Axial and radial forces of cross-bridges depend on lattice spacing.

Nearly all mechanochemical models of the cross-bridge treat myosin as a simple linear spring arranged parallel to the contractile filaments. These single-spring models cannot account for the radial force that muscle generates (orthogonal to the long axis of the myofilaments) or the effects of change...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C David Williams, Michael Regnier, Thomas L Daniel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-12-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2996315?pdf=render
id doaj-79995336b5fa44129b55e13d1ae12931
record_format Article
spelling doaj-79995336b5fa44129b55e13d1ae129312020-11-24T21:50:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582010-12-01612e100101810.1371/journal.pcbi.1001018Axial and radial forces of cross-bridges depend on lattice spacing.C David WilliamsMichael RegnierThomas L DanielNearly all mechanochemical models of the cross-bridge treat myosin as a simple linear spring arranged parallel to the contractile filaments. These single-spring models cannot account for the radial force that muscle generates (orthogonal to the long axis of the myofilaments) or the effects of changes in filament lattice spacing. We describe a more complex myosin cross-bridge model that uses multiple springs to replicate myosin's force-generating power stroke and account for the effects of lattice spacing and radial force. The four springs which comprise this model (the 4sXB) correspond to the mechanically relevant portions of myosin's structure. As occurs in vivo, the 4sXB's state-transition kinetics and force-production dynamics vary with lattice spacing. Additionally, we describe a simpler two-spring cross-bridge (2sXB) model which produces results similar to those of the 4sXB model. Unlike the 4sXB model, the 2sXB model requires no iterative techniques, making it more computationally efficient. The rate at which both multi-spring cross-bridges bind and generate force decreases as lattice spacing grows. The axial force generated by each cross-bridge as it undergoes a power stroke increases as lattice spacing grows. The radial force that a cross-bridge produces as it undergoes a power stroke varies from expansive to compressive as lattice spacing increases. Importantly, these results mirror those for intact, contracting muscle force production.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2996315?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C David Williams
Michael Regnier
Thomas L Daniel
spellingShingle C David Williams
Michael Regnier
Thomas L Daniel
Axial and radial forces of cross-bridges depend on lattice spacing.
PLoS Computational Biology
author_facet C David Williams
Michael Regnier
Thomas L Daniel
author_sort C David Williams
title Axial and radial forces of cross-bridges depend on lattice spacing.
title_short Axial and radial forces of cross-bridges depend on lattice spacing.
title_full Axial and radial forces of cross-bridges depend on lattice spacing.
title_fullStr Axial and radial forces of cross-bridges depend on lattice spacing.
title_full_unstemmed Axial and radial forces of cross-bridges depend on lattice spacing.
title_sort axial and radial forces of cross-bridges depend on lattice spacing.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2010-12-01
description Nearly all mechanochemical models of the cross-bridge treat myosin as a simple linear spring arranged parallel to the contractile filaments. These single-spring models cannot account for the radial force that muscle generates (orthogonal to the long axis of the myofilaments) or the effects of changes in filament lattice spacing. We describe a more complex myosin cross-bridge model that uses multiple springs to replicate myosin's force-generating power stroke and account for the effects of lattice spacing and radial force. The four springs which comprise this model (the 4sXB) correspond to the mechanically relevant portions of myosin's structure. As occurs in vivo, the 4sXB's state-transition kinetics and force-production dynamics vary with lattice spacing. Additionally, we describe a simpler two-spring cross-bridge (2sXB) model which produces results similar to those of the 4sXB model. Unlike the 4sXB model, the 2sXB model requires no iterative techniques, making it more computationally efficient. The rate at which both multi-spring cross-bridges bind and generate force decreases as lattice spacing grows. The axial force generated by each cross-bridge as it undergoes a power stroke increases as lattice spacing grows. The radial force that a cross-bridge produces as it undergoes a power stroke varies from expansive to compressive as lattice spacing increases. Importantly, these results mirror those for intact, contracting muscle force production.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2996315?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT cdavidwilliams axialandradialforcesofcrossbridgesdependonlatticespacing
AT michaelregnier axialandradialforcesofcrossbridgesdependonlatticespacing
AT thomasldaniel axialandradialforcesofcrossbridgesdependonlatticespacing
_version_ 1725882664470183936