Comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers.
The potential of probiotics to manipulate the intestinal microbial ecosystem toward commensal bacteria growth offers great opportunity for enhancing health and performance in poultry. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of five probiotic-based formulations in modulating cecal microbiota in bro...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225871 |
id |
doaj-79c745b38baf453c8e557433ddabcd35 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-79c745b38baf453c8e557433ddabcd352021-03-03T21:55:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01155e022587110.1371/journal.pone.0225871Comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers.Denise R RodriguesWhitney BriggsAudrey DuffKaylin ChasserRaj MurugesanChasity PenderShelby RamirezLuis ValenzuelaLisa R BielkeThe potential of probiotics to manipulate the intestinal microbial ecosystem toward commensal bacteria growth offers great opportunity for enhancing health and performance in poultry. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of five probiotic-based formulations in modulating cecal microbiota in broilers at 21 and 42 days of age. Probiotics investigated included a synbiotic (SYNBIO), a yeast (YEAST), and three single-strain formulations of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (SINGLE1), B. subtilis (SINGLE2) and B. licheniformis (SINGLE3). Alpha-diversity analyses showed that cecal microbiota of SINGLE1, SINGLE2, and YEAST had low diversity compared to the control diet with no feed additive (CON) at 21d. At the same age, weighted Unifrac distance measure showed significant differences between samples from SYNBIO and CON (P = 0.02). However, by analyzing principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) with unweighted Unifrac, there was no evidence of clustering between CON and probiotic treatments. By 42d, there were no differences in alpha or beta-diversity in the microbiota of probiotic treatments compared to CON. Similarly, taxonomic microbial profiling did not show major changes in cecal microbial taxa. In conclusion, not all probiotic-based formulations tested had a core benefit on the modulation of microbiota. However, based on the quantitative beta diversity results, SYNBIO greatly influenced the cecal microbial community structure attributable to transient variations in relative taxon abundance.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225871 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Denise R Rodrigues Whitney Briggs Audrey Duff Kaylin Chasser Raj Murugesan Chasity Pender Shelby Ramirez Luis Valenzuela Lisa R Bielke |
spellingShingle |
Denise R Rodrigues Whitney Briggs Audrey Duff Kaylin Chasser Raj Murugesan Chasity Pender Shelby Ramirez Luis Valenzuela Lisa R Bielke Comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Denise R Rodrigues Whitney Briggs Audrey Duff Kaylin Chasser Raj Murugesan Chasity Pender Shelby Ramirez Luis Valenzuela Lisa R Bielke |
author_sort |
Denise R Rodrigues |
title |
Comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers. |
title_short |
Comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers. |
title_full |
Comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers. |
title_fullStr |
Comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers. |
title_sort |
comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
The potential of probiotics to manipulate the intestinal microbial ecosystem toward commensal bacteria growth offers great opportunity for enhancing health and performance in poultry. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of five probiotic-based formulations in modulating cecal microbiota in broilers at 21 and 42 days of age. Probiotics investigated included a synbiotic (SYNBIO), a yeast (YEAST), and three single-strain formulations of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (SINGLE1), B. subtilis (SINGLE2) and B. licheniformis (SINGLE3). Alpha-diversity analyses showed that cecal microbiota of SINGLE1, SINGLE2, and YEAST had low diversity compared to the control diet with no feed additive (CON) at 21d. At the same age, weighted Unifrac distance measure showed significant differences between samples from SYNBIO and CON (P = 0.02). However, by analyzing principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) with unweighted Unifrac, there was no evidence of clustering between CON and probiotic treatments. By 42d, there were no differences in alpha or beta-diversity in the microbiota of probiotic treatments compared to CON. Similarly, taxonomic microbial profiling did not show major changes in cecal microbial taxa. In conclusion, not all probiotic-based formulations tested had a core benefit on the modulation of microbiota. However, based on the quantitative beta diversity results, SYNBIO greatly influenced the cecal microbial community structure attributable to transient variations in relative taxon abundance. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225871 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT deniserrodrigues comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers AT whitneybriggs comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers AT audreyduff comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers AT kaylinchasser comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers AT rajmurugesan comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers AT chasitypender comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers AT shelbyramirez comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers AT luisvalenzuela comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers AT lisarbielke comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers |
_version_ |
1714814324456816640 |