Comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loads
ABSTRACT: This paper presents a numerical analysis of slamming and whipping using a fully coupled hydroelastic model. The coupled model uses a 3-D Rankine panel method, a 1-D or 3-D finite element method, and a 2-D Generalized Wagner Model (GWM), which are strongly coupled in time domain. First, the...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2014-12-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2092678216302722 |
id |
doaj-79c9114a8b8a4874b553e6c03d0aedbd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-79c9114a8b8a4874b553e6c03d0aedbd2020-11-24T21:47:17ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering2092-67822014-12-016410641081Comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loadsJung-Hyun Kim0Yonghwan Kim1Alexander Korobkin2Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaSeoul National University, Seoul, Korea; Corresponding authorSchool of Mathematics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UKABSTRACT: This paper presents a numerical analysis of slamming and whipping using a fully coupled hydroelastic model. The coupled model uses a 3-D Rankine panel method, a 1-D or 3-D finite element method, and a 2-D Generalized Wagner Model (GWM), which are strongly coupled in time domain. First, the GWM is validated against results of a free drop test of wedges. Second, the fully coupled method is validated against model test results for a 10,000 twenty-foot equivalent unit (TEU) containership. Slamming pressures and whipping responses to regular waves are compared. A spatial distribution of local slamming forces is measured using 14 force sensors in the model test, and it is compared with the integration of the pressure distribution by the computation. Furthermore, the pressure is decomposed into the added mass, impact, and hydrostatic components, in the computational results. The validity and characteristics of the numerical model are discussed. KEY WORDS: Slamming, Whipping, Hydroelasticity, Rankine panel method, Generalized wagner model (GWM)http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2092678216302722 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jung-Hyun Kim Yonghwan Kim Alexander Korobkin |
spellingShingle |
Jung-Hyun Kim Yonghwan Kim Alexander Korobkin Comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loads International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering |
author_facet |
Jung-Hyun Kim Yonghwan Kim Alexander Korobkin |
author_sort |
Jung-Hyun Kim |
title |
Comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loads |
title_short |
Comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loads |
title_full |
Comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loads |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loads |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loads |
title_sort |
comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loads |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering |
issn |
2092-6782 |
publishDate |
2014-12-01 |
description |
ABSTRACT: This paper presents a numerical analysis of slamming and whipping using a fully coupled hydroelastic model. The coupled model uses a 3-D Rankine panel method, a 1-D or 3-D finite element method, and a 2-D Generalized Wagner Model (GWM), which are strongly coupled in time domain. First, the GWM is validated against results of a free drop test of wedges. Second, the fully coupled method is validated against model test results for a 10,000 twenty-foot equivalent unit (TEU) containership. Slamming pressures and whipping responses to regular waves are compared. A spatial distribution of local slamming forces is measured using 14 force sensors in the model test, and it is compared with the integration of the pressure distribution by the computation. Furthermore, the pressure is decomposed into the added mass, impact, and hydrostatic components, in the computational results. The validity and characteristics of the numerical model are discussed. KEY WORDS: Slamming, Whipping, Hydroelasticity, Rankine panel method, Generalized wagner model (GWM) |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2092678216302722 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT junghyunkim comparisonoffullycoupledhydroelasticcomputationandsegmentedmodeltestresultsforslammingandwhippingloads AT yonghwankim comparisonoffullycoupledhydroelasticcomputationandsegmentedmodeltestresultsforslammingandwhippingloads AT alexanderkorobkin comparisonoffullycoupledhydroelasticcomputationandsegmentedmodeltestresultsforslammingandwhippingloads |
_version_ |
1725897989902303232 |