Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND:Different laboratory methods are used to quantify ferritin concentrations as a marker of iron status. A systematic review was undertaken to assess the accuracy and comparability of the most used methods for ferritin detection. METHODS AND FINDINGS:National and regional databases were sear...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria N Garcia-Casal, Juan P Peña-Rosas, Eloisa Urrechaga, Jesus F Escanero, Junsheng Huo, Ricardo X Martinez, Lucero Lopez-Perez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5933730?pdf=render
id doaj-79e3360cc81a4d95af2bf614f2ea21aa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-79e3360cc81a4d95af2bf614f2ea21aa2020-11-25T01:29:30ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01135e019657610.1371/journal.pone.0196576Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Maria N Garcia-CasalJuan P Peña-RosasEloisa UrrechagaJesus F EscaneroJunsheng HuoRicardo X MartinezLucero Lopez-PerezBACKGROUND:Different laboratory methods are used to quantify ferritin concentrations as a marker of iron status. A systematic review was undertaken to assess the accuracy and comparability of the most used methods for ferritin detection. METHODS AND FINDINGS:National and regional databases were searched for prospective, retrospective, sectional, longitudinal and case-control studies containing the characteristics and performance of at least one method for serum/plasma ferritin determinations in humans published to date. The analysis included the comparison between at least 2 methods detailing: sensitivity, precision, accuracy, predictive values, inter-methods adjustment, and use of international reference materials. Pooled method performance was analyzed for each method and across methods. OUTCOMES:Search strategy identified 11893 records. After de-duplication and screening 252 studies were assessed, including 187 studies in the qualitative analysis and 148 in the meta-analysis. The most used methods included radiometric, nonradiometric and agglutination assays. The overall within-run imprecision for the most reported ferritin methods was 6.2±3.4% (CI 5.69-6.70%; n = 171), between-run imprecision 8.9±8.7% (CI 7.44-10.35%; n = 136), and recovery rate 95.6% (CI 91.5-99.7%; n = 94). The pooled regression coefficient was 0.985 among all methods analyzed, and 0.984 when comparing nonradiometric and radiometric methods, without statistical differences in ferritin concentration ranging from 2.3 to 1454 μμg/L. CONCLUSION:The laboratory methods most used to determine ferritin concentrations have comparable accuracy and performance. Registered in PROSPERO CRD42016036222.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5933730?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria N Garcia-Casal
Juan P Peña-Rosas
Eloisa Urrechaga
Jesus F Escanero
Junsheng Huo
Ricardo X Martinez
Lucero Lopez-Perez
spellingShingle Maria N Garcia-Casal
Juan P Peña-Rosas
Eloisa Urrechaga
Jesus F Escanero
Junsheng Huo
Ricardo X Martinez
Lucero Lopez-Perez
Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Maria N Garcia-Casal
Juan P Peña-Rosas
Eloisa Urrechaga
Jesus F Escanero
Junsheng Huo
Ricardo X Martinez
Lucero Lopez-Perez
author_sort Maria N Garcia-Casal
title Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_short Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_sort performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description BACKGROUND:Different laboratory methods are used to quantify ferritin concentrations as a marker of iron status. A systematic review was undertaken to assess the accuracy and comparability of the most used methods for ferritin detection. METHODS AND FINDINGS:National and regional databases were searched for prospective, retrospective, sectional, longitudinal and case-control studies containing the characteristics and performance of at least one method for serum/plasma ferritin determinations in humans published to date. The analysis included the comparison between at least 2 methods detailing: sensitivity, precision, accuracy, predictive values, inter-methods adjustment, and use of international reference materials. Pooled method performance was analyzed for each method and across methods. OUTCOMES:Search strategy identified 11893 records. After de-duplication and screening 252 studies were assessed, including 187 studies in the qualitative analysis and 148 in the meta-analysis. The most used methods included radiometric, nonradiometric and agglutination assays. The overall within-run imprecision for the most reported ferritin methods was 6.2±3.4% (CI 5.69-6.70%; n = 171), between-run imprecision 8.9±8.7% (CI 7.44-10.35%; n = 136), and recovery rate 95.6% (CI 91.5-99.7%; n = 94). The pooled regression coefficient was 0.985 among all methods analyzed, and 0.984 when comparing nonradiometric and radiometric methods, without statistical differences in ferritin concentration ranging from 2.3 to 1454 μμg/L. CONCLUSION:The laboratory methods most used to determine ferritin concentrations have comparable accuracy and performance. Registered in PROSPERO CRD42016036222.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5933730?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT mariangarciacasal performanceandcomparabilityoflaboratorymethodsformeasuringferritinconcentrationsinhumanserumorplasmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT juanppenarosas performanceandcomparabilityoflaboratorymethodsformeasuringferritinconcentrationsinhumanserumorplasmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT eloisaurrechaga performanceandcomparabilityoflaboratorymethodsformeasuringferritinconcentrationsinhumanserumorplasmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jesusfescanero performanceandcomparabilityoflaboratorymethodsformeasuringferritinconcentrationsinhumanserumorplasmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT junshenghuo performanceandcomparabilityoflaboratorymethodsformeasuringferritinconcentrationsinhumanserumorplasmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ricardoxmartinez performanceandcomparabilityoflaboratorymethodsformeasuringferritinconcentrationsinhumanserumorplasmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lucerolopezperez performanceandcomparabilityoflaboratorymethodsformeasuringferritinconcentrationsinhumanserumorplasmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1725096637131390976