A Comparison of Reproducibility of Inductively Coupled Spectrometric Techniques in Soil Metal Analyses

Precise estimation of metals in samples remains a challenge as a result of analytical biases and errors, which occur at sample collection, preparation, and measurement stages. A poor understanding of the nature and occurrence of these errors further aggravates this challenge. This study aimed at com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joan Nyika, Ednah Onyari, Megersa Olumana Dinka, Shivani Bhardwaj Mishra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-08-01
Series:Air, Soil and Water Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1178622119869002
id doaj-799248d923344f3b8dc08c9af43da72e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-799248d923344f3b8dc08c9af43da72e2020-11-25T03:30:27ZengSAGE PublishingAir, Soil and Water Research1178-62212019-08-011210.1177/1178622119869002A Comparison of Reproducibility of Inductively Coupled Spectrometric Techniques in Soil Metal AnalysesJoan Nyika0Ednah Onyari1Megersa Olumana Dinka2Shivani Bhardwaj Mishra3Department of Civil and Chemical Engineering, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, South AfricaDepartment of Civil and Chemical Engineering, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, South AfricaDepartment of Civil Engineering Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South AfricaNanotechnology and Water Sustainability Research Unit, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, South AfricaPrecise estimation of metals in samples remains a challenge as a result of analytical biases and errors, which occur at sample collection, preparation, and measurement stages. A poor understanding of the nature and occurrence of these errors further aggravates this challenge. This study aimed at comparing the effectiveness of inductively coupled plasma (ICP) mass spectrometry (MS) and optical emission spectrometry (OES) techniques in quantifying metals from contaminated soils of Roundhill landfill vicinity. Using statistical tools, the study evaluated biases of the 2 methods. High coefficients of variation were realized for V, Cr, and Pb concentrations varied at various sampling sites. Concentrations of elements obtained using the 2 methods had no significant differences using t -test analysis. Definitive agreement for the 2 methods was observed for V, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Sr, and Pb concentrations, whereas the concentrations of Mg, Ca, Ti, Mn, and Fe showed some deviations in their regression lines. Spectral, systematic, memory, and carry over errors could be attributable to these deviations. The errors promote chelation and adsorption of ions in samples to form insoluble compounds that cannot be quantified. Overall, ICP-MS had greater sensitivity than ICP-OES in trace elements analysis compared with major elements.https://doi.org/10.1177/1178622119869002
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joan Nyika
Ednah Onyari
Megersa Olumana Dinka
Shivani Bhardwaj Mishra
spellingShingle Joan Nyika
Ednah Onyari
Megersa Olumana Dinka
Shivani Bhardwaj Mishra
A Comparison of Reproducibility of Inductively Coupled Spectrometric Techniques in Soil Metal Analyses
Air, Soil and Water Research
author_facet Joan Nyika
Ednah Onyari
Megersa Olumana Dinka
Shivani Bhardwaj Mishra
author_sort Joan Nyika
title A Comparison of Reproducibility of Inductively Coupled Spectrometric Techniques in Soil Metal Analyses
title_short A Comparison of Reproducibility of Inductively Coupled Spectrometric Techniques in Soil Metal Analyses
title_full A Comparison of Reproducibility of Inductively Coupled Spectrometric Techniques in Soil Metal Analyses
title_fullStr A Comparison of Reproducibility of Inductively Coupled Spectrometric Techniques in Soil Metal Analyses
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Reproducibility of Inductively Coupled Spectrometric Techniques in Soil Metal Analyses
title_sort comparison of reproducibility of inductively coupled spectrometric techniques in soil metal analyses
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Air, Soil and Water Research
issn 1178-6221
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Precise estimation of metals in samples remains a challenge as a result of analytical biases and errors, which occur at sample collection, preparation, and measurement stages. A poor understanding of the nature and occurrence of these errors further aggravates this challenge. This study aimed at comparing the effectiveness of inductively coupled plasma (ICP) mass spectrometry (MS) and optical emission spectrometry (OES) techniques in quantifying metals from contaminated soils of Roundhill landfill vicinity. Using statistical tools, the study evaluated biases of the 2 methods. High coefficients of variation were realized for V, Cr, and Pb concentrations varied at various sampling sites. Concentrations of elements obtained using the 2 methods had no significant differences using t -test analysis. Definitive agreement for the 2 methods was observed for V, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Sr, and Pb concentrations, whereas the concentrations of Mg, Ca, Ti, Mn, and Fe showed some deviations in their regression lines. Spectral, systematic, memory, and carry over errors could be attributable to these deviations. The errors promote chelation and adsorption of ions in samples to form insoluble compounds that cannot be quantified. Overall, ICP-MS had greater sensitivity than ICP-OES in trace elements analysis compared with major elements.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1178622119869002
work_keys_str_mv AT joannyika acomparisonofreproducibilityofinductivelycoupledspectrometrictechniquesinsoilmetalanalyses
AT ednahonyari acomparisonofreproducibilityofinductivelycoupledspectrometrictechniquesinsoilmetalanalyses
AT megersaolumanadinka acomparisonofreproducibilityofinductivelycoupledspectrometrictechniquesinsoilmetalanalyses
AT shivanibhardwajmishra acomparisonofreproducibilityofinductivelycoupledspectrometrictechniquesinsoilmetalanalyses
AT joannyika comparisonofreproducibilityofinductivelycoupledspectrometrictechniquesinsoilmetalanalyses
AT ednahonyari comparisonofreproducibilityofinductivelycoupledspectrometrictechniquesinsoilmetalanalyses
AT megersaolumanadinka comparisonofreproducibilityofinductivelycoupledspectrometrictechniquesinsoilmetalanalyses
AT shivanibhardwajmishra comparisonofreproducibilityofinductivelycoupledspectrometrictechniquesinsoilmetalanalyses
_version_ 1724575487369412608