Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Survival of junior scientists in academic biomedical research is difficult in today's highly competitive funding climate. National Institute of Health (NIH) data on first-time R01 grantees indicate the rate at which early investigators drop out from a NIH-supported research career is most rapid...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6135352?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-7986267f48a54e8fa970691cead9ff73 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7986267f48a54e8fa970691cead9ff732020-11-25T01:56:06ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01139e019964810.1371/journal.pone.0199648Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.Patricia A HaggertyMatthew J FentonSurvival of junior scientists in academic biomedical research is difficult in today's highly competitive funding climate. National Institute of Health (NIH) data on first-time R01 grantees indicate the rate at which early investigators drop out from a NIH-supported research career is most rapid 4 to 5 years from the first R01 award. The factors associated with a high risk of dropping out, and whether these factors impact all junior investigators equally, are unclear. We identified a cohort of 1,496 investigators who received their first R01-equivalent (R01-e) awards from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases between 2003 and 2010, and studied all their subsequent NIH grant applications through 2016. Ultimately, 57% of the cohort were successful in obtaining new R01-e funding, despite highly competitive conditions. Among those investigators who failed to compete successfully for new funding (43%), the average time to dropping out was 5 years. Investigators who successfully obtained new grants showed remarkable within-person consistency across multiple grant submission behaviors, including submitting more applications per year, more renewal applications, and more applications to multiple NIH Institutes. Funded investigators appeared to have two advantages over their unfunded peers at the outset: they had better scores on their first R01-e grants and they demonstrated an early ability to write applications that would be scored, not triaged. The cohort rapidly segregated into two very different groups on the basis of PI consistency in the quality and frequency of applications submitted after their first R01-e award. Lastly, we identified a number of specific demographic factors, intitutional characteristics, and grant submission behaviors that were associated with successful outcomes, and assessed their predictive value and relative importance for the likelihood of obtaining additional NIH funding.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6135352?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Patricia A Haggerty Matthew J Fenton |
spellingShingle |
Patricia A Haggerty Matthew J Fenton Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Patricia A Haggerty Matthew J Fenton |
author_sort |
Patricia A Haggerty |
title |
Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. |
title_short |
Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. |
title_full |
Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. |
title_fullStr |
Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. |
title_sort |
outcomes of early nih-funded investigators: experience of the national institute of allergy and infectious diseases. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Survival of junior scientists in academic biomedical research is difficult in today's highly competitive funding climate. National Institute of Health (NIH) data on first-time R01 grantees indicate the rate at which early investigators drop out from a NIH-supported research career is most rapid 4 to 5 years from the first R01 award. The factors associated with a high risk of dropping out, and whether these factors impact all junior investigators equally, are unclear. We identified a cohort of 1,496 investigators who received their first R01-equivalent (R01-e) awards from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases between 2003 and 2010, and studied all their subsequent NIH grant applications through 2016. Ultimately, 57% of the cohort were successful in obtaining new R01-e funding, despite highly competitive conditions. Among those investigators who failed to compete successfully for new funding (43%), the average time to dropping out was 5 years. Investigators who successfully obtained new grants showed remarkable within-person consistency across multiple grant submission behaviors, including submitting more applications per year, more renewal applications, and more applications to multiple NIH Institutes. Funded investigators appeared to have two advantages over their unfunded peers at the outset: they had better scores on their first R01-e grants and they demonstrated an early ability to write applications that would be scored, not triaged. The cohort rapidly segregated into two very different groups on the basis of PI consistency in the quality and frequency of applications submitted after their first R01-e award. Lastly, we identified a number of specific demographic factors, intitutional characteristics, and grant submission behaviors that were associated with successful outcomes, and assessed their predictive value and relative importance for the likelihood of obtaining additional NIH funding. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6135352?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT patriciaahaggerty outcomesofearlynihfundedinvestigatorsexperienceofthenationalinstituteofallergyandinfectiousdiseases AT matthewjfenton outcomesofearlynihfundedinvestigatorsexperienceofthenationalinstituteofallergyandinfectiousdiseases |
_version_ |
1724981600279592960 |