Endothelial dysfunction a significant marker of adverse clinical outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation after cardioembolic stroke

Aim. To study the prognostic significance of endothelial dysfunction (ED) markers in the development of adverse clinical outcome (death) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) within a year after cardioembolic stroke. Materials and methods. 260 patients with newly diagnosed (nAF), paroxysmal, per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I A Zolotovskaya, I L Davydkin
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: "Consilium Medicum" Publishing house 2019-01-01
Series:Терапевтический архив
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ter-arkhiv.ru/0040-3660/article/viewFile/32909/pdf
id doaj-7989d9b017ea41efbd464b014fb4fca0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7989d9b017ea41efbd464b014fb4fca02020-11-25T03:23:04Zrus"Consilium Medicum" Publishing houseТерапевтический архив0040-36602309-53422019-01-01911535910.26442/00403660.2019.01.00003029660Endothelial dysfunction a significant marker of adverse clinical outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation after cardioembolic strokeI A Zolotovskaya0I L Davydkin1Samara State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationSamara State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationAim. To study the prognostic significance of endothelial dysfunction (ED) markers in the development of adverse clinical outcome (death) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) within a year after cardioembolic stroke. Materials and methods. 260 patients with newly diagnosed (nAF), paroxysmal, persistent and permanent forms of AF who underwent stroke were included. Duration of observation-12 months. V1 - the beginning of the study: V2 - 180 (±5) days and V3 - 360 (±5) evaluated the level of von Willebrand factor (fW), antithrombin III (AT III) and plasminogen. Results and discussion. During the year of follow-up, patients with AF who underwent and had a high mortality rate. During the whole period 38 (14.6%) patients died, 15 (23.0%) - in the group with nAF, 6 (9.2%) - in the group with paroxysmal AF, 7 (10.8%) - in the group with persistent AF and 10 (15.4%) - in the group with permanent AF. After a year of follow-up, the level of fW in patients with nAF was higher than in patients of all groups, and statistically significant in patients with paroxysmal and persistent forms of AF. At III was important in the group of patients with nAF and with a constant form of AF, in the same groups there was no statistically significant increase in a year of follow-up. It was found that in survivors with nAF at III (73.54±8.67%) higher (p=0.002) compared with the dead (65.77±6.01%). In the group of patients with paroxysmal AF in survivors of III (77.75±10.15%) higher (p=0.031) compared with the dead (69.25±5.80%). In patients with persistent AF, the survivors of III (76.57±9.09%) were higher (p=0.002) compared to the dead (65.60±2.21%). Taking into account the results of the analysis of the dynamics of ed markers, it can be assumed that AT III is the most accurate prognostic marker for the studied cohort of patients. Conclusion. Detection and correction of ED in AF in patients within a year after stroke can optimize the tactics of management of patients and improve the prognosis of the diseas.https://ter-arkhiv.ru/0040-3660/article/viewFile/32909/pdfatrial fibrillationcardioembolic strokeendothelial dysfunctionmortalitydivaza
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author I A Zolotovskaya
I L Davydkin
spellingShingle I A Zolotovskaya
I L Davydkin
Endothelial dysfunction a significant marker of adverse clinical outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation after cardioembolic stroke
Терапевтический архив
atrial fibrillation
cardioembolic stroke
endothelial dysfunction
mortality
divaza
author_facet I A Zolotovskaya
I L Davydkin
author_sort I A Zolotovskaya
title Endothelial dysfunction a significant marker of adverse clinical outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation after cardioembolic stroke
title_short Endothelial dysfunction a significant marker of adverse clinical outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation after cardioembolic stroke
title_full Endothelial dysfunction a significant marker of adverse clinical outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation after cardioembolic stroke
title_fullStr Endothelial dysfunction a significant marker of adverse clinical outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation after cardioembolic stroke
title_full_unstemmed Endothelial dysfunction a significant marker of adverse clinical outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation after cardioembolic stroke
title_sort endothelial dysfunction a significant marker of adverse clinical outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation after cardioembolic stroke
publisher "Consilium Medicum" Publishing house
series Терапевтический архив
issn 0040-3660
2309-5342
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Aim. To study the prognostic significance of endothelial dysfunction (ED) markers in the development of adverse clinical outcome (death) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) within a year after cardioembolic stroke. Materials and methods. 260 patients with newly diagnosed (nAF), paroxysmal, persistent and permanent forms of AF who underwent stroke were included. Duration of observation-12 months. V1 - the beginning of the study: V2 - 180 (±5) days and V3 - 360 (±5) evaluated the level of von Willebrand factor (fW), antithrombin III (AT III) and plasminogen. Results and discussion. During the year of follow-up, patients with AF who underwent and had a high mortality rate. During the whole period 38 (14.6%) patients died, 15 (23.0%) - in the group with nAF, 6 (9.2%) - in the group with paroxysmal AF, 7 (10.8%) - in the group with persistent AF and 10 (15.4%) - in the group with permanent AF. After a year of follow-up, the level of fW in patients with nAF was higher than in patients of all groups, and statistically significant in patients with paroxysmal and persistent forms of AF. At III was important in the group of patients with nAF and with a constant form of AF, in the same groups there was no statistically significant increase in a year of follow-up. It was found that in survivors with nAF at III (73.54±8.67%) higher (p=0.002) compared with the dead (65.77±6.01%). In the group of patients with paroxysmal AF in survivors of III (77.75±10.15%) higher (p=0.031) compared with the dead (69.25±5.80%). In patients with persistent AF, the survivors of III (76.57±9.09%) were higher (p=0.002) compared to the dead (65.60±2.21%). Taking into account the results of the analysis of the dynamics of ed markers, it can be assumed that AT III is the most accurate prognostic marker for the studied cohort of patients. Conclusion. Detection and correction of ED in AF in patients within a year after stroke can optimize the tactics of management of patients and improve the prognosis of the diseas.
topic atrial fibrillation
cardioembolic stroke
endothelial dysfunction
mortality
divaza
url https://ter-arkhiv.ru/0040-3660/article/viewFile/32909/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT iazolotovskaya endothelialdysfunctionasignificantmarkerofadverseclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithatrialfibrillationaftercardioembolicstroke
AT ildavydkin endothelialdysfunctionasignificantmarkerofadverseclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithatrialfibrillationaftercardioembolicstroke
_version_ 1724607967392694272