Comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers.

The potential of probiotics to manipulate the intestinal microbial ecosystem toward commensal bacteria growth offers great opportunity for enhancing health and performance in poultry. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of five probiotic-based formulations in modulating cecal microbiota in bro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Denise R Rodrigues, Whitney Briggs, Audrey Duff, Kaylin Chasser, Raj Murugesan, Chasity Pender, Shelby Ramirez, Luis Valenzuela, Lisa R Bielke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225871
id doaj-79c745b38baf453c8e557433ddabcd35
record_format Article
spelling doaj-79c745b38baf453c8e557433ddabcd352021-03-03T21:55:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01155e022587110.1371/journal.pone.0225871Comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers.Denise R RodriguesWhitney BriggsAudrey DuffKaylin ChasserRaj MurugesanChasity PenderShelby RamirezLuis ValenzuelaLisa R BielkeThe potential of probiotics to manipulate the intestinal microbial ecosystem toward commensal bacteria growth offers great opportunity for enhancing health and performance in poultry. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of five probiotic-based formulations in modulating cecal microbiota in broilers at 21 and 42 days of age. Probiotics investigated included a synbiotic (SYNBIO), a yeast (YEAST), and three single-strain formulations of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (SINGLE1), B. subtilis (SINGLE2) and B. licheniformis (SINGLE3). Alpha-diversity analyses showed that cecal microbiota of SINGLE1, SINGLE2, and YEAST had low diversity compared to the control diet with no feed additive (CON) at 21d. At the same age, weighted Unifrac distance measure showed significant differences between samples from SYNBIO and CON (P = 0.02). However, by analyzing principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) with unweighted Unifrac, there was no evidence of clustering between CON and probiotic treatments. By 42d, there were no differences in alpha or beta-diversity in the microbiota of probiotic treatments compared to CON. Similarly, taxonomic microbial profiling did not show major changes in cecal microbial taxa. In conclusion, not all probiotic-based formulations tested had a core benefit on the modulation of microbiota. However, based on the quantitative beta diversity results, SYNBIO greatly influenced the cecal microbial community structure attributable to transient variations in relative taxon abundance.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225871
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Denise R Rodrigues
Whitney Briggs
Audrey Duff
Kaylin Chasser
Raj Murugesan
Chasity Pender
Shelby Ramirez
Luis Valenzuela
Lisa R Bielke
spellingShingle Denise R Rodrigues
Whitney Briggs
Audrey Duff
Kaylin Chasser
Raj Murugesan
Chasity Pender
Shelby Ramirez
Luis Valenzuela
Lisa R Bielke
Comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Denise R Rodrigues
Whitney Briggs
Audrey Duff
Kaylin Chasser
Raj Murugesan
Chasity Pender
Shelby Ramirez
Luis Valenzuela
Lisa R Bielke
author_sort Denise R Rodrigues
title Comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers.
title_short Comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers.
title_full Comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers.
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers.
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers.
title_sort comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The potential of probiotics to manipulate the intestinal microbial ecosystem toward commensal bacteria growth offers great opportunity for enhancing health and performance in poultry. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of five probiotic-based formulations in modulating cecal microbiota in broilers at 21 and 42 days of age. Probiotics investigated included a synbiotic (SYNBIO), a yeast (YEAST), and three single-strain formulations of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (SINGLE1), B. subtilis (SINGLE2) and B. licheniformis (SINGLE3). Alpha-diversity analyses showed that cecal microbiota of SINGLE1, SINGLE2, and YEAST had low diversity compared to the control diet with no feed additive (CON) at 21d. At the same age, weighted Unifrac distance measure showed significant differences between samples from SYNBIO and CON (P = 0.02). However, by analyzing principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) with unweighted Unifrac, there was no evidence of clustering between CON and probiotic treatments. By 42d, there were no differences in alpha or beta-diversity in the microbiota of probiotic treatments compared to CON. Similarly, taxonomic microbial profiling did not show major changes in cecal microbial taxa. In conclusion, not all probiotic-based formulations tested had a core benefit on the modulation of microbiota. However, based on the quantitative beta diversity results, SYNBIO greatly influenced the cecal microbial community structure attributable to transient variations in relative taxon abundance.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225871
work_keys_str_mv AT deniserrodrigues comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers
AT whitneybriggs comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers
AT audreyduff comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers
AT kaylinchasser comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers
AT rajmurugesan comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers
AT chasitypender comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers
AT shelbyramirez comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers
AT luisvalenzuela comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers
AT lisarbielke comparativeeffectivenessofprobioticbasedformulationsoncecalmicrobiotamodulationinbroilers
_version_ 1714814324456816640