Early unusual ozone loss during the Arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters

Ozone loss during the winter 2002/2003 has been evaluated from comparisons between total ozone reported by the SAOZ network and simulated in passive mode by both REPROBUS and SLIMCAT. Despite the fact that the two models have a different approach to calculate the descent inside vortex, both evaluati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Goutail, J.-P. Pommereau, F. Lefèvre, M. van Roozendael, S. B. Andersen, B.-A. Kåstad Høiskar, V. Dorokhov, E. Kyrö, M. P. Chipperfield, W. Feng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2005-01-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/665/2005/acp-5-665-2005.pdf
id doaj-79ffc6d82bfa41f386df2c25f4333bb6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-79ffc6d82bfa41f386df2c25f4333bb62020-11-24T22:42:40ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242005-01-0153665677Early unusual ozone loss during the Arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other wintersF. GoutailJ.-P. PommereauF. LefèvreM. van RoozendaelS. B. AndersenB.-A. Kåstad HøiskarV. DorokhovE. KyröM. P. ChipperfieldW. FengOzone loss during the winter 2002/2003 has been evaluated from comparisons between total ozone reported by the SAOZ network and simulated in passive mode by both REPROBUS and SLIMCAT. Despite the fact that the two models have a different approach to calculate the descent inside vortex, both evaluations provide similar results 18&plusmn;4% using REPROBUS and 20&plusmn;4% using SLIMCAT and show that the loss started around mid-December, at least ten to twenty days earlier than during any of the previous eleven winters, except 1993/1994. This unusual behaviour is consistent with the low temperatures reported in the stratosphere as well to the signature of early chlorine activation indicated by ground-based, balloon and satellite observations. <P style='line-height: 20px;'> A significant ozone loss is also simulated by the current versions of two models, but of lesser amplitude compared to SAOZ, 13&plusmn;2% for REPROBUS and 16&plusmn;2% for SLIMCAT, the underestimation being already observed by mid-January. The early ozone depletion captured by both model show that chemical depletion did indeed take place in December, predominantly at the illuminated edge of the distorted vortex, but the reason for the underestimation compared to the observations and the differences among the models have still to be investigated.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/665/2005/acp-5-665-2005.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author F. Goutail
J.-P. Pommereau
F. Lefèvre
M. van Roozendael
S. B. Andersen
B.-A. Kåstad Høiskar
V. Dorokhov
E. Kyrö
M. P. Chipperfield
W. Feng
spellingShingle F. Goutail
J.-P. Pommereau
F. Lefèvre
M. van Roozendael
S. B. Andersen
B.-A. Kåstad Høiskar
V. Dorokhov
E. Kyrö
M. P. Chipperfield
W. Feng
Early unusual ozone loss during the Arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet F. Goutail
J.-P. Pommereau
F. Lefèvre
M. van Roozendael
S. B. Andersen
B.-A. Kåstad Høiskar
V. Dorokhov
E. Kyrö
M. P. Chipperfield
W. Feng
author_sort F. Goutail
title Early unusual ozone loss during the Arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters
title_short Early unusual ozone loss during the Arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters
title_full Early unusual ozone loss during the Arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters
title_fullStr Early unusual ozone loss during the Arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters
title_full_unstemmed Early unusual ozone loss during the Arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters
title_sort early unusual ozone loss during the arctic winter 2002/2003 compared to other winters
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2005-01-01
description Ozone loss during the winter 2002/2003 has been evaluated from comparisons between total ozone reported by the SAOZ network and simulated in passive mode by both REPROBUS and SLIMCAT. Despite the fact that the two models have a different approach to calculate the descent inside vortex, both evaluations provide similar results 18&plusmn;4% using REPROBUS and 20&plusmn;4% using SLIMCAT and show that the loss started around mid-December, at least ten to twenty days earlier than during any of the previous eleven winters, except 1993/1994. This unusual behaviour is consistent with the low temperatures reported in the stratosphere as well to the signature of early chlorine activation indicated by ground-based, balloon and satellite observations. <P style='line-height: 20px;'> A significant ozone loss is also simulated by the current versions of two models, but of lesser amplitude compared to SAOZ, 13&plusmn;2% for REPROBUS and 16&plusmn;2% for SLIMCAT, the underestimation being already observed by mid-January. The early ozone depletion captured by both model show that chemical depletion did indeed take place in December, predominantly at the illuminated edge of the distorted vortex, but the reason for the underestimation compared to the observations and the differences among the models have still to be investigated.
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/665/2005/acp-5-665-2005.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fgoutail earlyunusualozonelossduringthearcticwinter20022003comparedtootherwinters
AT jppommereau earlyunusualozonelossduringthearcticwinter20022003comparedtootherwinters
AT flefevre earlyunusualozonelossduringthearcticwinter20022003comparedtootherwinters
AT mvanroozendael earlyunusualozonelossduringthearcticwinter20022003comparedtootherwinters
AT sbandersen earlyunusualozonelossduringthearcticwinter20022003comparedtootherwinters
AT bakastadhøiskar earlyunusualozonelossduringthearcticwinter20022003comparedtootherwinters
AT vdorokhov earlyunusualozonelossduringthearcticwinter20022003comparedtootherwinters
AT ekyro earlyunusualozonelossduringthearcticwinter20022003comparedtootherwinters
AT mpchipperfield earlyunusualozonelossduringthearcticwinter20022003comparedtootherwinters
AT wfeng earlyunusualozonelossduringthearcticwinter20022003comparedtootherwinters
_version_ 1725699021852377088