Skull Triangles: Flinders Petrie, Race Theory and Biometrics

In 1902 the Egyptian archaeologist William Matthew Flinders Petrie published a graph of triangles indicating skull size, shape and ‘racial ability’. In the same year a paper on Naqada crania that had been excavated by Petrie’s team in 1894–5 was published in the anthropometric journal Biometrika, wh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Debbie Challis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2016-02-01
Series:Bulletin of the History of Archaeology
Online Access:http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/articles/556
id doaj-7a18b8c53fc84f578b3ef272fc4da025
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7a18b8c53fc84f578b3ef272fc4da0252020-11-24T21:03:05ZengUbiquity PressBulletin of the History of Archaeology1062-47402047-69302016-02-0126110.5334/bha-556566Skull Triangles: Flinders Petrie, Race Theory and BiometricsDebbie Challis0Petrie Museum of Egyptian Archaeology, UCLIn 1902 the Egyptian archaeologist William Matthew Flinders Petrie published a graph of triangles indicating skull size, shape and ‘racial ability’. In the same year a paper on Naqada crania that had been excavated by Petrie’s team in 1894–5 was published in the anthropometric journal Biometrika, which played an important part in the methodology of cranial measuring in biometrics and helped establish Karl Pearson’s biometric laboratory at University College London. Cicely D. Fawcett’s and Alice Lee’s paper on the variation and correlation of the human skull used the Naqada crania to argue for a controlled system of measurement of skull size and shape to establish homogeneous racial groups, patterns of migration and evolutionary development. Their work was more cautious in tone and judgement than Petrie’s pronouncements on the racial origins of the early Egyptians but both the graph and the paper illustrated shared ideas about skull size, shape, statistical analysis and the ability and need to define ‘race’. This paper explores how Petrie shared his archaeological work with a broad number of people and disciplines, including statistics and biometrics, and the context for measuring and analysing skulls at the turn of the twentieth century.http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/articles/556
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Debbie Challis
spellingShingle Debbie Challis
Skull Triangles: Flinders Petrie, Race Theory and Biometrics
Bulletin of the History of Archaeology
author_facet Debbie Challis
author_sort Debbie Challis
title Skull Triangles: Flinders Petrie, Race Theory and Biometrics
title_short Skull Triangles: Flinders Petrie, Race Theory and Biometrics
title_full Skull Triangles: Flinders Petrie, Race Theory and Biometrics
title_fullStr Skull Triangles: Flinders Petrie, Race Theory and Biometrics
title_full_unstemmed Skull Triangles: Flinders Petrie, Race Theory and Biometrics
title_sort skull triangles: flinders petrie, race theory and biometrics
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Bulletin of the History of Archaeology
issn 1062-4740
2047-6930
publishDate 2016-02-01
description In 1902 the Egyptian archaeologist William Matthew Flinders Petrie published a graph of triangles indicating skull size, shape and ‘racial ability’. In the same year a paper on Naqada crania that had been excavated by Petrie’s team in 1894–5 was published in the anthropometric journal Biometrika, which played an important part in the methodology of cranial measuring in biometrics and helped establish Karl Pearson’s biometric laboratory at University College London. Cicely D. Fawcett’s and Alice Lee’s paper on the variation and correlation of the human skull used the Naqada crania to argue for a controlled system of measurement of skull size and shape to establish homogeneous racial groups, patterns of migration and evolutionary development. Their work was more cautious in tone and judgement than Petrie’s pronouncements on the racial origins of the early Egyptians but both the graph and the paper illustrated shared ideas about skull size, shape, statistical analysis and the ability and need to define ‘race’. This paper explores how Petrie shared his archaeological work with a broad number of people and disciplines, including statistics and biometrics, and the context for measuring and analysing skulls at the turn of the twentieth century.
url http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/articles/556
work_keys_str_mv AT debbiechallis skulltrianglesflinderspetrieracetheoryandbiometrics
_version_ 1716774195879215104