Necessity of Standard Classification of Occupation by Researches

Dear Editor We read with interest the recent original article by Esmailnasab and his colleagues (1) discussing the issue of influencing factors on type 2 diabetes in Sanandajd. The authors are to be congratulated for conducting such an important topic both for healthcare providers and researche...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B Moghimi Dehkordi, A Safaee
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2011-12-01
Series:مجله اپیدمیولوژی ایران
Online Access:http://irje.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-44&slc_lang=en&sid=1
id doaj-79d73815387146a997a56306a2dbb0bb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-79d73815387146a997a56306a2dbb0bb2021-09-02T17:22:45ZfasTehran University of Medical Sciencesمجله اپیدمیولوژی ایران1735-74892228-75072011-12-01736566Necessity of Standard Classification of Occupation by ResearchesB Moghimi Dehkordi0A Safaee1 Dear Editor We read with interest the recent original article by Esmailnasab and his colleagues (1) discussing the issue of influencing factors on type 2 diabetes in Sanandajd. The authors are to be congratulated for conducting such an important topic both for healthcare providers and researchers. We have noticed that in that interesting paper the occupational status was classified unclearly into four categories as "housekeeper", "employee", "farmer and free job" and "unemployed" that the journals reviewers have been overlooked this easily. Since one of the main characteristic of occupation is making money, some groups such as "student" and "housekeeper" are excluded from this category. There are several international classifications for occupational status that can be used for national studies in Iran. These categorizations also called "social class" that considered to occupational exposure, amount of income and some other components. One of these classifications is presented by the International Labor Organization (ILO). A number of countries have localized this classification and many countries have used it without changes (2). The latest revised classification (ISCO) has been revealed 11 occupational groups (major group) provides the following (3): 1- Legislators, senior officials and managers, 2- Professionals, 3- Technicians and associate professionals, 4- Clerks, 5- Service workers and shop and market sales workers, 6- Skilled agricultural and fishery workers, 7- Craft and related trade workers, 8- Plant and machine operators and assemblers, 9- Elementary occupations, 11- Armed forces. It seems that with modification of such classifications, we could obtain a national standard categorization for occupation and then would be able to better understanding the role of occupation in development of disease and health problems. http://irje.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-44&slc_lang=en&sid=1
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author B Moghimi Dehkordi
A Safaee
spellingShingle B Moghimi Dehkordi
A Safaee
Necessity of Standard Classification of Occupation by Researches
مجله اپیدمیولوژی ایران
author_facet B Moghimi Dehkordi
A Safaee
author_sort B Moghimi Dehkordi
title Necessity of Standard Classification of Occupation by Researches
title_short Necessity of Standard Classification of Occupation by Researches
title_full Necessity of Standard Classification of Occupation by Researches
title_fullStr Necessity of Standard Classification of Occupation by Researches
title_full_unstemmed Necessity of Standard Classification of Occupation by Researches
title_sort necessity of standard classification of occupation by researches
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series مجله اپیدمیولوژی ایران
issn 1735-7489
2228-7507
publishDate 2011-12-01
description Dear Editor We read with interest the recent original article by Esmailnasab and his colleagues (1) discussing the issue of influencing factors on type 2 diabetes in Sanandajd. The authors are to be congratulated for conducting such an important topic both for healthcare providers and researchers. We have noticed that in that interesting paper the occupational status was classified unclearly into four categories as "housekeeper", "employee", "farmer and free job" and "unemployed" that the journals reviewers have been overlooked this easily. Since one of the main characteristic of occupation is making money, some groups such as "student" and "housekeeper" are excluded from this category. There are several international classifications for occupational status that can be used for national studies in Iran. These categorizations also called "social class" that considered to occupational exposure, amount of income and some other components. One of these classifications is presented by the International Labor Organization (ILO). A number of countries have localized this classification and many countries have used it without changes (2). The latest revised classification (ISCO) has been revealed 11 occupational groups (major group) provides the following (3): 1- Legislators, senior officials and managers, 2- Professionals, 3- Technicians and associate professionals, 4- Clerks, 5- Service workers and shop and market sales workers, 6- Skilled agricultural and fishery workers, 7- Craft and related trade workers, 8- Plant and machine operators and assemblers, 9- Elementary occupations, 11- Armed forces. It seems that with modification of such classifications, we could obtain a national standard categorization for occupation and then would be able to better understanding the role of occupation in development of disease and health problems.
url http://irje.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-44&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT bmoghimidehkordi necessityofstandardclassificationofoccupationbyresearches
AT asafaee necessityofstandardclassificationofoccupationbyresearches
_version_ 1721172353991311360