Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND:Different laboratory methods are used to quantify ferritin concentrations as a marker of iron status. A systematic review was undertaken to assess the accuracy and comparability of the most used methods for ferritin detection. METHODS AND FINDINGS:National and regional databases were sear...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5933730?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-79e3360cc81a4d95af2bf614f2ea21aa |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-79e3360cc81a4d95af2bf614f2ea21aa2020-11-25T01:29:30ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01135e019657610.1371/journal.pone.0196576Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Maria N Garcia-CasalJuan P Peña-RosasEloisa UrrechagaJesus F EscaneroJunsheng HuoRicardo X MartinezLucero Lopez-PerezBACKGROUND:Different laboratory methods are used to quantify ferritin concentrations as a marker of iron status. A systematic review was undertaken to assess the accuracy and comparability of the most used methods for ferritin detection. METHODS AND FINDINGS:National and regional databases were searched for prospective, retrospective, sectional, longitudinal and case-control studies containing the characteristics and performance of at least one method for serum/plasma ferritin determinations in humans published to date. The analysis included the comparison between at least 2 methods detailing: sensitivity, precision, accuracy, predictive values, inter-methods adjustment, and use of international reference materials. Pooled method performance was analyzed for each method and across methods. OUTCOMES:Search strategy identified 11893 records. After de-duplication and screening 252 studies were assessed, including 187 studies in the qualitative analysis and 148 in the meta-analysis. The most used methods included radiometric, nonradiometric and agglutination assays. The overall within-run imprecision for the most reported ferritin methods was 6.2±3.4% (CI 5.69-6.70%; n = 171), between-run imprecision 8.9±8.7% (CI 7.44-10.35%; n = 136), and recovery rate 95.6% (CI 91.5-99.7%; n = 94). The pooled regression coefficient was 0.985 among all methods analyzed, and 0.984 when comparing nonradiometric and radiometric methods, without statistical differences in ferritin concentration ranging from 2.3 to 1454 μμg/L. CONCLUSION:The laboratory methods most used to determine ferritin concentrations have comparable accuracy and performance. Registered in PROSPERO CRD42016036222.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5933730?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maria N Garcia-Casal Juan P Peña-Rosas Eloisa Urrechaga Jesus F Escanero Junsheng Huo Ricardo X Martinez Lucero Lopez-Perez |
spellingShingle |
Maria N Garcia-Casal Juan P Peña-Rosas Eloisa Urrechaga Jesus F Escanero Junsheng Huo Ricardo X Martinez Lucero Lopez-Perez Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Maria N Garcia-Casal Juan P Peña-Rosas Eloisa Urrechaga Jesus F Escanero Junsheng Huo Ricardo X Martinez Lucero Lopez-Perez |
author_sort |
Maria N Garcia-Casal |
title |
Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. |
title_short |
Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. |
title_full |
Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. |
title_fullStr |
Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. |
title_sort |
performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
BACKGROUND:Different laboratory methods are used to quantify ferritin concentrations as a marker of iron status. A systematic review was undertaken to assess the accuracy and comparability of the most used methods for ferritin detection. METHODS AND FINDINGS:National and regional databases were searched for prospective, retrospective, sectional, longitudinal and case-control studies containing the characteristics and performance of at least one method for serum/plasma ferritin determinations in humans published to date. The analysis included the comparison between at least 2 methods detailing: sensitivity, precision, accuracy, predictive values, inter-methods adjustment, and use of international reference materials. Pooled method performance was analyzed for each method and across methods. OUTCOMES:Search strategy identified 11893 records. After de-duplication and screening 252 studies were assessed, including 187 studies in the qualitative analysis and 148 in the meta-analysis. The most used methods included radiometric, nonradiometric and agglutination assays. The overall within-run imprecision for the most reported ferritin methods was 6.2±3.4% (CI 5.69-6.70%; n = 171), between-run imprecision 8.9±8.7% (CI 7.44-10.35%; n = 136), and recovery rate 95.6% (CI 91.5-99.7%; n = 94). The pooled regression coefficient was 0.985 among all methods analyzed, and 0.984 when comparing nonradiometric and radiometric methods, without statistical differences in ferritin concentration ranging from 2.3 to 1454 μμg/L. CONCLUSION:The laboratory methods most used to determine ferritin concentrations have comparable accuracy and performance. Registered in PROSPERO CRD42016036222. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5933730?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mariangarciacasal performanceandcomparabilityoflaboratorymethodsformeasuringferritinconcentrationsinhumanserumorplasmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT juanppenarosas performanceandcomparabilityoflaboratorymethodsformeasuringferritinconcentrationsinhumanserumorplasmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT eloisaurrechaga performanceandcomparabilityoflaboratorymethodsformeasuringferritinconcentrationsinhumanserumorplasmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jesusfescanero performanceandcomparabilityoflaboratorymethodsformeasuringferritinconcentrationsinhumanserumorplasmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT junshenghuo performanceandcomparabilityoflaboratorymethodsformeasuringferritinconcentrationsinhumanserumorplasmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ricardoxmartinez performanceandcomparabilityoflaboratorymethodsformeasuringferritinconcentrationsinhumanserumorplasmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lucerolopezperez performanceandcomparabilityoflaboratorymethodsformeasuringferritinconcentrationsinhumanserumorplasmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1725096637131390976 |