Framing Climate Services: Logics, Actors, and Implications for Policies and Projects

This paper explores how climate services are framed in the literature and possible implications for climate services’ policies and projects. By critically exploring the frames around climate services, the wider objective is to encourage more reflexive and responsible research in the field, particula...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marine Lugen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/11/10/1047
id doaj-79a2ac1066124585a9d507856bc34e0d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-79a2ac1066124585a9d507856bc34e0d2020-11-25T03:27:42ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332020-09-01111047104710.3390/atmos11101047Framing Climate Services: Logics, Actors, and Implications for Policies and ProjectsMarine Lugen0Centre d’Etudes du Développement Durable, Université libre de Bruxelles, ULB C130/03 Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, 1050 Brussels, BelgiumThis paper explores how climate services are framed in the literature and possible implications for climate services’ policies and projects. By critically exploring the frames around climate services, the wider objective is to encourage more reflexive and responsible research in the field, particularly given the huge challenge that climate change represents. By using a framing analysis based on an extensive literature review, five dominant frames were identified. Climate services are mainly framed (1) as a technological innovation, (2) as a market, (3) as an interface between users and producers, (4) as a risk management tool, and (5) from an ethical angle. The predominant frames influence how we think about climate services, shared assumptions, and the way in which policies and projects are designed. To prevent negative effects of climate services on the ground, such as inequalities, the main recommendations include establishing interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary dialogues between different communities of practice and players, increasing empirical and social science research to improve our understanding of this new field, and finally, re-thinking climate services in terms of adaptation rather than as the mere production of new information products.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/11/10/1047climate servicesclimate information servicesclimate change adaptationframing analysisdiscourse analysisclimate policy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marine Lugen
spellingShingle Marine Lugen
Framing Climate Services: Logics, Actors, and Implications for Policies and Projects
Atmosphere
climate services
climate information services
climate change adaptation
framing analysis
discourse analysis
climate policy
author_facet Marine Lugen
author_sort Marine Lugen
title Framing Climate Services: Logics, Actors, and Implications for Policies and Projects
title_short Framing Climate Services: Logics, Actors, and Implications for Policies and Projects
title_full Framing Climate Services: Logics, Actors, and Implications for Policies and Projects
title_fullStr Framing Climate Services: Logics, Actors, and Implications for Policies and Projects
title_full_unstemmed Framing Climate Services: Logics, Actors, and Implications for Policies and Projects
title_sort framing climate services: logics, actors, and implications for policies and projects
publisher MDPI AG
series Atmosphere
issn 2073-4433
publishDate 2020-09-01
description This paper explores how climate services are framed in the literature and possible implications for climate services’ policies and projects. By critically exploring the frames around climate services, the wider objective is to encourage more reflexive and responsible research in the field, particularly given the huge challenge that climate change represents. By using a framing analysis based on an extensive literature review, five dominant frames were identified. Climate services are mainly framed (1) as a technological innovation, (2) as a market, (3) as an interface between users and producers, (4) as a risk management tool, and (5) from an ethical angle. The predominant frames influence how we think about climate services, shared assumptions, and the way in which policies and projects are designed. To prevent negative effects of climate services on the ground, such as inequalities, the main recommendations include establishing interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary dialogues between different communities of practice and players, increasing empirical and social science research to improve our understanding of this new field, and finally, re-thinking climate services in terms of adaptation rather than as the mere production of new information products.
topic climate services
climate information services
climate change adaptation
framing analysis
discourse analysis
climate policy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/11/10/1047
work_keys_str_mv AT marinelugen framingclimateserviceslogicsactorsandimplicationsforpoliciesandprojects
_version_ 1724587550307254272