race Theory and Biometrics
In 1902 the Egyptian archaeologist William Matthew Flinders Petrie published a graph of triangles indicating skull size, shape and ‘racial ability’. In the same year a paper on Naqada crania that had been excavated by Petrie’s team in 1894–5 was published in the anthropometric journal Biometrika, wh...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2016-02-01
|
Series: | Bulletin of the History of Archaeology |
Online Access: | http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/articles/556 |
id |
doaj-7a18b8c53fc84f578b3ef272fc4da025 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7a18b8c53fc84f578b3ef272fc4da0252020-11-24T21:03:05ZengUbiquity PressBulletin of the History of Archaeology1062-47402047-69302016-02-0126110.5334/bha-556566Skull Triangles: Flinders Petrie, Race Theory and BiometricsDebbie Challis0Petrie Museum of Egyptian Archaeology, UCLIn 1902 the Egyptian archaeologist William Matthew Flinders Petrie published a graph of triangles indicating skull size, shape and ‘racial ability’. In the same year a paper on Naqada crania that had been excavated by Petrie’s team in 1894–5 was published in the anthropometric journal Biometrika, which played an important part in the methodology of cranial measuring in biometrics and helped establish Karl Pearson’s biometric laboratory at University College London. Cicely D. Fawcett’s and Alice Lee’s paper on the variation and correlation of the human skull used the Naqada crania to argue for a controlled system of measurement of skull size and shape to establish homogeneous racial groups, patterns of migration and evolutionary development. Their work was more cautious in tone and judgement than Petrie’s pronouncements on the racial origins of the early Egyptians but both the graph and the paper illustrated shared ideas about skull size, shape, statistical analysis and the ability and need to define ‘race’. This paper explores how Petrie shared his archaeological work with a broad number of people and disciplines, including statistics and biometrics, and the context for measuring and analysing skulls at the turn of the twentieth century.http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/articles/556 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Debbie Challis |
spellingShingle |
Debbie Challis Skull Triangles: Flinders Petrie, Race Theory and Biometrics Bulletin of the History of Archaeology |
author_facet |
Debbie Challis |
author_sort |
Debbie Challis |
title |
Skull Triangles: Flinders Petrie, Race Theory and Biometrics |
title_short |
Skull Triangles: Flinders Petrie, Race Theory and Biometrics |
title_full |
Skull Triangles: Flinders Petrie, Race Theory and Biometrics |
title_fullStr |
Skull Triangles: Flinders Petrie, Race Theory and Biometrics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Skull Triangles: Flinders Petrie, Race Theory and Biometrics |
title_sort |
skull triangles: flinders petrie, race theory and biometrics |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
Bulletin of the History of Archaeology |
issn |
1062-4740 2047-6930 |
publishDate |
2016-02-01 |
description |
In 1902 the Egyptian archaeologist William Matthew Flinders Petrie published a graph of triangles indicating skull size, shape and ‘racial ability’. In the same year a paper on Naqada crania that had been excavated by Petrie’s team in 1894–5 was published in the anthropometric journal Biometrika, which played an important part in the methodology of cranial measuring in biometrics and helped establish Karl Pearson’s biometric laboratory at University College London. Cicely D. Fawcett’s and Alice Lee’s paper on the variation and correlation of the human skull used the Naqada crania to argue for a controlled system of measurement of skull size and shape to establish homogeneous racial groups, patterns of migration and evolutionary development. Their work was more cautious in tone and judgement than Petrie’s pronouncements on the racial origins of the early Egyptians but both the graph and the paper illustrated shared ideas about skull size, shape, statistical analysis and the ability and need to define ‘race’. This paper explores how Petrie shared his archaeological work with a broad number of people and disciplines, including statistics and biometrics, and the context for measuring and analysing skulls at the turn of the twentieth century. |
url |
http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/articles/556 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT debbiechallis skulltrianglesflinderspetrieracetheoryandbiometrics |
_version_ |
1716774195879215104 |