Developmental constraints on vertebrate genome evolution.

Constraints in embryonic development are thought to bias the direction of evolution by making some changes less likely, and others more likely, depending on their consequences on ontogeny. Here, we characterize the constraints acting on genome evolution in vertebrates. We used gene expression data f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julien Roux, Marc Robinson-Rechavi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2008-12-01
Series:PLoS Genetics
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2600815?pdf=render
id doaj-79ce7e9e09bf46fa9c2284621edc6fb7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-79ce7e9e09bf46fa9c2284621edc6fb72020-11-25T02:29:18ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Genetics1553-73901553-74042008-12-01412e100031110.1371/journal.pgen.1000311Developmental constraints on vertebrate genome evolution.Julien RouxMarc Robinson-RechaviConstraints in embryonic development are thought to bias the direction of evolution by making some changes less likely, and others more likely, depending on their consequences on ontogeny. Here, we characterize the constraints acting on genome evolution in vertebrates. We used gene expression data from two vertebrates: zebrafish, using a microarray experiment spanning 14 stages of development, and mouse, using EST counts for 26 stages of development. We show that, in both species, genes expressed early in development (1) have a more dramatic effect of knock-out or mutation and (2) are more likely to revert to single copy after whole genome duplication, relative to genes expressed late. This supports high constraints on early stages of vertebrate development, making them less open to innovations (gene gain or gene loss). Results are robust to different sources of data -- gene expression from microarrays, ESTs, or in situ hybridizations; and mutants from directed KO, transgenic insertions, point mutations, or morpholinos. We determine the pattern of these constraints, which differs from the model used to describe vertebrate morphological conservation ("hourglass" model). While morphological constraints reach a maximum at mid-development (the "phylotypic" stage), genomic constraints appear to decrease in a monotonous manner over developmental time.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2600815?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julien Roux
Marc Robinson-Rechavi
spellingShingle Julien Roux
Marc Robinson-Rechavi
Developmental constraints on vertebrate genome evolution.
PLoS Genetics
author_facet Julien Roux
Marc Robinson-Rechavi
author_sort Julien Roux
title Developmental constraints on vertebrate genome evolution.
title_short Developmental constraints on vertebrate genome evolution.
title_full Developmental constraints on vertebrate genome evolution.
title_fullStr Developmental constraints on vertebrate genome evolution.
title_full_unstemmed Developmental constraints on vertebrate genome evolution.
title_sort developmental constraints on vertebrate genome evolution.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Genetics
issn 1553-7390
1553-7404
publishDate 2008-12-01
description Constraints in embryonic development are thought to bias the direction of evolution by making some changes less likely, and others more likely, depending on their consequences on ontogeny. Here, we characterize the constraints acting on genome evolution in vertebrates. We used gene expression data from two vertebrates: zebrafish, using a microarray experiment spanning 14 stages of development, and mouse, using EST counts for 26 stages of development. We show that, in both species, genes expressed early in development (1) have a more dramatic effect of knock-out or mutation and (2) are more likely to revert to single copy after whole genome duplication, relative to genes expressed late. This supports high constraints on early stages of vertebrate development, making them less open to innovations (gene gain or gene loss). Results are robust to different sources of data -- gene expression from microarrays, ESTs, or in situ hybridizations; and mutants from directed KO, transgenic insertions, point mutations, or morpholinos. We determine the pattern of these constraints, which differs from the model used to describe vertebrate morphological conservation ("hourglass" model). While morphological constraints reach a maximum at mid-development (the "phylotypic" stage), genomic constraints appear to decrease in a monotonous manner over developmental time.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2600815?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT julienroux developmentalconstraintsonvertebrategenomeevolution
AT marcrobinsonrechavi developmentalconstraintsonvertebrategenomeevolution
_version_ 1724833909868331008