Value of conventional ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis based on the logistic regression model

ObjectiveTo investigate the value of conventional ultrasonography (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the differential diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by establishing a logistic regression model with the variables of US featu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: YE Xianjun
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2019-11-01
Series:Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
Online Access:http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=10322
id doaj-798490ee071e4f6291212c3e38569be7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-798490ee071e4f6291212c3e38569be72020-11-25T01:56:46ZzhoEditorial Department of Journal of Clinical HepatologyLinchuang Gandanbing Zazhi1001-52561001-52562019-11-01351125022507Value of conventional ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis based on the logistic regression modelYE Xianjun0Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China & Anhui Provincial HospitalObjectiveTo investigate the value of conventional ultrasonography (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the differential diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by establishing a logistic regression model with the variables of US features and CEUS enhancement pattern (circumferential ring enhancement). MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed for the US and CEUS features of 55 ICC patients and 42 HCC patients, and the results of surgical pathology or biopsy were used as the golden standard for diagnosis. A logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the value of four US features, lesion echo, blood supply type, bile duct dilatation, and circumferential ring enhancement of CEUS, in the differential diagnosis of ICC and HCC. The t-test was used for comparison of continuous data between groups, and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed for the factors with statistical significance in univariate analysis. Likelihood ratio was used to evaluate the fitting of the whole model, and the feature with the highest likelihood ratio in the qualitative diagnosis of ICC was screened out. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted for the logistic regression model in the qualitative diagnosis of ICC, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated. ResultsThere were significant differences between the two groups in lesion echo (χ2=4.813, P<0.05), blood supply type (χ2=10.222, P<0.01), bile duct dilatation (χ2=40.669, P<001), and circumferential ring enhancement of CEUS (χ2=8.180, P<0.01), and these four features had a sensitivity of 58.15%, 7273%, 67.27%, and 6909%, respectively, and a specificity of 64.29%, 59.52%, 66.4%, and 95.24%, respectively, all P<005, in the differential diagnosis of ICC and HCC. Type of lesion echo, blood supply, circumferential ring enhancement of CEUS, and presence or absence of bile duct dilatation had an odds ratio of 3.556, 4.107, 4.223, and 5.776, respectively. The binary logistic regression equation was Logistic (P)=-2.761+1.272X1+1.430X2+1.538X3+1.743X4. The likelihood-ratio test of this model showed a significant difference in this regression equation (χ2=94.691, P<0.001). In the qualitative diagnosis of ICC, this regression equation had a sensitivity of 743%, a specificity of 822%, and an AUC of 0.856. There was a significant difference in time to peak between the two groups (t=8497, P<001). ConclusionThe logistic regression model and CEUS qualitative analysis can improve the qualitative diagnosis of ICC.http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=10322
collection DOAJ
language zho
format Article
sources DOAJ
author YE Xianjun
spellingShingle YE Xianjun
Value of conventional ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis based on the logistic regression model
Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
author_facet YE Xianjun
author_sort YE Xianjun
title Value of conventional ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis based on the logistic regression model
title_short Value of conventional ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis based on the logistic regression model
title_full Value of conventional ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis based on the logistic regression model
title_fullStr Value of conventional ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis based on the logistic regression model
title_full_unstemmed Value of conventional ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis based on the logistic regression model
title_sort value of conventional ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: an analysis based on the logistic regression model
publisher Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Hepatology
series Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
issn 1001-5256
1001-5256
publishDate 2019-11-01
description ObjectiveTo investigate the value of conventional ultrasonography (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the differential diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by establishing a logistic regression model with the variables of US features and CEUS enhancement pattern (circumferential ring enhancement). MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed for the US and CEUS features of 55 ICC patients and 42 HCC patients, and the results of surgical pathology or biopsy were used as the golden standard for diagnosis. A logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the value of four US features, lesion echo, blood supply type, bile duct dilatation, and circumferential ring enhancement of CEUS, in the differential diagnosis of ICC and HCC. The t-test was used for comparison of continuous data between groups, and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed for the factors with statistical significance in univariate analysis. Likelihood ratio was used to evaluate the fitting of the whole model, and the feature with the highest likelihood ratio in the qualitative diagnosis of ICC was screened out. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted for the logistic regression model in the qualitative diagnosis of ICC, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated. ResultsThere were significant differences between the two groups in lesion echo (χ2=4.813, P<0.05), blood supply type (χ2=10.222, P<0.01), bile duct dilatation (χ2=40.669, P<001), and circumferential ring enhancement of CEUS (χ2=8.180, P<0.01), and these four features had a sensitivity of 58.15%, 7273%, 67.27%, and 6909%, respectively, and a specificity of 64.29%, 59.52%, 66.4%, and 95.24%, respectively, all P<005, in the differential diagnosis of ICC and HCC. Type of lesion echo, blood supply, circumferential ring enhancement of CEUS, and presence or absence of bile duct dilatation had an odds ratio of 3.556, 4.107, 4.223, and 5.776, respectively. The binary logistic regression equation was Logistic (P)=-2.761+1.272X1+1.430X2+1.538X3+1.743X4. The likelihood-ratio test of this model showed a significant difference in this regression equation (χ2=94.691, P<0.001). In the qualitative diagnosis of ICC, this regression equation had a sensitivity of 743%, a specificity of 822%, and an AUC of 0.856. There was a significant difference in time to peak between the two groups (t=8497, P<001). ConclusionThe logistic regression model and CEUS qualitative analysis can improve the qualitative diagnosis of ICC.
url http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=10322
work_keys_str_mv AT yexianjun valueofconventionalultrasonographyandcontrastenhancedultrasoundinthedifferentialdiagnosisofintrahepaticcholangiocellularcarcinomaandhepatocellularcarcinomaananalysisbasedonthelogisticregressionmodel
_version_ 1724977921161953280