Macro-indicators of citation impacts of six prolific countries: InCites data and the statistical significance of trends.

Using the InCites tool of Thomson Reuters, this study compares normalized citation impact values calculated for China, Japan, France, Germany, United States, and the UK throughout the time period from 1981 to 2010. InCites offers a unique opportunity to study the normalized citation impacts of count...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lutz Bornmann, Loet Leydesdorff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3572076?pdf=render
id doaj-79ffb4cd57424d339ba527c7202ef5c3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-79ffb4cd57424d339ba527c7202ef5c32020-11-24T22:16:34ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0182e5676810.1371/journal.pone.0056768Macro-indicators of citation impacts of six prolific countries: InCites data and the statistical significance of trends.Lutz BornmannLoet LeydesdorffUsing the InCites tool of Thomson Reuters, this study compares normalized citation impact values calculated for China, Japan, France, Germany, United States, and the UK throughout the time period from 1981 to 2010. InCites offers a unique opportunity to study the normalized citation impacts of countries using (i) a long publication window (1981 to 2010), (ii) a differentiation in (broad or more narrow) subject areas, and (iii) allowing for the use of statistical procedures in order to obtain an insightful investigation of national citation trends across the years. Using four broad categories, our results show significantly increasing trends in citation impact values for France, the UK, and especially Germany across the last thirty years in all areas. The citation impact of papers from China is still at a relatively low level (mostly below the world average), but the country follows an increasing trend line. The USA exhibits a stable pattern of high citation impact values across the years. With small impact differences between the publication years, the US trend is increasing in engineering and technology but decreasing in medical and health sciences as well as in agricultural sciences. Similar to the USA, Japan follows increasing as well as decreasing trends in different subject areas, but the variability across the years is small. In most of the years, papers from Japan perform below or approximately at the world average in each subject area.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3572076?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lutz Bornmann
Loet Leydesdorff
spellingShingle Lutz Bornmann
Loet Leydesdorff
Macro-indicators of citation impacts of six prolific countries: InCites data and the statistical significance of trends.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Lutz Bornmann
Loet Leydesdorff
author_sort Lutz Bornmann
title Macro-indicators of citation impacts of six prolific countries: InCites data and the statistical significance of trends.
title_short Macro-indicators of citation impacts of six prolific countries: InCites data and the statistical significance of trends.
title_full Macro-indicators of citation impacts of six prolific countries: InCites data and the statistical significance of trends.
title_fullStr Macro-indicators of citation impacts of six prolific countries: InCites data and the statistical significance of trends.
title_full_unstemmed Macro-indicators of citation impacts of six prolific countries: InCites data and the statistical significance of trends.
title_sort macro-indicators of citation impacts of six prolific countries: incites data and the statistical significance of trends.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Using the InCites tool of Thomson Reuters, this study compares normalized citation impact values calculated for China, Japan, France, Germany, United States, and the UK throughout the time period from 1981 to 2010. InCites offers a unique opportunity to study the normalized citation impacts of countries using (i) a long publication window (1981 to 2010), (ii) a differentiation in (broad or more narrow) subject areas, and (iii) allowing for the use of statistical procedures in order to obtain an insightful investigation of national citation trends across the years. Using four broad categories, our results show significantly increasing trends in citation impact values for France, the UK, and especially Germany across the last thirty years in all areas. The citation impact of papers from China is still at a relatively low level (mostly below the world average), but the country follows an increasing trend line. The USA exhibits a stable pattern of high citation impact values across the years. With small impact differences between the publication years, the US trend is increasing in engineering and technology but decreasing in medical and health sciences as well as in agricultural sciences. Similar to the USA, Japan follows increasing as well as decreasing trends in different subject areas, but the variability across the years is small. In most of the years, papers from Japan perform below or approximately at the world average in each subject area.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3572076?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT lutzbornmann macroindicatorsofcitationimpactsofsixprolificcountriesincitesdataandthestatisticalsignificanceoftrends
AT loetleydesdorff macroindicatorsofcitationimpactsofsixprolificcountriesincitesdataandthestatisticalsignificanceoftrends
_version_ 1725789117909827584