Comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loads

ABSTRACT: This paper presents a numerical analysis of slamming and whipping using a fully coupled hydroelastic model. The coupled model uses a 3-D Rankine panel method, a 1-D or 3-D finite element method, and a 2-D Generalized Wagner Model (GWM), which are strongly coupled in time domain. First, the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jung-Hyun Kim, Yonghwan Kim, Alexander Korobkin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2014-12-01
Series:International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2092678216302722
id doaj-79c9114a8b8a4874b553e6c03d0aedbd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-79c9114a8b8a4874b553e6c03d0aedbd2020-11-24T21:47:17ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering2092-67822014-12-016410641081Comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loadsJung-Hyun Kim0Yonghwan Kim1Alexander Korobkin2Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaSeoul National University, Seoul, Korea; Corresponding authorSchool of Mathematics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UKABSTRACT: This paper presents a numerical analysis of slamming and whipping using a fully coupled hydroelastic model. The coupled model uses a 3-D Rankine panel method, a 1-D or 3-D finite element method, and a 2-D Generalized Wagner Model (GWM), which are strongly coupled in time domain. First, the GWM is validated against results of a free drop test of wedges. Second, the fully coupled method is validated against model test results for a 10,000 twenty-foot equivalent unit (TEU) containership. Slamming pressures and whipping responses to regular waves are compared. A spatial distribution of local slamming forces is measured using 14 force sensors in the model test, and it is compared with the integration of the pressure distribution by the computation. Furthermore, the pressure is decomposed into the added mass, impact, and hydrostatic components, in the computational results. The validity and characteristics of the numerical model are discussed. KEY WORDS: Slamming, Whipping, Hydroelasticity, Rankine panel method, Generalized wagner model (GWM)http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2092678216302722
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jung-Hyun Kim
Yonghwan Kim
Alexander Korobkin
spellingShingle Jung-Hyun Kim
Yonghwan Kim
Alexander Korobkin
Comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loads
International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering
author_facet Jung-Hyun Kim
Yonghwan Kim
Alexander Korobkin
author_sort Jung-Hyun Kim
title Comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loads
title_short Comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loads
title_full Comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loads
title_fullStr Comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loads
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loads
title_sort comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loads
publisher Elsevier
series International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering
issn 2092-6782
publishDate 2014-12-01
description ABSTRACT: This paper presents a numerical analysis of slamming and whipping using a fully coupled hydroelastic model. The coupled model uses a 3-D Rankine panel method, a 1-D or 3-D finite element method, and a 2-D Generalized Wagner Model (GWM), which are strongly coupled in time domain. First, the GWM is validated against results of a free drop test of wedges. Second, the fully coupled method is validated against model test results for a 10,000 twenty-foot equivalent unit (TEU) containership. Slamming pressures and whipping responses to regular waves are compared. A spatial distribution of local slamming forces is measured using 14 force sensors in the model test, and it is compared with the integration of the pressure distribution by the computation. Furthermore, the pressure is decomposed into the added mass, impact, and hydrostatic components, in the computational results. The validity and characteristics of the numerical model are discussed. KEY WORDS: Slamming, Whipping, Hydroelasticity, Rankine panel method, Generalized wagner model (GWM)
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2092678216302722
work_keys_str_mv AT junghyunkim comparisonoffullycoupledhydroelasticcomputationandsegmentedmodeltestresultsforslammingandwhippingloads
AT yonghwankim comparisonoffullycoupledhydroelasticcomputationandsegmentedmodeltestresultsforslammingandwhippingloads
AT alexanderkorobkin comparisonoffullycoupledhydroelasticcomputationandsegmentedmodeltestresultsforslammingandwhippingloads
_version_ 1725897989902303232